Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Professional Cloud Architect (PR000213) Exam - Topic 3 Question 109 Discussion

Posted by Kristeen on Jul 10, 2025 at 01:52 PM

For this question, refer to the TerramEarth case study. You are asked to design a new architecture for the

ingestion of the data of the 200,000 vehicles that are connected to a cellular network. You want to follow

Google-recommended practices.

Considering the technical requirements, which components should you use for the ingestion of the data?

Get Premium Professional Cloud Architect (PR000213) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
KI
Kimbery 10 months ago
Totally agree, Cloud IoT Core is the best choice here!
TI
Tijuana 10 months ago
Wait, are we really considering Compute Engine for this? Seems outdated.
FR
Frederick 10 months ago
Definitely going with Cloud IoT Core for secure data ingestion.
RO
Rosenda 11 months ago
I think GKE is overkill for this.
CA
Carmen 11 months ago
Not sure if public/private keys are the way to go. What about scalability?
AR
Aretha 11 months ago
I keep getting confused between the options, but I think Cloud IoT Core aligns best with Google’s best practices for IoT data.
ME
Merlyn 11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think Compute Engine options might not be the best fit for this scenario since they seem more manual.
FR
Frederica 11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like Google Kubernetes Engine could also work for handling large-scale data ingestion.
SH
Sheridan 12 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of secure data ingestion, so I think Cloud IoT Core with public/private key pairs might be the right choice.
LI
Lillian 12 months ago
The SSL Ingress in option A sounds like a good security feature, but I'm not sure if that's the most appropriate solution for this specific use case.
AS
Ashley 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the Kubernetes and Compute Engine options. I'll need to review those in more detail to make a confident choice.
GW
Gwen 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option B, Cloud IoT Core with public/private key pairs, as that seems to align best with the requirements and Google's recommendations.
LA
Layla 1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The key is to focus on the Google-recommended practices for ingesting data from a large number of connected vehicles.
EL
Elvis 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before answering.
MA
Matilda 1 year ago
Personally, I think B) Cloud IoT Core with public/private key pairs is the way to go. It's like putting your data in a vault with a secret handshake. Genius!
IL
Iluminada 1 year ago
↳ replying to Matilda
I agree, B) Cloud IoT Core with public/private key pairs provides an extra layer of security.
CE
Cecil 1 year ago
I don't know, you guys. I'm kind of leaning towards C) Compute Engine with project-wide SSH keys. Seems like the easiest option, and hey, what could go wrong?
MI
Michal 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Compute Engine with specific SSH keys for better security.
CR
Craig 1 year ago
D) Compute Engine with specific SSH keys sounds like a good choice. I mean, who doesn't love a little extra security?
JO
Josphine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Craig
User 2: B) Cloud IoT Core with public/private key pairs seems like a more secure option.
JO
Johnson 1 year ago
↳ replying to Craig
User 1: I think A) Google Kubernetes Engine with an SSL Ingress is the way to go.
FA
Fatima 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I'd probably go with A) Google Kubernetes Engine with an SSL Ingress. Seems like the most Google-y option, if you ask me.
CA
Casey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Fatima
Yeah, it seems like the most Google-y option for ingesting data from 200,000 vehicles.
TH
Theron 1 year ago
↳ replying to Fatima
I agree, it follows Google-recommended practices.
BE
Bea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Fatima
I think A) Google Kubernetes Engine with an SSL Ingress is a good choice.
AL
Alva 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe Cloud IoT Core with public/private key pairs would be a better choice.
LA
Lavonda 1 year ago
I think we should use Google Kubernetes Engine with an SSL Ingress.
TH
Thurman 1 year ago
I think B) Cloud IoT Core with public/private key pairs is the way to go. Gotta keep that data secure, you know?
KA
Kallie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Thurman
Using public/private key pairs is a smart choice to ensure data protection.
LO
Lorean 1 year ago
↳ replying to Thurman
I agree, security is definitely a top priority when dealing with sensitive data.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel