Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Professional Cloud Architect (PR000213) Exam - Topic 2 Question 86 Discussion

For this question, refer to the EHR Healthcare case study. You need to define the technical architecture for hybrid connectivity between EHR's on-premises systems and Google Cloud. You want to follow Google's recommended practices for production-level applications. Considering the EHR Healthcare business and technical requirements, what should you do?
A) Configure two Partner Interconnect connections in one metro (City), and make sure the Interconnect connections are placed in different metro zones.
B) Configure two VPN connections from on-premises to Google Cloud, and make sure the VPN devices on-premises are in separate racks.
C) Configure Direct Peering between EHR Healthcare and Google Cloud, and make sure you are peering at least two Google locations.
D) Configure two Dedicated Interconnect connections in one metro (City) and two connections in another metro, and make sure the Interconnect connections are placed in different metro zones.

Google Professional Cloud Architect (PR000213) Exam - Topic 2 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Architect (PR000213) exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 2
[All Professional Cloud Architect (PR000213) Questions]

For this question, refer to the EHR Healthcare case study. You need to define the technical architecture for hybrid connectivity between EHR's on-premises systems and Google Cloud. You want to follow Google's recommended practices for production-level applications. Considering the EHR Healthcare business and technical requirements, what should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When an application becomes slow, the first step you should take is to gather information about the underlying cause of the problem. One way to do this is by inspecting the logs and metrics from the instances where the application is deployed. Google Cloud Platform (GCP) provides tools such as Cloud Logging and Cloud Monitoring that can help you to collect and analyze this information. By reviewing the logs and metrics from the instances, you may be able to identify issues such as resource shortages (e.g. CPU, memory, or disk), network problems, or application errors that are causing the performance issues. Once you have identified the underlying cause of the problem, you can take steps to resolve it.


by Jacki at Jun 29, 2024, 10:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud Architect (PR000213) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tiffiny
9 months ago
Not sure about C, peering at two locations sounds complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
9 months ago
Definitely going with A for the metro zone strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
10 months ago
Wait, are we really considering Direct Peering? Seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
10 months ago
I think B is a safer bet with the separate racks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
10 months ago
Option D seems solid for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
10 months ago
I vaguely recall something about Direct Peering, but I'm not confident if option C is the right approach for hybrid connectivity. It seems less common.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
11 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question about interconnects, and I think having connections in different metro zones is crucial. That makes me lean towards option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think VPN connections could be less reliable for production-level applications. Maybe option B isn't the best?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of redundancy in connectivity, so option D sounds like it might be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
11 months ago
I agree with Janine's strategy. Configuring multiple Dedicated Interconnect connections in different metros and zones is the way to go to ensure high availability and reliability for this production-level application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
11 months ago
Based on the options, I think the best approach is to configure two Dedicated Interconnect connections in one metro and two more in another metro, making sure they are in different zones. This provides redundancy and follows Google's recommended practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
11 months ago
Okay, let's break this down. We need to define the technical architecture for hybrid connectivity between EHR's on-premises systems and Google Cloud, following Google's recommended practices. The key is to ensure high availability and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I was thinking maybe Tactical plans, since those deal with more short-term objectives and implementation. But Operational plans could also make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
11 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think I know the answer, but I'll double-check the material just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
11 months ago
Hmm, I'd check the environment selection carefully. Sometimes the wrong host group can mess up reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
1 year ago
Wait, was that a trick question? I feel like I'm missing something obvious here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
1 year ago
Option B seems a bit outdated, but I could be wrong. Time to brush up on my Google Cloud knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
Whitney
1 year ago
Let's make sure to consider the EHR Healthcare business and technical requirements when making our decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
1 year ago
I agree, having two Partner Interconnect connections in different metro zones provides redundancy and high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice. It follows Google's recommended practices for production-level applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nell
1 year ago
Haha, these options are like a maze! I'll have to channel my inner network architect to figure this one out.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
1 year ago
Yeah, these options definitely require some technical expertise to navigate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
1 year ago
I think Option D might be overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
1 year ago
Option A sounds like a solid plan for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyce
1 year ago
Option C seems the most straightforward, but I'm not sure if it meets the business requirements. Guess I'll have to dig deeper into the case study.
upvoted 0 times
Lindy
1 year ago
I think option D might be a better fit for the business requirements. It provides redundancy across different metros.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
1 year ago
C) Configure Direct Peering between EHR Healthcare and Google Cloud, and make sure you are peering at least two Google locations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
1 year ago
B) Configure two VPN connections from on-premises to Google Cloud, and make sure the VPN devices on-premises are in separate racks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
1 year ago
A) Configure two Partner Interconnect connections in one metro (City), and make sure the Interconnect connections are placed in different metro zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terry
1 year ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more cost-effective and meets Google's recommended practices for production-level applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better as it offers even more redundancy with four Dedicated Interconnect connections in different metro zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice because it provides redundancy with two Partner Interconnect connections in different metro zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
1 year ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more cost-effective and meets the requirements of the case study.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the better choice as it provides even more redundancy with four Dedicated Interconnect connections in different metro zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
1 year ago
Hmm, this one looks tricky. I'm leaning towards Option D, but I'll have to double-check the Google recommendations to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
Craig
1 year ago
You're right, let's double-check to ensure we're on the right track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
1 year ago
But what about the Google recommendations? We should make sure we're following their best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
1 year ago
I agree, having multiple Dedicated Interconnect connections in different metros seems like a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 year ago
I think Option D sounds like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusa
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice because it provides redundancy by having two Partner Interconnect connections in different metro zones.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel