Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Associate Cloud Engineer Exam - Topic 8 Question 60 Discussion

Your company has developed a new application that consists of multiple microservices. You want to deploy the application to Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), and you want to ensure that the cluster can scale as more applications are deployed in the future. You want to avoid manual intervention when each new application is deployed. What should you do?
C) Create a GKE cluster with autoscaling enabled on the node pool. Set a minimum and maximum for the size of the node pool.
A) Deploy the application on GKE, and add a HorizontalPodAutoscaler to the deployment.
B) Deploy the application on GKE, and add a VerticalPodAutoscaler to the deployment.
D) Create a separate node pool for each application, and deploy each application to its dedicated node pool.

Google Associate Cloud Engineer Exam - Topic 8 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Associate Cloud Engineer exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 8
[All Associate Cloud Engineer Questions]

Your company has developed a new application that consists of multiple microservices. You want to deploy the application to Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), and you want to ensure that the cluster can scale as more applications are deployed in the future. You want to avoid manual intervention when each new application is deployed. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/cluster-autoscaler#adding_a_node_pool_with_autoscaling


by Maurine at Nov 17, 2022, 05:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Associate Cloud Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Noemi
7 months ago
VerticalPodAutoscaler? Isn't that just for adjusting resource requests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
7 months ago
I agree with C, but isn't there a risk of over-provisioning?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
7 months ago
Wait, why would you create separate node pools? Seems inefficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
8 months ago
I think A is better for scaling pods specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
8 months ago
Definitely go with option C for autoscaling the node pool!
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
8 months ago
I recall that having separate node pools for each application could complicate things, but it might help with resource allocation. Not entirely sure though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like VerticalPodAutoscaler is more about adjusting pod resources rather than scaling the cluster itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
8 months ago
I think creating a GKE cluster with autoscaling enabled on the node pool sounds familiar. It might help manage resources better as we deploy more apps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
8 months ago
I remember studying about HorizontalPodAutoscaler, but I'm not sure if that's the best choice for scaling the entire cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused here. If the error is material but not pervasive, wouldn't a qualified opinion be more appropriate? I'll have to review the differences between the modified opinions to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the second step is estimating the normalized level of earnings. That's a key part of the capitalized excess earnings method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
8 months ago
I remember a practice question where we created an xconnect, and it used encapsulation mpls too. That feels right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
8 months ago
I think the key here is to consider the potential impact on existing configurations and workflows. Changing the issue type name could break things, so we need to be careful.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel