Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Associate Cloud Engineer Exam - Topic 6 Question 1 Discussion

You need a dynamic way of provisioning VMs on Compute Engine. The exact specifications will be in a dedicated configuration file. You want to follow Google's recommended practices. Which method should you use?
C) Managed Instance Group
A) Deployment Manager
B) Cloud Composer
D) Unmanaged Instance Group

Google Associate Cloud Engineer Exam - Topic 6 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Associate Cloud Engineer exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 6
[All Associate Cloud Engineer Questions]

You need a dynamic way of provisioning VMs on Compute Engine. The exact specifications will be in a dedicated configuration file. You want to follow Google's recommended practices. Which method should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Nan
7 months ago
Surprised that D, Unmanaged Instance Group, is even an option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
7 months ago
A is the best choice, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
8 months ago
Wait, isn't B, Cloud Composer, more for workflows?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
8 months ago
I think C, Managed Instance Group, could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
8 months ago
Definitely A, Deployment Manager is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
8 months ago
I feel like Cloud Composer is more about workflow orchestration, so it probably isn't the answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
8 months ago
I remember practicing with Managed Instance Groups for scaling, but I'm not sure if that's what they mean by provisioning VMs dynamically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
8 months ago
I think Deployment Manager might be the right choice since it uses configuration files to manage resources, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
8 months ago
Unmanaged Instance Groups seem too basic for what they're asking; I think it's definitely between Deployment Manager and Managed Instance Groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
8 months ago
Process flow charts could work, but I don't think they're the best fit for this scenario. Ishikawa diagrams are designed specifically for analyzing the root causes of issues, so that seems like the most appropriate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the VMware and NetApp features carefully to identify the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
8 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the best way to balance security and access for our external partners.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel