Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Associate Cloud Engineer Exam - Topic 4 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Associate Cloud Engineer exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 4
[All Associate Cloud Engineer Questions]

You want to set up a Google Kubernetes Engine cluster Verifiable node identity and integrity are required for the cluster, and nodes cannot be accessed from the internet. You want to reduce the operational cost of managing your cluster, and you want to follow Google-recommended practices. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Rolland at Jul 05, 2025, 03:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Associate Cloud Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ronald
5 months ago
Wait, why would anyone choose a public cluster?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
5 months ago
I think D is better for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
5 months ago
A is the way to go for cost efficiency!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
6 months ago
Surprised that A is even an option here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
6 months ago
Totally agree with D, shielded nodes are a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D as well, but I’m a bit confused about the differences between standard and autopilot clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like deploying a public cluster would go against the requirement of not having internet access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about shielded nodes providing extra security. Maybe option D is worth considering?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
7 months ago
I think the private autopilot cluster might be the best option since it aligns with the requirement for nodes not being accessible from the internet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
7 months ago
I think option A is the way to go here. A private autopilot cluster gives you the security and identity verification you need, while also automating a lot of the management tasks to keep costs down. Seems like the perfect solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
7 months ago
I'm a little confused by the differences between the cluster types. Can someone help me understand the pros and cons of each option? I want to make sure I pick the right one that fully addresses all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
7 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking for a solution that meets the security requirements and minimizes operational overhead. A private autopilot cluster (option A) seems like the best fit - it provides the node identity and isolation needed, while also automating a lot of the management tasks to reduce costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The requirements around node identity and internet access are clear, but I'm not sure how the different cluster types compare in terms of operational cost. I'll need to review the details of each option more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brunilda
8 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the requirements of verifiable node identity, no internet access, and reducing operational cost. Based on that, I'd go with option A - a private autopilot cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
10 months ago
That's true, but option D also meets those requirements while keeping the nodes private.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
10 months ago
But option C provides the required verifiable node identity and integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A, it seems like the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
10 months ago
If I'm being honest, this question is about as clear as mud. But hey, at least they're not asking us to solve world peace, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
10 months ago
Hmm, B) a public autopilot cluster? Nah, not with those requirements. Might as well put a giant 'Hack Me' sign on the front door.
upvoted 0 times
Sharen
9 months ago
A) Deploy a private autopilot cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
10 months ago
D) Deploy a standard private cluster and enable shielded nodes. Gotta keep those nodes safe and sound, you know? Google-recommended practices, ftw!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
10 months ago
A private autopilot cluster seems like the way to go here. Verifiable node identity and no internet access? Autopilot's got your back!
upvoted 0 times
Lyla
10 months ago
C) Deploy a standard public cluster and enable shielded nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
10 months ago
A) Deploy a private autopilot cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
10 months ago
C) Deploy a standard public cluster and enable shielded nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
10 months ago
A) Deploy a private autopilot cluster
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearlie
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
10 months ago
I think we should go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel