New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Associate Cloud Engineer Exam - Topic 3 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Associate Cloud Engineer exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 3
[All Associate Cloud Engineer Questions]

You need to deploy a single stateless web application with a web interface and multiple endpoints. For security reasons, the web application must be reachable from an internal IP address from your company's private VPC and on-premises network. You also need to update the web application multiple times per day with minimal effort and want to manage a minimal amount of cloud infrastructure. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Stephanie at Feb 08, 2025, 09:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Associate Cloud Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rosio
3 months ago
Surprised that people are considering GKE at all for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
3 months ago
B has the right balance of simplicity and security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
3 months ago
Wait, isn't GKE more complex to manage than Cloud Run?
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
4 months ago
I disagree, C seems more robust for scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
4 months ago
I think option B is the best choice for minimal management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between the options, especially between Cloud Run and GKE. I need to review that again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to secure access, and I think deploying with Private Service Connect could be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
I think GKE Autopilot could work too, but I feel like it might involve more management than I want.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
5 months ago
I remember we discussed using Cloud Run for stateless applications, but I'm not sure about the Private Google Access part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option B, Cloud Run with Private Google Access, is the way to go here. It meets all the requirements, and the managed serverless platform should make it easy to update the app frequently with minimal effort on my part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The key requirements are internal network access, minimal cloud infrastructure, and easy updates. I'm leaning towards option C - GKE Autopilot with Private Google Access. That way, I can take advantage of the managed Kubernetes service and still have the private network access I need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions wanting to update the web app multiple times a day, so I'm wondering if Cloud Run is the best option since it might require more manual effort to deploy new versions. Maybe GKE Autopilot with Private Google Access would be a better choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think I'll go with option B - Deploy the web application on Cloud Run with Private Google Access configured. That seems like the easiest way to meet the requirements of being reachable from the internal network and minimizing cloud infrastructure management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
11 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam designers are trying to trick us with all these similar-sounding options. But I think Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. GKE Autopilot with Private Google Access seems like a good balance between control and ease of management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
11 months ago
I don't know, the Kubernetes management in Option A might be overkill for a simple web app. Cloud Run with Private Service Connect in Option D could be a good compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
11 months ago
Option B seems like the easiest way to go. Cloud Run with Private Google Access sounds like the perfect fit for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Olive
11 months ago
I think it's a good choice for managing minimal cloud infrastructure while meeting security requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
11 months ago
It definitely simplifies the deployment process and ensures security for internal access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
11 months ago
Definitely, it's important to ensure the web application is secure and easily updatable with minimal effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
11 months ago
I agree, Cloud Run with Private Google Access seems like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
11 months ago
I agree, Cloud Run with Private Google Access would provide the security and ease of management needed for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
11 months ago
B) Deploy the web application on Cloud Run with Private Google Access configured
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
11 months ago
Option B seems like the easiest way to go. Cloud Run with Private Google Access sounds like the perfect fit for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Buck
1 year ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more suitable for our needs of updating the web application multiple times per day with minimal effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better as it allows us to deploy the web application on Cloud Run with Private Google Access configured for better security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows us to deploy the web application on Google Kubernetes Engine with an internal ingress.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel