Google Associate Cloud Engineer Exam - Topic 2 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Associate Cloud Engineer exam

Question #: 43
Topic #: 2

[All Associate Cloud Engineer Questions]

Your managed instance group raised an alert stating that new instance creation has failed to create new instances. You need to maintain the number of running instances specified by the template to be able to process expected application traffic. What should you do?

ACreate an instance template that contains valid syntax which will be used by the instance group. Delete any persistent disks with the same name as instance names.

BCreate an instance template that contains valid syntax that will be used by the instance group. Verify that the instance name and persistent disk name values are not the same in the template.

CVerify that the instance template being used by the instance group contains valid syntax. Delete any persistent disks with the same name as instance names. Set the disks.autoDelete property to true in the instance template.

DDelete the current instance template and replace it with a new instance template. Verify that the instance name and persistent disk name values are not the same in the template. Set the disks.autoDelete property to true in the instance template.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/instance-groups/creating-groups-of-managed-instances

by Iluminada at May 03, 2022, 06:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Associate Cloud Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Merri

5 months ago

Is it really necessary to delete disks? Sounds like a hassle.

upvoted 0 times

...

Juliann

5 months ago

Definitely not A, that won't solve the naming issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

5 months ago

Wait, why would we delete persistent disks? That sounds risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

5 months ago

I think C is the way to go, autoDelete is key!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elouise

5 months ago

Option B seems solid, just need to check those names.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chara

5 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we had to check for naming conflicts. I think option C might be the right choice since it also mentions setting the disks.autoDelete property.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shayne

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option B makes sense since it mentions verifying the instance and disk names. That could prevent conflicts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merissa

5 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of having valid syntax in the instance template. I think that might be crucial here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

5 months ago

I recall that deleting persistent disks with the same name could help, but I'm not confident if that's the only step needed. Maybe option D covers more bases?

upvoted 0 times

...

Noelia

6 months ago

This is a good question to test our understanding of conflict of interest detection. I'll carefully consider each option and try to identify the one that doesn't fit with the others.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the size limit for cookies. I think it's 4KB, not 5MB, but I'll double-check that. The other options seem pretty straightforward though, so I'll try to answer those.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marva

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different Azure subscriptions and regions mentioned. I'll need to review the details closely and think through the connectivity requirements to come up with the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

6 months ago

Ah, I remember learning that vi was inspired by the pico editor. I'll select option C.

upvoted 0 times

...