Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM ISO-31000-CLA Exam - Topic 7 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's ISO-31000-CLA exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 7
[All ISO-31000-CLA Questions]

A train has crashed and is badly damaged. There have been numerous claims from injured passengers as well as a loss of revenue for the train operator. This is an example of

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A train crash and its consequences is an example of risk aggregation, which is the combined effect of multiple risks on an organisation's objectives3. Risk aggregation can result in losses that are greater than the sum of individual losses.


by Asuncion at Nov 22, 2025, 08:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-31000-CLA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Otis
6 days ago
Risk severity is definitely the main issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
11 days ago
I feel risk probability is less relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
17 days ago
But isn't it about categorizing the types of risks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
22 days ago
Risk aggregation could fit too. Many claims together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
27 days ago
I agree, risk severity makes sense. Many injured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
2 months ago
I think it's risk severity. The damage is huge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
2 months ago
It's all about how bad the situation is, so risk severity makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
2 months ago
Seems like a stretch to call it risk probability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
2 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not risk aggregation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
2 months ago
Totally agree, the damage is severe!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
2 months ago
Haha, this question is a train wreck! But seriously, I'd say D) risk severity is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
3 months ago
This is definitely an example of risk severity. The train crash has caused significant damage and losses, which is the essence of risk severity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is D) risk severity. The train crash has resulted in severe consequences, such as injured passengers and financial losses for the operator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards risk probability, but I’m not confident. It seems like it could also be about the impact of the crash.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
3 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we discussed risk categorisation in relation to different types of incidents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about risk aggregation being about combining multiple risks. Could that apply here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
3 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy for this. The scenario describes a specific event - a train crash - so I'm thinking the answer has to do with how that event is classified in terms of risk. Probability, severity, and categorization seem like the most relevant concepts here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
4 months ago
This is definitely about risk severity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
4 months ago
I think this might relate to risk severity since there are multiple claims and significant damage involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
4 months ago
This one's tricky. I'm trying to remember the definitions of those risk terms. I know risk severity has to do with the potential impact, but I'm not sure how that applies here. Guess I'll have to make an educated guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
4 months ago
B) risk categorisation seems like the best answer to me. The train crash can be categorised as a transportation-related risk that the operator should have accounted for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
4 months ago
I'm going with C) risk probability. The train crash, while a severe event, is still a relatively rare occurrence, so the probability of such an event happening is the key factor here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the type of risk, so I need to consider the different risk concepts like probability, severity, categorization, etc. I'm a bit unsure, but I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a question about risk management. I think the key is to identify the type of risk involved in the train crash scenario. Let me think this through...
upvoted 0 times
Phuong
1 day ago
This is definitely about risk severity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel