New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM ISO-31000-CLA Exam - Topic 7 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's ISO-31000-CLA exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 7
[All ISO-31000-CLA Questions]

A train has crashed and is badly damaged. There have been numerous claims from injured passengers as well as a loss of revenue for the train operator. This is an example of

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Annamaria
10 hours ago
I think it's risk severity. The damage is huge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
6 days ago
It's all about how bad the situation is, so risk severity makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
11 days ago
Seems like a stretch to call it risk probability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
16 days ago
Wait, are we sure it's not risk aggregation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
21 days ago
Totally agree, the damage is severe!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
26 days ago
Haha, this question is a train wreck! But seriously, I'd say D) risk severity is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
1 month ago
This is definitely an example of risk severity. The train crash has caused significant damage and losses, which is the essence of risk severity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
1 month ago
I think the correct answer is D) risk severity. The train crash has resulted in severe consequences, such as injured passengers and financial losses for the operator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 month ago
I’m leaning towards risk probability, but I’m not confident. It seems like it could also be about the impact of the crash.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
2 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we discussed risk categorisation in relation to different types of incidents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about risk aggregation being about combining multiple risks. Could that apply here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
2 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy for this. The scenario describes a specific event - a train crash - so I'm thinking the answer has to do with how that event is classified in terms of risk. Probability, severity, and categorization seem like the most relevant concepts here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
2 months ago
This is definitely about risk severity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
2 months ago
I think this might relate to risk severity since there are multiple claims and significant damage involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
2 months ago
This one's tricky. I'm trying to remember the definitions of those risk terms. I know risk severity has to do with the potential impact, but I'm not sure how that applies here. Guess I'll have to make an educated guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
3 months ago
B) risk categorisation seems like the best answer to me. The train crash can be categorised as a transportation-related risk that the operator should have accounted for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
3 months ago
I'm going with C) risk probability. The train crash, while a severe event, is still a relatively rare occurrence, so the probability of such an event happening is the key factor here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
3 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the type of risk, so I need to consider the different risk concepts like probability, severity, categorization, etc. I'm a bit unsure, but I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
3 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a question about risk management. I think the key is to identify the type of risk involved in the train crash scenario. Let me think this through...
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel