MENU
It's come to your attention that some team members feel that Carlos is a negative influence on the team. You can certainly understand why --- he believes that everything is doomed. What should you do?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CSM-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
41 comments · newest first
CO
Cory
11 months ago
Ignoring it won't help, we need to address it somehow.
NI
Nidia
11 months ago
Totally agree, using him for risk identification makes sense!
EL
Elise
11 months ago
Really? Is he actually that bad? Sounds exaggerated.
KR
Kris
12 months ago
I think we should keep him! Negativity can lead to better planning.
WI
Willard
12 months ago
Carlos always points out risks, but it can be helpful.
CH
Cherilyn
12 months ago
Escalating to higher authorities seems drastic. I wonder if there’s a middle ground where we can address the concerns without making it a big deal.
TR
Tresa
1 year ago
I think ignoring the issue could backfire. We talked about how unresolved conflicts can lead to bigger problems later on.
MA
Marylyn
1 year ago
I'm not sure if removing him is the best option. It feels like that might just create more tension in the team.
AY
Ayesha
1 year ago
I remember discussing how negativity can sometimes be useful for identifying risks, so maybe using Carlos as an asset could be a good approach.
CO
Colby
1 year ago
I think the key is to find a way to channel Carlos' negativity in a constructive way. If we can get him to focus on risk identification, that could really benefit the team.
GA
Gary
1 year ago
Escalating to higher authorities might be necessary if the team can't find a way to work with Carlos. But I'd want to try other options first.
TH
Theresia
1 year ago
I don't think ignoring the issue is a good idea. It's likely to just get worse if we don't address it.
CI
Ciara
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards using Carlos as an asset. His negative outlook could actually help us identify potential risks that we might have overlooked.
ST
Starr
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if removing Carlos is the best approach, but I can see why the team is frustrated with his negativity.
IS
Isaac
1 year ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. The wording of the question and answers is making me second-guess myself. Maybe I should quickly review my notes on performance measurement before selecting an answer.
AU
Audra
1 year ago
This seems straightforward. I think I'll go with option B and pass the entire Records array to the child FlexCard.
JU
Justa
1 year ago
I remember from our fraud examination class that reports need to be comprehensive and credible. Something that seems less central to reporting could be the 'not' function.
TR
Tracie
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure this is the PDCA cycle - Plan, Do, Check, and Act. I'll go with option A.
GL
Glendora
1 year ago
I feel uncertain about the options. The Internet is a potential answer too, but I'm leaning more towards mobile.
JE
Jesusita
2 years ago
Haha, I can just picture Carlos sitting in the corner muttering 'I told you so' while the rest of us are trying to get things done. Option B might be our best shot at keeping him on track.
SY
Sylvia
2 years ago
Option D all the way! Escalating this to the higher-ups is the responsible thing to do. We can't have one person undermining the whole team's morale.
BO
Bok
2 years ago
D) Escalate the issue with the higher authorities
NI
Nicolette
2 years ago
B) Use Carlos as an asset, particularly during risk identification
EL
Elizabeth
2 years ago
A) Remove Carlos from the team.
MA
Macy
2 years ago
D) Escalate the issue with the higher authorities
IL
Ilene
2 years ago
B) Use Carlos as an asset, particularly during risk identification
JE
Jesusa
2 years ago
A) Remove Carlos from the team.
AL
Alison
2 years ago
I think we should escalate the issue with higher authorities to address the negativity.
DO
Dorcas
2 years ago
I agree with Roslyn, Carlos might have a different perspective that could be valuable.
VI
Viola
2 years ago
Hmm, I don't know. Ignoring him and hoping it goes away? That sounds like the easy way out. We need to be proactive and address this head-on.
CE
Ceola
2 years ago
I agree, it's important to address the issue and not just ignore it.
AR
Arlette
2 years ago
We should use Carlos as an asset, particularly during risk identification.
RO
Roslyn
2 years ago
I disagree, we should use Carlos as an asset for risk identification.
FE
Fernanda
2 years ago
I'm not sure I agree with Jutta. Removing Carlos from the team might be the best solution if he's really that much of a negative influence. We don't want him dragging the whole team down.
IS
Isaiah
2 years ago
I agree, removing him from the team might be necessary if he's really that negative.
LE
Leota
2 years ago
I think we should use Carlos as an asset, especially during risk identification.
JE
Jean
2 years ago
I think we should remove Carlos from the team.
JU
Jutta
2 years ago
I think option B is the way to go. Carlos could actually be a valuable asset in identifying potential risks if we can get him to channel that negative energy in a productive way.
RO
Ronny
2 years ago
Removing Carlos might not be the best solution. Let's see if we can use his mindset to our advantage.
LI
Lindy
2 years ago
I agree, we shouldn't just ignore him. We should leverage his perspective to benefit the team.
CA
Carman
2 years ago
Let's try to turn Carlos' negativity into something positive. He might be able to help us identify risks we haven't considered.