GAQM CSM-001 Exam - Topic 5 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CSM-001 exam

Question #: 76
Topic #: 5

It's come to your attention that some team members feel that Carlos is a negative influence on the team. You can certainly understand why --- he believes that everything is doomed. What should you do?

ARemove Carlos from the team.

BUse Carlos as an asset, particularly during risk identification

CIgnore him and hope it goes away

DEscalate the issue with the higher authorities

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Mauricio at Jun 19, 2024, 02:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSM-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Cory

3 months ago

Ignoring it won't help, we need to address it somehow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nidia

3 months ago

Totally agree, using him for risk identification makes sense!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elise

3 months ago

Really? Is he actually that bad? Sounds exaggerated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

4 months ago

I think we should keep him! Negativity can lead to better planning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

4 months ago

Carlos always points out risks, but it can be helpful.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherilyn

4 months ago

Escalating to higher authorities seems drastic. I wonder if there’s a middle ground where we can address the concerns without making it a big deal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tresa

4 months ago

I think ignoring the issue could backfire. We talked about how unresolved conflicts can lead to bigger problems later on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylyn

4 months ago

I'm not sure if removing him is the best option. It feels like that might just create more tension in the team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ayesha

5 months ago

I remember discussing how negativity can sometimes be useful for identifying risks, so maybe using Carlos as an asset could be a good approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colby

5 months ago

I think the key is to find a way to channel Carlos' negativity in a constructive way. If we can get him to focus on risk identification, that could really benefit the team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gary

5 months ago

Escalating to higher authorities might be necessary if the team can't find a way to work with Carlos. But I'd want to try other options first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theresia

5 months ago

I don't think ignoring the issue is a good idea. It's likely to just get worse if we don't address it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm leaning towards using Carlos as an asset. His negative outlook could actually help us identify potential risks that we might have overlooked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Starr

5 months ago

This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if removing Carlos is the best approach, but I can see why the team is frustrated with his negativity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isaac

5 months ago

I'm a little unsure about this one. The wording of the question and answers is making me second-guess myself. Maybe I should quickly review my notes on performance measurement before selecting an answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audra

5 months ago

This seems straightforward. I think I'll go with option B and pass the entire Records array to the child FlexCard.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justa

5 months ago

I remember from our fraud examination class that reports need to be comprehensive and credible. Something that seems less central to reporting could be the 'not' function.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tracie

5 months ago

I'm pretty sure this is the PDCA cycle - Plan, Do, Check, and Act. I'll go with option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

5 months ago

I feel uncertain about the options. The Internet is a potential answer too, but I'm leaning more towards mobile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

2 years ago

Haha, I can just picture Carlos sitting in the corner muttering 'I told you so' while the rest of us are trying to get things done. Option B might be our best shot at keeping him on track.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvia

2 years ago

Option D all the way! Escalating this to the higher-ups is the responsible thing to do. We can't have one person undermining the whole team's morale.

upvoted 0 times

Bok

1 year ago

D) Escalate the issue with the higher authorities

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicolette

2 years ago

B) Use Carlos as an asset, particularly during risk identification

upvoted 0 times

...

Elizabeth

2 years ago

A) Remove Carlos from the team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Macy

2 years ago

D) Escalate the issue with the higher authorities

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilene

2 years ago

B) Use Carlos as an asset, particularly during risk identification

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusa

2 years ago

A) Remove Carlos from the team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alison

2 years ago

I think we should escalate the issue with higher authorities to address the negativity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorcas

2 years ago

I agree with Roslyn, Carlos might have a different perspective that could be valuable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

2 years ago

Hmm, I don't know. Ignoring him and hoping it goes away? That sounds like the easy way out. We need to be proactive and address this head-on.

upvoted 0 times

Ceola

2 years ago

I agree, it's important to address the issue and not just ignore it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

2 years ago

We should use Carlos as an asset, particularly during risk identification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roslyn

2 years ago

I disagree, we should use Carlos as an asset for risk identification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

2 years ago

I'm not sure I agree with Jutta. Removing Carlos from the team might be the best solution if he's really that much of a negative influence. We don't want him dragging the whole team down.

upvoted 0 times

Isaiah

2 years ago

I agree, removing him from the team might be necessary if he's really that negative.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

2 years ago

I think we should use Carlos as an asset, especially during risk identification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jean

2 years ago

I think we should remove Carlos from the team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jutta

2 years ago

I think option B is the way to go. Carlos could actually be a valuable asset in identifying potential risks if we can get him to channel that negative energy in a productive way.

upvoted 0 times

Ronny

2 years ago

Removing Carlos might not be the best solution. Let's see if we can use his mindset to our advantage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindy

2 years ago

I agree, we shouldn't just ignore him. We should leverage his perspective to benefit the team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carman

2 years ago

Let's try to turn Carlos' negativity into something positive. He might be able to help us identify risks we haven't considered.

upvoted 0 times

...