Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM CSM-001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 70 Discussion

Posted by Stephane on Apr 08, 2024 at 05:49 AM

How should the Product Backlog arranged?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium CSM-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
MI
Michal 11 months ago
Really? I thought effort level was more important.
SH
Sharika 11 months ago
Grouping by feature is also a solid approach.
PE
Pete 11 months ago
Wait, why would you sort by date? That seems off.
EL
Elza 12 months ago
Totally agree, priority first!
AV
Avery 12 months ago
I think sorting by business priority makes the most sense.
OT
Otis 12 months ago
I thought the focus should be on business priority, but I also remember something about sorting by effort. It's a bit confusing!
SH
Sherita 1 year ago
I feel like grouping by business category makes sense, but I can't recall if that's the most effective method.
SO
Sol 1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about backlog arrangement, and I think sorting by complexity was mentioned as a possible approach too.
LA
Lawanda 1 year ago
I think the Product Backlog should be sorted by business priority, but I'm not completely sure if that's the only way to do it.
AN
Andree 1 year ago
Grouping by business category or feature (D) could also be a useful approach to keep the Backlog organized.
JO
Joanna 1 year ago
Sorting by effort or complexity in descending order (A) seems like a good strategy to tackle the most important work first.
SH
Shelia 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review my notes on Product Backlog management.
SH
Shawna 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B - sorting by business priority is the best way to arrange the Product Backlog.
ME
Melita 1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
DY
Dyan 1 year ago
I've got this one figured out. A service template would be used to apply an identical QoS configuration to multiple CPEs (option B) and to apply a non-identical service configuration to multiple CPEs (option C). Those seem like the two main use cases to me.
MA
Malcom 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. It seems like upgrading System A is the most cost-effective option, but the 3-month downtime is a major concern. I think the key will be developing a solid strategy to minimize the impact on operations during that time.
RU
Ruby 1 year ago
I'm feeling a bit lost on this one. The military context adds an extra layer of complexity that I'll need to unpack. Let me think this through step-by-step.
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
Option B all the way! I don't want to be the one who has to explain to the stakeholders why we're building the wrong thing first.
LA
Lawrence 1 year ago
↳ replying to Freeman
B) Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
CO
Cory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Freeman
B) Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
NA
Nan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Freeman
B) Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
RO
Rosalind 1 year ago
↳ replying to Freeman
B) Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
HE
Helga 1 year ago
↳ replying to Freeman
B) Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
GE
German 1 year ago
↳ replying to Freeman
A) Product Backlog items should be sorted by level of effort or complexity in descending order.
ER
Erasmo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Freeman
A) Product Backlog items should be sorted by level of effort or complexity in descending order.
AL
Alyce 2 years ago
Grouping the backlog by category or feature makes sense, but it's not the best way to prioritize. B is the way to go.
FE
Fernanda 2 years ago
Haha, sorting by date? That's like arranging a to-do list chronologically instead of by importance. Not very Agile, is it?
AR
Art 1 year ago
↳ replying to Fernanda
B) Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
KA
Kathrine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Fernanda
A) Product Backlog items should be sorted by level of effort or complexity in descending order.
NU
Nu 2 years ago
I agree with Lisha. Prioritizing the backlog by business value is crucial for delivering the most important features first.
FE
Felicitas 2 years ago
I prefer grouping Product Backlog items by business category or feature. It helps in better organization.
LI
Lisha 2 years ago
Option B is the correct answer. The Product Backlog should be sorted by business priority, not by effort or complexity.
LY
Lyndia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lisha
Exactly, that way we can deliver the most valuable features first.
RO
Royal 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lisha
So, we should prioritize the backlog items based on their value to the business.
LU
Luz 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lisha
I agree, it helps the team focus on what is most important.
SH
Shawana 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lisha
I think the Product Backlog should be sorted by business priority.
LI
Lindsey 2 years ago
I agree with Shelba. It makes sense to prioritize based on business value.
SH
Shelba 2 years ago
I think Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel