New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM CSM-001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CSM-001 exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 1
[All CSM-001 Questions]

How should the Product Backlog arranged?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Stephane at Apr 08, 2024, 05:49 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSM-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Michal
3 months ago
Really? I thought effort level was more important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
3 months ago
Grouping by feature is also a solid approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
3 months ago
Wait, why would you sort by date? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
4 months ago
Totally agree, priority first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
4 months ago
I think sorting by business priority makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
4 months ago
I thought the focus should be on business priority, but I also remember something about sorting by effort. It's a bit confusing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
4 months ago
I feel like grouping by business category makes sense, but I can't recall if that's the most effective method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about backlog arrangement, and I think sorting by complexity was mentioned as a possible approach too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
5 months ago
I think the Product Backlog should be sorted by business priority, but I'm not completely sure if that's the only way to do it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
5 months ago
Grouping by business category or feature (D) could also be a useful approach to keep the Backlog organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
5 months ago
Sorting by effort or complexity in descending order (A) seems like a good strategy to tackle the most important work first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review my notes on Product Backlog management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B - sorting by business priority is the best way to arrange the Product Backlog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
5 months ago
I've got this one figured out. A service template would be used to apply an identical QoS configuration to multiple CPEs (option B) and to apply a non-identical service configuration to multiple CPEs (option C). Those seem like the two main use cases to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. It seems like upgrading System A is the most cost-effective option, but the 3-month downtime is a major concern. I think the key will be developing a solid strategy to minimize the impact on operations during that time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
5 months ago
I'm feeling a bit lost on this one. The military context adds an extra layer of complexity that I'll need to unpack. Let me think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
10 months ago
Option B all the way! I don't want to be the one who has to explain to the stakeholders why we're building the wrong thing first.
upvoted 0 times
Lawrence
8 months ago
B) Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
8 months ago
B) Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
9 months ago
B) Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
9 months ago
B) Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
9 months ago
B) Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
9 months ago
A) Product Backlog items should be sorted by level of effort or complexity in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
10 months ago
A) Product Backlog items should be sorted by level of effort or complexity in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyce
10 months ago
Grouping the backlog by category or feature makes sense, but it's not the best way to prioritize. B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
10 months ago
Haha, sorting by date? That's like arranging a to-do list chronologically instead of by importance. Not very Agile, is it?
upvoted 0 times
Art
10 months ago
B) Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
10 months ago
A) Product Backlog items should be sorted by level of effort or complexity in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nu
10 months ago
I agree with Lisha. Prioritizing the backlog by business value is crucial for delivering the most important features first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
11 months ago
I prefer grouping Product Backlog items by business category or feature. It helps in better organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
11 months ago
Option B is the correct answer. The Product Backlog should be sorted by business priority, not by effort or complexity.
upvoted 0 times
Lyndia
9 months ago
Exactly, that way we can deliver the most valuable features first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
9 months ago
So, we should prioritize the backlog items based on their value to the business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
10 months ago
I agree, it helps the team focus on what is most important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
10 months ago
I think the Product Backlog should be sorted by business priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lindsey
11 months ago
I agree with Shelba. It makes sense to prioritize based on business value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
11 months ago
I think Product Backlog items should be sorted by business priority in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel