MENU
To reduce the people or operator introduced defects into a process it is best if a Belt can design and implement a means of ________________ into the process.
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CLSSYB-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
LE
Leatha
6 months ago
A) Measurement automation is efficient and reliable.
NO
Nobuko
7 months ago
D) Constant supervision is impractical in the long run.
RE
Reuben
7 months ago
C) Full Automation sounds ideal, but it's expensive.
HY
Hyun
7 months ago
B) Operator alertness could work too, but it's not foolproof.
NO
Noe
7 months ago
I agree, it reduces human error.
ME
Melissa
7 months ago
I think A) Measurement automation is the best choice.
TR
Trina
8 months ago
Operator alertness is underrated, though!
HO
Hobert
8 months ago
Constant supervision can be a drag, but it helps.
SV
Svetlana
8 months ago
Full automation? Sounds risky...
TA
Tawna
8 months ago
Totally agree, less human error!
OC
Octavio
9 months ago
A) Measurement automation is key!
RA
Rashida
9 months ago
Haha, D is just asking for trouble. Constant supervision? No thanks, I'll pass on that one.
ET
Ethan
9 months ago
B seems like the easiest solution, but I'm not sure it's the most effective. Operator alertness is important, but not enough on its own.
KI
Kimberlie
9 months ago
Definitely option A. Measurement automation is key to reducing human error.
RA
Raelene
9 months ago
Operator alertness sounds important, but I wonder if it really addresses the root cause of defects like the other options might.
EL
Eladia
9 months ago
I feel like this question is similar to one we practiced about reducing human error. I think full automation could be the answer, but I'm not completely confident.
BA
Barney
10 months ago
Ooh, this is a good one. I think I'd go with measurement automation - that way you can catch issues early and make adjustments to the process as needed. Seems like the most proactive approach.
QU
Quiana
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Does "means of ________________" mean we need to fill in the blank? I'm leaning towards A or C, but I'm not totally confident.
KA
Kate
10 months ago
I think constant supervision might help, but it seems like it could be more of a temporary fix rather than a long-term solution.
RO
Rosendo
10 months ago
I remember we discussed how measurement automation can help reduce defects, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option here.
RI
Rima
11 months ago
I'd go with C. Full automation is the way to go if you really want to eliminate operator defects.
HA
Halina
11 months ago
Constant supervision doesn't seem like the most efficient solution. I'd probably go with measurement automation to help catch and prevent defects before they happen.
DA
Danica
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if full automation is the best solution - that could introduce other issues. Maybe a combination of measurement automation and operator alertness would work well.
CA
Cathrine
11 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on reducing defects introduced by people or operators. Measurement automation seems like the best approach to me.
SH
Shawnee
6 months ago
Operator alertness is important, but automation is the future!
NE
Nenita
6 months ago
Constant supervision can be a burden, not always effective.
SK
Skye
6 months ago
Full automation might be too much for some processes though.
CH
Chandra
6 months ago
Yes, it streamlines the process and reduces defects.
GE
Georgene
10 months ago
I agree, measurement automation can really help minimize human error.