GAQM Exam CLSSBB-001 Topic 2 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CLSSBB-001 exam

Question #: 67
Topic #: 2

What conclusion is most correct about the Experimental Design shown here with the response in the far right column?

ANo factor has enough statistical confidence greater than 95% to have an impact on the response rate

BConstant, Adv and Bev are the only factors statistically affecting the response rate with 95% confidence or more

CIf the Adv is increased from the low level to the high level, the response rate increases

DThe response level is statistically concluded to only need the Adv and Bev factors set at the low level to get the largest response rate

EThis design does not have enough experimental runs to conclude anything as evidenced by the lack of P-values in the MINITABTM output

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Kenneth at Mar 06, 2025, 06:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CLSSBB-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jacquelyne

16 days ago

Seriously, guys? You're all missing the point. The correct answer is clearly C - 'If the Adv is increased from the low level to the high level, the response rate increases.' What, did you think this was a trick question or something?

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

20 days ago

I've stared at this diagram for what feels like an eternity, and I still can't decide. Maybe I should just pick the answer that sounds the most convincing, or the one that has the most words. That's usually a safe bet, right?

upvoted 0 times

Marti

3 days ago

I think option B is the most convincing. It mentions three factors affecting the response rate with 95% confidence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delmy

2 months ago

Ha! Option E is my kind of answer. This design is clearly a hot mess, and I'm not about to waste my time trying to figure it out. Let's move on to the next question, shall we?

upvoted 0 times

Na

22 days ago

Yeah, option E seems like the best choice. Let's move on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecilia

24 days ago

I agree, this design seems confusing. Let's skip to the next question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tora

2 months ago

I'm leaning towards option B, but to be honest, I'm just guessing. This stuff looks like a foreign language to me. If only we had a MINITAB manual handy!

upvoted 0 times

...

Marshall

2 months ago

This question is a real brain-teaser! I'm not sure I even understand the experimental design, let alone the correct answer. Maybe we should ask the test-makers to simplify things a bit.

upvoted 0 times

Evette

10 hours ago

Good point. Maybe we should reconsider our choice and look at the data more closely.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anisha

1 days ago

But what about the lack of P-values in the MINITABTM output? Doesn't that affect the conclusion?

upvoted 0 times

...

Linn

7 days ago

I think option B makes the most sense based on the data shown.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

1 months ago

Let's break it down together, maybe we can figure it out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesse

2 months ago

But doesn't the lack of P-values in the MINITABTM output indicate that this design does not have enough experimental runs to draw any conclusions?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alpha

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct conclusion is C) If the Adv is increased from the low level to the high level, the response rate increases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesse

2 months ago

I think the correct conclusion is B) Constant, Adv and Bev are the only factors statistically affecting the response rate with 95% confidence or more.

upvoted 0 times

...