Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM Exam CLSSBB-001 Topic 2 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CLSSBB-001 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 2
[All CLSSBB-001 Questions]

What conclusion is most correct about the Experimental Design shown here with the response in the far right column?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jacquelyne
2 months ago
Seriously, guys? You're all missing the point. The correct answer is clearly C - 'If the Adv is increased from the low level to the high level, the response rate increases.' What, did you think this was a trick question or something?
upvoted 0 times
Derrick
21 days ago
Actually, I think D makes the most sense based on the data provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
22 days ago
I agree with the user, C seems to be the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 months ago
No way, A is the most accurate conclusion in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
1 months ago
Are you sure about that? I think B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Val
2 months ago
I've stared at this diagram for what feels like an eternity, and I still can't decide. Maybe I should just pick the answer that sounds the most convincing, or the one that has the most words. That's usually a safe bet, right?
upvoted 0 times
Lenita
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A. It seems like a safe bet since no factor has enough statistical confidence to impact the response rate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the correct conclusion. Increasing Adv leads to an increase in response rate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
2 months ago
I think option B is the most convincing. It mentions three factors affecting the response rate with 95% confidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delmy
3 months ago
Ha! Option E is my kind of answer. This design is clearly a hot mess, and I'm not about to waste my time trying to figure it out. Let's move on to the next question, shall we?
upvoted 0 times
Na
2 months ago
Yeah, option E seems like the best choice. Let's move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
2 months ago
I agree, this design seems confusing. Let's skip to the next question.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tora
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B, but to be honest, I'm just guessing. This stuff looks like a foreign language to me. If only we had a MINITAB manual handy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
3 months ago
This question is a real brain-teaser! I'm not sure I even understand the experimental design, let alone the correct answer. Maybe we should ask the test-makers to simplify things a bit.
upvoted 0 times
Evette
2 months ago
Good point. Maybe we should reconsider our choice and look at the data more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
2 months ago
But what about the lack of P-values in the MINITABTM output? Doesn't that affect the conclusion?
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense based on the data shown.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
3 months ago
Let's break it down together, maybe we can figure it out.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesse
3 months ago
But doesn't the lack of P-values in the MINITABTM output indicate that this design does not have enough experimental runs to draw any conclusions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct conclusion is C) If the Adv is increased from the low level to the high level, the response rate increases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
4 months ago
I think the correct conclusion is B) Constant, Adv and Bev are the only factors statistically affecting the response rate with 95% confidence or more.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel