Refer to the exhibit.

A FortiCNAPP administrator used the FortiCNAPP Explorer to reveal all hosts exposed to the internet that are running active packages with vulnerabilities of all severity levels. Why do only the first two results have an attack path? (Choose one answer)
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From FortiOS 7.6, FortiWeb 7.4 Exact Extract study guide:
Based on the FortiCNAPP (formerly Lacework) Cloud Security documentation regarding Attack Path Analysis and Explorer functionality:
Attack Path Generation (Option A): In FortiCNAPP, an 'Attack Path' is a visualized sequence of potential exploit steps that an external attacker could take to reach a sensitive resource. For the platform to generate and display an attack path, the target resource must be externally reachable.
Evidence in the Exhibit: * The exhibit shows a list of EC2 and GCP instances.
The first two results (Resource IDs i-0d2d... and i-0e29...) have values populated in the Public IP Addresses column (44.197.... and 3.226....). Consequently, these are the only two resources showing a value of 1 in the Attack Paths column.
The remaining resources in the list do not have public IP addresses listed in the exhibit's view, and as a result, their Attack Paths count is 0. This confirms that FortiCNAPP specifically calculates these paths for resources that have a direct entry point from the internet via a public IP.
Contextual Risk Assessment: FortiCNAPP prioritizes attack path analysis for internet-exposed assets because they represent the highest immediate risk. While internal resources may have vulnerabilities, the lack of a public-facing network interface means there is no direct external 'path' to visualize in this specific Explorer view.
Barbra
5 days agoAriel
10 days agoVon
15 days agoKenneth
20 days agoKyoko
25 days agoLashawnda
1 month agoGracie
1 month ago