Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6 Exam - Topic 3 Question 3 Discussion

Posted by Myong on Jan 25, 2026 at 02:46 PM

An administrator wanted to configure an IPS sensor to block traffic that triggers the signature set number of times during a specific time period. How can the administrator achieve the objective?

Suggested Answer: D

In FortiOS 7.6, if an administrator wants to block traffic only after an IPS signature is triggered a specific number of times within a defined time window, this must be done using IPS filters with rate-based settings.

Why option D is correct

IPS filters allow administrators to match signatures based on attributes such as:

Severity

Protocol

CVE

Signature ID

IPS filters support rate-based actions using:

rate-mode periodical

rate-count

rate-duration

With rate-mode periodical, FortiGate:

Counts how many times a signature is triggered

Within a defined time period

And applies the configured action (for example, block) once the threshold is exceeded

This directly matches the requirement:

''block traffic that triggers the signature set number of times during a specific time period.''

Why the other options are incorrect

A . IPS group signatures, set rate-mode 60 Group signatures do not provide the required per-period rate-based blocking logic.

B . IPS packet logging option Logging does not enforce blocking behavior.

C . IPS signatures, rate-mode periodical option Rate-based controls are applied via IPS filters, not directly on individual signature definitions.


Get Premium NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
RO
Rosenda 3 months ago
I’m leaning towards D. Filters can be really effective for blocking traffic.
CA
Caitlin 3 months ago
Option A could work too, but I feel it’s less specific about the time period.
RO
Romana 3 months ago
I agree, C makes sense. It’s clear and straightforward.
CA
Carline 4 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. It directly addresses the rate-mode requirement.
SI
Simona 5 months ago
Totally agree with A), it's straightforward and effective!
BI
Billye 5 months ago
Wait, can you really use B) for blocking? That seems off.
CR
Cristina 5 months ago
D) sounds like a solid option too, but not sure.
ER
Erinn 6 months ago
I think C) makes more sense for periodic checks.
AM
Amie 6 months ago
A) is the right choice for rate-limiting!
AL
Alba 6 months ago
C is the way to go. The other options don't seem to address the specific requirements mentioned in the question.
AL
Alayna 6 months ago
Haha, I bet the administrator is going to have a field day configuring this IPS sensor. C seems like the way to go, though.
MA
Martina 6 months ago
I'm pretty sure C is the right answer. Blocking traffic based on a signature set number of times during a specific time period sounds like the rate-mode periodical option.
HE
Herminia 6 months ago
The correct answer is definitely C. That's the only option that mentions using IPS signatures and the rate-mode periodical option.
BO
Bobbye 7 months ago
C) Use IPS signatures, rate-mode periodical option.
ST
Stephaine 7 months ago
I thought rate-mode was important, but I can't remember if it should be set to periodical or something else. Maybe A is the right choice?
PE
Penney 7 months ago
I'm leaning towards D, but I can't recall if filters are the right approach for blocking traffic based on signatures.
HU
Hubert 8 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to configure IPS settings, and I feel like the periodical option is key here.
RO
Rosann 8 months ago
I think the answer might be C, but I'm not entirely sure about the specifics of the rate-mode options.
LO
Louann 8 months ago
Ugh, I'm not sure about this one. The wording of the question and the options is a bit confusing to me. I might need to ask the instructor for some clarification before I commit to an answer. Trying to figure out the right approach here.
KE
Keva 8 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The question is straightforward, and option C looks like the best fit based on the details provided. I'll make sure to double-check my work, but I think I've got a good handle on how to approach this type of question.
SO
Sommer 8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is that the administrator wants to block traffic that triggers the signature set a certain number of times within a specific time period. Option C seems to address that by using the IPS signatures and a rate-mode periodical option, which would let you set the time period.
RA
Rasheeda 9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question is asking about blocking traffic based on a signature set, but the options don't seem to mention that directly. I'll need to re-read the question carefully and think through the options more.
LI
Ling 9 months ago
I think I'd go with option C. The question specifically mentions using IPS signatures and a rate-mode periodical option, so that seems like the most direct approach.
TR
Trinidad 2 months ago
↳ replying to Ling
I’m leaning towards option D though. It might offer more flexibility with filtering.
MA
Mabelle 3 months ago
↳ replying to Ling
Yeah, option C is straightforward. It focuses on the signatures needed.
TR
Trinidad 3 months ago
↳ replying to Ling
I agree, option C makes the most sense. It aligns perfectly with the requirements.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel