Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks F5CAB5 Exam - Topic 2 Question 2 Discussion

Posted by Catalina on Jan 24, 2026 at 12:40 AM

Due to a change in application requirements, a BIG-IP Administrator needs to modify the configuration of a Virtual Server to include a Fallback Persistence Profile. Which persistence profile type should the BIG-IP Administrator use for this purpose?

Suggested Answer: D

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From BIG-IP Administration S73upport and Troubleshooting documents: Persistence is critical for ensuring that a client's session remains with the same pool member throughout its duration. If primary persistence (like Cookie Persistence) fails---for instance, because the client has disabled cookies---load balancing will not work as expected, and the session may be broken. A 'Fallback Persistence Profile' provides a backup method75. The most common and reliable fallback method is 'Source Address Affinity'76. This method tracks the client's IP address in the BIG-IP's persistence table and ensures that any subsequent requests from that IP are routed to the same pool member, even if the primary persistence token is missing. Troubleshooting session drops often involves checking if a fallback method is configured to handle scenarios where the primary method is unsupported by the client's browser or environment. Without a fallback, the BIG-IP would revert to standard load balancing, potentially sending the client to a different server that lacks their session data.


Get Premium F5CAB5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
27 comments · newest first
RI
Rikki 3 months ago
I agree with D) Source Address Affinity. It’s straightforward and effective.
NO
Novella 3 months ago
A) SSL seems too specific for this case. Universal makes more sense.
LE
Lenna 4 months ago
I’m leaning towards D) Source Address Affinity. It’s reliable for session persistence.
CH
Chantell 4 months ago
I think it should be C) Universal. It fits multiple scenarios.
AN
Annita 4 months ago
Really? I didn’t know Universal was the best option here!
AR
Art 5 months ago
I’ve always used Universal for fallback, seems solid.
DY
Dylan 6 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? I thought it might be D) Source Address Affinity.
TH
Therese 6 months ago
Totally agree with that! Universal is the way to go.
JO
Johana 6 months ago
I think the right choice is C) Universal.
HA
Harrison 6 months ago
Source Address Affinity is the persistence profile type the BIG-IP Administrator should use.
VI
Vicente 6 months ago
Haha, imagine if the answer was "Unicorn" - that would be a real head-scratcher!
CO
Cory 6 months ago
SSL persistence profile? Nah, that's not what this question is asking for.
TE
Tequila 7 months ago
I'd go with the Hash persistence profile, it's a classic.
LY
Lynna 7 months ago
Universal persistence profile sounds like the right choice here.
SH
Shawana 7 months ago
Source Address Affinity is the way to go for a Fallback Persistence Profile.
PH
Phil 7 months ago
I feel like I saw a similar question where SSL was mentioned, but I can't recall if it was for fallback purposes or something else.
LE
Leslee 7 months ago
I'm a bit confused here; I thought Source Address Affinity was more about directing traffic based on IP addresses rather than fallback options.
LI
Lisbeth 8 months ago
I remember practicing a question about persistence profiles, and I think the Universal profile could be the right choice for fallback scenarios.
EL
Elenor 8 months ago
I think the Fallback Persistence Profile might be related to how sessions are handled, but I'm not entirely sure which type to choose.
LO
Lonna 8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the use case and the characteristics of each persistence profile to make the best choice.
DA
Darrel 9 months ago
The question mentions a "Fallback Persistence Profile", so I'm guessing we want something that can handle a wide range of traffic. I'd go with option C, Universal.
BE
Benedict 9 months ago
Source Address Affinity seems like it could work, since it's based on the client's IP address. But I'm not sure if that's the most appropriate option for this scenario.
YO
Yolande 9 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between the persistence profile options. I'll need to review the details of each one to determine the best fit.
LE
Leatha 9 months ago
I think the Universal persistence profile would be the best choice here, since it can handle a variety of traffic types.
LE
Lenna 3 months ago
↳ replying to Leatha
Universal can adapt better to different scenarios, though.
YO
Yolando 3 months ago
↳ replying to Leatha
But isn't Source Address Affinity more straightforward?
EL
Elvis 3 months ago
↳ replying to Leatha
I agree, Universal seems versatile.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel