Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks F5CAB4 Exam - Topic 4 Question 15 Discussion

Posted by Tawanna on Jul 20, 2026 at 09:59 AM

A local user account (Users) on the BIG-IP device is assigned the User Manager role. User1 attempts to modify the properties of another account (User2), but the action fails. The BIG-IP Administrator can successfully modify the User2 account. Assuming the principle of least privilege, what is the correct way to allow User1 to modify User2 properties?

Suggested Answer: D

In F5 TMOS, administrative roles and user permissions are partition-specific. The User Manager role allows an account to manage other user accounts, but this authority is restricted to the administrative partitions to which the User Manager has been granted access.

Partition Awareness: If User1 (the User Manager) attempts to modify User2 and fails, while the full Administrator succeeds, it indicates that User2 resides in a partition where User1 does not have management rights.

Principle of Least Privilege: This principle dictates that a user should be given only the minimum level of access necessary to perform their job functions.

Procedural Solution: Granting 'Administrator' privileges (Option B) would violate least privilege by giving User1 full control over all system settings and all partitions. Moving users between partitions (Options A and C) might disrupt the organizational security structure. The correct and most secure administrative action is to modify the partition access for User1 to include the partition where User2 is located. This enables User1 to manage User2's properties while maintaining their restricted role as a User Manager.


Get Premium F5CAB4 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
18 comments · newest first
IV
Ivory 4 days ago
Exactly! It's about balancing access and security.
MA
Marg 9 days ago
D keeps it safe while allowing necessary access.
BE
Berry 14 days ago
True, least privilege is key here.
MA
Marg 19 days ago
I agree with B. Granting too many privileges is risky.
BE
Berry 24 days ago
A could work too, but it feels less secure.
IV
Ivory 29 days ago
User1 needs access to User2's partition.
MA
Marg 1 month ago
Why D?
IV
Ivory 1 month ago
I think D is the best choice.
BE
Berry 1 month ago
This question is tricky.
JA
Jacqueline 2 months ago
Granting admin privileges seems like overkill for this situation.
KA
Kassandra 2 months ago
Wait, can User1 really modify User2 with just partition access?
GL
Glendora 2 months ago
Moving users around seems risky.
EL
Ellen 2 months ago
I think D is the right choice here!
CR
Cruz 2 months ago
User1 needs more access to modify User2.
SO
Solange 3 months ago
I feel like modifying partition access is the safest way to go, so D makes sense to me, but I could be wrong.
VI
Vivienne 3 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we practiced a similar one where user roles were involved. Granting admin privileges seems too broad though, so B might not be it.
AR
Arthur 3 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think moving User1 to the same partition as User2 could work, like option C?
MO
Mozell 3 months ago
I remember something about partition access being crucial for user permissions, so maybe D is the right choice?
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel