Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Exin CITM Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

During Post Implementation Review (PIR) of changes, it is lately concluded that an unusual high number of changes failed to meet their objectives. What is the most likely cause of this?
A) Lack of effort in assessing and evaluating change requests
B) Insufficient resources for change implementation
C) Change Advisory Board (CAB) meetings are not taking place
D) Insufficient budget allocation

Exin CITM Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's CITM exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 2
[All CITM Questions]

During Post Implementation Review (PIR) of changes, it is lately concluded that an unusual high number of changes failed to meet their objectives. What is the most likely cause of this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A high failure rate of changes during Post Implementation Review (PIR) in ITIL's change management process suggests a deficiency in the assessment and evaluation of change requests (A). Proper assessment involves analyzing risks, impacts, and feasibility before approving changes. If this step is inadequate (e.g., overlooking conflicts or underestimating impacts), changes are more likely to fail, as they may not align with objectives or be poorly planned.

Insufficient resources (B): May cause delays but is less directly tied to failed objectives compared to poor assessment.

CAB meetings not taking place (C): The CAB reviews changes, but the scenario doesn't indicate meetings are absent; poor assessment can occur even with CAB involvement.

Insufficient budget (D): May limit implementation but is less likely the primary cause of failed objectives.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Yuki
1 day ago
C is crucial. Without CAB, we miss key insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
7 days ago
B is a big issue. Without resources, nothing works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
12 days ago
A makes sense. Rushing leads to poor evaluations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorcas
17 days ago
D could be a factor too. Budget cuts hurt implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
22 days ago
C seems likely. If CAB meetings aren't happening, chaos follows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
27 days ago
I lean towards B. We often lack the right resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
1 month ago
I think it's A. People just don't assess changes properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
1 month ago
I’m not so sure about A. Sometimes it’s just bad planning overall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olene
1 month ago
D is the real issue here. Without proper funding, nothing works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 months ago
Wait, could it really be C? I thought CAB meetings were mandatory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
2 months ago
Totally agree with B. We never have enough resources for these projects!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
2 months ago
I think it's definitely A. People just rush through the assessments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards insufficient budget allocation, but I can't recall if we covered how that directly affects change objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
2 months ago
Didn't we have a practice question about CAB meetings? I feel like if those aren't happening, it could definitely impact the success of changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
2 months ago
I think insufficient resources might be a big factor too, especially if the team is stretched thin.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
3 months ago
I remember discussing how lack of effort in assessing change requests could lead to failures, but I'm not sure if that's the only reason.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel