New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Exin ASM Exam - Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's ASM exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 2
[All ASM Questions]

You are the Scrum Master on a project to develop machine parts for automobile manufacturing. The Product

Owner on your project proposes to use Utility Function to find out the stakeholders' risk tolerance level. Which

of the following is NOT a risk tolerance classification?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Solange at Mar 06, 2024, 06:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ASM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kris
3 months ago
Risk Averter and Risk Seeker are the main ones, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
3 months ago
Neutral Risk Taker? That's a new one for me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds kinda legit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
4 months ago
Totally agree, I've never heard of that one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
4 months ago
Risk Mitigator isn't a real classification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorriane
4 months ago
I’m confused about this one. I thought all four options were valid classifications, but now I’m second-guessing "Neutral Risk Taker."
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify risk types, and I feel like "Risk Mitigator" doesn't fit with the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
4 months ago
I think "Risk Averter" and "Risk Seeker" are definitely classifications, but "Neutral Risk Taker" sounds a bit off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
5 months ago
I remember studying risk tolerance classifications, but I'm not entirely sure about "Risk Mitigator" being one of them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
5 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I remember learning about the different risk tolerance levels in class. I'm pretty confident I can identify the one that's not a standard classification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
5 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. The risk tolerance classifications can be a bit confusing, so I'll need to review my notes carefully to make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
5 months ago
I've seen questions like this before, so I think I've got a good handle on the different risk tolerance types. I'll just need to double-check my understanding before selecting the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
5 months ago
Okay, let me see here. I know the main ones are risk averse, risk seeking, and risk neutral. But I'm not sure if "risk mitigator" is a standard classification or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different risk tolerance classifications to determine which one is not included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about Jaeger and Zipkin, but I'm not sure about the third one. I'll make sure to read the question carefully and eliminate any options that don't seem to fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
5 months ago
I think we had a practice question that mentioned shareholders and board members. They seem like obvious choices to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
5 months ago
I've got a good strategy for this - I'll focus on identifying any traffic that is leaving the instance or cloud environment, since that's what the question is asking for. A, B, and E seem to fit that criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. The ordinance is clear, but the event seems really important. I wonder if there's a way to grant a temporary variance or exception in a case like this? I'll need to review the ordinance and see what my options are.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
10 months ago
Well, this is a tough one. 'Risk Mitigator' does sound like it could be a thing, but I guess the Scrum Masters have their own special lingo. Time to brush up on my Scrum vocabulary!
upvoted 0 times
Karima
9 months ago
C) Risk Mitigator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
9 months ago
B) Risk Seeker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
9 months ago
A) Risk Averter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marci
10 months ago
Aha, I think I've got it! 'Risk Mitigator' is not a risk tolerance classification. Gotta keep those Scrum Master terms straight, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Hollis
8 months ago
Laila: Risk Averter, Risk Seeker, and Neutral Risk Taker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
9 months ago
User 3: So what are the other classifications then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
9 months ago
User 2: That's correct, it's important to understand the different classifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
9 months ago
User 1: I agree, 'Risk Mitigator' is not a risk tolerance classification.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Risk Seeker could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Neutral Risk Taker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
11 months ago
Hmm, 'Risk Mitigator' does sound like it could be a valid classification. But hey, at least they didn't include 'Risk Junkies' as an option - that would've been a real head-scratcher!
upvoted 0 times
Joni
10 months ago
B) Risk Seeker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
10 months ago
A) Risk Averter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
William
11 months ago
I think the answer is C) Risk Mitigator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
11 months ago
This is a tricky one! I thought 'Risk Mitigator' was a risk tolerance classification, but I guess I was mistaken. Gotta be careful with these Scrum Master questions.
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
9 months ago
D) Neutral Risk Taker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
9 months ago
C) Risk Mitigator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
9 months ago
B) Risk Seeker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
10 months ago
A) Risk Averter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel