Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Exin ASM Exam - Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Posted by Solange on Mar 06, 2024 at 06:43 PM

You are the Scrum Master on a project to develop machine parts for automobile manufacturing. The Product

Owner on your project proposes to use Utility Function to find out the stakeholders' risk tolerance level. Which

of the following is NOT a risk tolerance classification?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium ASM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
KR
Kris 11 months ago
Risk Averter and Risk Seeker are the main ones, for sure.
JU
Justine 11 months ago
Neutral Risk Taker? That's a new one for me!
ME
Melissia 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds kinda legit.
MA
Maybelle 11 months ago
Totally agree, I've never heard of that one!
HO
Holley 12 months ago
Risk Mitigator isn't a real classification.
LO
Lorriane 12 months ago
I’m confused about this one. I thought all four options were valid classifications, but now I’m second-guessing "Neutral Risk Taker."
FE
Felix 12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify risk types, and I feel like "Risk Mitigator" doesn't fit with the others.
AL
Alida 1 year ago
I think "Risk Averter" and "Risk Seeker" are definitely classifications, but "Neutral Risk Taker" sounds a bit off to me.
AL
Alysa 1 year ago
I remember studying risk tolerance classifications, but I'm not entirely sure about "Risk Mitigator" being one of them.
LA
Lachelle 1 year ago
Ah, this is a good one. I remember learning about the different risk tolerance levels in class. I'm pretty confident I can identify the one that's not a standard classification.
CA
Casandra 1 year ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. The risk tolerance classifications can be a bit confusing, so I'll need to review my notes carefully to make sure I don't miss anything.
SK
Skye 1 year ago
I've seen questions like this before, so I think I've got a good handle on the different risk tolerance types. I'll just need to double-check my understanding before selecting the answer.
CO
Corazon 1 year ago
Okay, let me see here. I know the main ones are risk averse, risk seeking, and risk neutral. But I'm not sure if "risk mitigator" is a standard classification or not.
YU
Yuki 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different risk tolerance classifications to determine which one is not included.
ME
Merrilee 1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about Jaeger and Zipkin, but I'm not sure about the third one. I'll make sure to read the question carefully and eliminate any options that don't seem to fit.
LI
Lindsey 1 year ago
I think we had a practice question that mentioned shareholders and board members. They seem like obvious choices to me.
DE
Denna 1 year ago
I've got a good strategy for this - I'll focus on identifying any traffic that is leaving the instance or cloud environment, since that's what the question is asking for. A, B, and E seem to fit that criteria.
AL
Alva 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. The ordinance is clear, but the event seems really important. I wonder if there's a way to grant a temporary variance or exception in a case like this? I'll need to review the ordinance and see what my options are.
LA
Laurene 1 year ago
Well, this is a tough one. 'Risk Mitigator' does sound like it could be a thing, but I guess the Scrum Masters have their own special lingo. Time to brush up on my Scrum vocabulary!
KA
Karima 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laurene
C) Risk Mitigator.
DE
Delisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laurene
B) Risk Seeker.
TA
Tandra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laurene
A) Risk Averter.
MA
Marci 1 year ago
Aha, I think I've got it! 'Risk Mitigator' is not a risk tolerance classification. Gotta keep those Scrum Master terms straight, you know?
HO
Hollis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marci
Laila: Risk Averter, Risk Seeker, and Neutral Risk Taker.
PE
Pearly 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marci
User 3: So what are the other classifications then?
LA
Laila 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marci
User 2: That's correct, it's important to understand the different classifications.
JE
Jettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marci
User 1: I agree, 'Risk Mitigator' is not a risk tolerance classification.
JU
Junita 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Risk Seeker could also be a valid option.
CO
Coral 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Neutral Risk Taker.
GA
Gail 2 years ago
Hmm, 'Risk Mitigator' does sound like it could be a valid classification. But hey, at least they didn't include 'Risk Junkies' as an option - that would've been a real head-scratcher!
JO
Joni 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gail
B) Risk Seeker.
LE
Lelia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gail
A) Risk Averter.
WI
William 2 years ago
I think the answer is C) Risk Mitigator.
KR
Kris 2 years ago
This is a tricky one! I thought 'Risk Mitigator' was a risk tolerance classification, but I guess I was mistaken. Gotta be careful with these Scrum Master questions.
LU
Luisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kris
D) Neutral Risk Taker.
TE
Tequila 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kris
C) Risk Mitigator.
BA
Barney 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kris
B) Risk Seeker.
MI
Micaela 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kris
A) Risk Averter.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel