MENU
Which of the following is true about a Prioritized Product Backlog?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium ASM Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
MA
Marta
11 months ago
B is spot on! Risky items can lead to great rewards.
EL
Elouise
11 months ago
D makes sense, interlinking helps with flow between Sprints.
CO
Corazon
11 months ago
Wait, C sounds off. How can you rule out uncertainty in a backlog?
AS
Ashton
11 months ago
I disagree with A. The most valuable stories should be on top, risks can be managed.
YV
Yvonne
12 months ago
B is definitely true! Higher value = higher priority.
LA
Larae
12 months ago
I recall a practice question about Sprint planning, and I think interlinking User Stories is important for overall project success, so D might be relevant.
SH
Shannan
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about option C; I thought some level of uncertainty is always present in a Risk-adjusted Prioritized Product Backlog.
DO
Dominga
1 year ago
I think option B makes sense because we learned that higher value items can be riskier but still need to be prioritized.
PE
Pete
1 year ago
I remember discussing how the most valuable User Stories should actually be prioritized at the top, but I’m not sure if that means they’re always the safest choice.
LU
Lucina
1 year ago
I think the key here is understanding the purpose of the Prioritized Product Backlog. It's about maximizing value, so riskier but more valuable items should be prioritized higher.
RO
Rochell
1 year ago
Option D seems a bit off to me. I don't think the User Stories in a Sprint need to be linked to the ones in subsequent Sprints. That's not how Scrum works, right?
ME
Merissa
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between a Prioritized Product Backlog and a Risk-adjusted Prioritized Product Backlog. I'll need to review my notes on that.
OL
Oliva
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B. The Prioritized Product Backlog should have the most valuable items at the top, even if they are riskier.
NI
Nina
1 year ago
This is a good opportunity to showcase my XSLT skills. I'll be sure to thoroughly test the transformation and validate the output against the schema.
KA
Kattie
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure this is about denormalization, where you combine tables back together after breaking them apart during normalization.
AN
Anissa
1 year ago
I remember we discussed deterioration mechanisms in class, and how they really impact the probability of failure. I'm torn between A and B.
CH
Chara
1 year ago
A is a bit too conservative, don't you think? Where's the fun in playing it safe?
EL
Elli
1 year ago
Lajuana: That's true, taking some risks can lead to greater rewards.
LA
Lajuana
1 year ago
User 2: B) Greater value items, although potentially riskier, are given higher priority in a Prioritized Product Backlog.
MA
Margart
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, playing it safe is no fun.
MI
Mi
1 year ago
C is definitely wrong. Uncertainty is like the spice of life, you can't just rule it out!
RU
Ruby
1 year ago
D) For a Sprint to succeed, User Stories picked for a Sprint should be interlinked with those selected for subsequent Sprints.
LA
Lashunda
1 year ago
C) Uncertainty should be ruled out of the Risk-adjusted Prioritized Product Backlog.
GE
German
1 year ago
B) Greater value items, although potentially riskier, are given higher priority in a Prioritized Product Backlog.
VI
Vilma
1 year ago
A) A Prioritized Product Backlog should not have the most valuable User Story on top, because it could be risky.
AL
Alexia
1 year ago
I'm gonna have to go with D on this one. Doesn't make sense to pick User Stories that aren't connected to the bigger picture.
LA
Laura
2 years ago
Option B sounds right to me. The whole point of a Prioritized Product Backlog is to focus on the highest value items, even if they're a bit riskier.
LO
Lonny
1 year ago
User 2: Yes, that's true. It helps us focus on delivering the most value to the customer.
SO
Sonia
1 year ago
User 1: Option B is correct. We prioritize higher value items in the Product Backlog.
CA
Carol
2 years ago
But doesn't prioritizing higher value items make more sense?
KA
Karan
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it's D.
CA
Carol
2 years ago
I think the answer is B.