Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Exin ASM Exam - Topic 11 Question 67 Discussion

A company develops a new children's education suite. The product contains four applications:- an application for learning how to read- an application for learning to count- an application to tram basic addition and subtraction- an application for parents or teachers to accompany the children's applicationsAll the product's applications are interdependent and must integrate with one another The company will be using a Nexus to scale the projectWhat is the best way to scale the product backlog?
B) Create a product backlog for each technological layer that handles integration
A) Create a product backlog and set of product backlog items for each application
C) Create a single product backlog and appoint a Product Owner for each application
D) Create a single product backlog and appoint a single Product Owner for the product

Exin ASM Exam - Topic 11 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's ASM exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 11
[All ASM Questions]

A company develops a new children's education suite. The product contains four applications:

- an application for learning how to read

- an application for learning to count

- an application to tram basic addition and subtraction

- an application for parents or teachers to accompany the children's applications

All the product's applications are interdependent and must integrate with one another The company will be using a Nexus to scale the project

What is the best way to scale the product backlog?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Joseph at Jul 18, 2024, 08:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ASM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Anika
8 months ago
Not sure a single backlog will handle all the dependencies effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
8 months ago
Each app needs its own backlog, so A seems right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
8 months ago
Surprised they didn't mention user testing in the backlog!
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
8 months ago
I disagree, option C could work better with separate focus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
9 months ago
I think option D makes the most sense for alignment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
9 months ago
I recall that having a single Product Owner can streamline decision-making, but I wonder if that would work well with such different applications. Option D seems logical, but I have my doubts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
9 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where integrating components was key. I lean towards option C, but I'm not completely confident about having multiple Product Owners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like having separate backlogs for each application could help manage priorities better. Maybe option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
9 months ago
I remember we discussed how interdependent applications might benefit from a single backlog to avoid misalignment. So, I think option D could be a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
9 months ago
I think the key here is balancing the need for individual app ownership with the overall product integration. Option C of a single backlog with separate POs could work, but I'm not sure how well that scales. Lots to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
9 months ago
I'm not sure - option A of having a separate backlog for each app seems simpler, but I'm worried that could make the integration harder to manage. Hmm, tough call.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
9 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'd want to think through the interdependencies between the applications and how that impacts the backlog structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
10 months ago
Okay, let's see. Since the apps are all interconnected, I'm leaning towards option B - creating a backlog for each tech layer that handles the integration. That way we can focus on the shared functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to review my notes on bank security measures to decide if this is true or false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
10 months ago
I remember practicing with similar questions, and I feel like Custom rules might work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The IGMP settings seem pretty technical, and I'm not super familiar with the details. I'll have to read through it a few times to make sure I understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
1 year ago
Wait, they're using a Nexus to scale this project? I hope they've got some good plumbers on the team to handle all that pipe integration!
upvoted 0 times
Murray
1 year ago
D) Create a single product backlog and appoint a single Product Owner for the product
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 year ago
C) Create a single product backlog and appoint a Product Owner for each application
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
1 year ago
B) Create a product backlog for each technological layer that handles integration
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
1 year ago
A) Create a product backlog and set of product backlog items for each application
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorriane
1 year ago
Option A sounds like a lot of overhead to manage. Four separate backlogs? Yikes, that's gotta be a nightmare to coordinate!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards B. Focusing the backlog on the integration layers could help ensure the whole suite works seamlessly together.
upvoted 0 times
Leslee
1 year ago
Agreed, focusing on integration will be key for the success of the children's education suite.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
1 year ago
Creating a product backlog for each technological layer sounds like a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
I think B is a good choice. It's important to prioritize the integration layers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carin
1 year ago
Option D seems a bit risky, having a single Product Owner for the entire product. Might be better to have individual owners for each app to ensure they get the attention they need.
upvoted 0 times
Mickie
1 year ago
A: That's true, it would help in managing the interdependencies between the applications more effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
1 year ago
B: I think creating a product backlog for each technological layer that handles integration could also be a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
1 year ago
A: I agree, having individual Product Owners for each application would ensure they get the attention they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lou
1 year ago
Hmm, I think option C is the way to go. Separating the product backlog by application makes the most sense since they're all interdependent.
upvoted 0 times
Eden
1 year ago
That's true, it could help ensure that each application gets the attention it needs for successful integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
1 year ago
I see your point, but having separate Product Owners could lead to better specialization and attention to detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be more efficient to have a single Product Owner for the entire product?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
1 year ago
I agree, having a Product Owner for each application would ensure focus and accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annelle
1 year ago
That's an interesting perspective. I can see how having a single Product Owner for each application could ensure better focus and coordination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe creating a single product backlog and appointing a Product Owner for each application would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
1 year ago
I think the best way to scale the product backlog is to create a product backlog for each technological layer that handles integration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel