Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Exin ASF Exam - Topic 12 Question 70 Discussion

Posted by Osvaldo on Sep 19, 2024 at 05:30 AM

A team estimates a Story using the Planning Poker technique. The team decides to allocate five Story points to the Story, because the Developers estimated two points and the Testers estimated three points.

Which statement is true regarding this scenario?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium ASF Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
VE
Verona 11 months ago
The Product Owner should definitely be part of the conversation!
AL
Alaine 11 months ago
Wait, are points really never estimated beforehand? That sounds off.
TI
Tijuana 11 months ago
I thought points were for the whole Story, not just parts of it.
LO
Lorrine 11 months ago
Totally agree, the team should be involved in the estimation!
DE
Deangelo 12 months ago
Story points are always a team decision, not just the Scrum Master.
SA
Sang 12 months ago
I vaguely remember something about involving the Product Owner in estimates, but I can't recall if it's crucial for this scenario. Option D might be a possibility.
CA
Carlee 12 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question like this before, and I don't recall points being predetermined, so option C seems wrong to me.
SK
Skye 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I think points are assigned for the whole Story, not just parts of it, which might make option B true.
LA
Latanya 1 year ago
I remember that in Planning Poker, the team collectively estimates the Story points, so I think option A is definitely incorrect.
YO
Yolando 1 year ago
I think the answer is B. The team collectively decides on the story points, not the Scrum Master. And the points are assigned to the overall story, not individual parts. I'm feeling good about this one.
MY
Myra 1 year ago
I'm not totally confident on this one. The wording about the Developers and Testers estimating different points is throwing me off. I'll have to review my Agile knowledge before answering.
MA
Marya 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking about the correct statement regarding the scenario, and based on my understanding of Agile practices, the answer is B. The points are assigned for the overall story, not for individual parts.
GE
Gearldine 1 year ago
Hmm, this one seems straightforward. I think the key is understanding how Planning Poker works - the team collectively decides on the estimate, not the Scrum Master or anyone else.
MI
Mirta 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I know Planning Poker is used to estimate stories, but I'm not sure about the details of how the points are assigned. I'll have to think this through carefully.
HO
Howard 2 years ago
Ha, the Scrum Master allocating points? That's a good one. The team decides on the estimate together.
AN
Andra 2 years ago
↳ replying to Howard
Ha, the Scrum Master allocating points? That's a good one. The team decides on the estimate together.
TR
Trinidad 2 years ago
↳ replying to Howard
B) Points are assigned for the overall Story, not for parts of the Story.
CA
Carma 2 years ago
↳ replying to Howard
A) Points are assigned by the Scrum Master, not by the team.
WA
Walker 2 years ago
But what about option D? Shouldn't the team consult the Product Owner?
CH
Chanel 2 years ago
I agree with Von, points are assigned for the overall Story.
BR
Brandon 2 years ago
D) Definitely not, the Product Owner should be involved in the estimation process. How else will they know what to prioritize?
LI
Ligia 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about C) - I thought estimates were meant to be flexible and could change over time. Seems like a rigid way to do it.
BR
Brittni 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ligia
D: Definitely, it's all about the collective effort of the team.
DE
Delsie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ligia
C: Yeah, I think it's more about the big picture than individual parts.
PH
Phung 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ligia
B: I agree with A, it's important to consider the overall Story when assigning points.
JA
Jacqueline 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ligia
A: B) Points are assigned for the overall Story, not for parts of the Story.
NO
Noah 2 years ago
B) Points are assigned for the overall Story, not for parts of the Story. That's how Planning Poker works - the team discusses and agrees on the overall effort for the Story.
CH
Charlene 2 years ago
↳ replying to Noah
A: It helps us to have a shared understanding of the work involved.
MO
Mona 2 years ago
↳ replying to Noah
B: Exactly, it's about the collective estimate of the team.
RO
Rosalind 2 years ago
↳ replying to Noah
A: That's right, we assign points for the overall Story in Planning Poker.
VO
Von 2 years ago
I think the answer is B.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel