Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Exin ASF Exam - Topic 10 Question 55 Discussion

A team has eleven members spread over two locations across two time zones. One of the locations has six team members and the other team has five.Where should a Scrum Master be located?
B) Appoint a local Scrum Master for both teams.
A) Alternate the Scrum Master between both locations.
C) The Scrum Master is located in one of the teams.

Exin ASF Exam - Topic 10 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's ASF exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 10
[All ASF Questions]

A team has eleven members spread over two locations across two time zones. One of the locations has six team members and the other team has five.

Where should a Scrum Master be located?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Rosio at Mar 20, 2024, 11:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ASF Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jeannine
6 months ago
I disagree, having a Scrum Master in one location could lead to bias.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
6 months ago
Wait, can one person really handle two teams effectively?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
7 months ago
Definitely should have one Scrum Master per location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
7 months ago
Alternating sounds like a logistical nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
7 months ago
I think appointing a local Scrum Master for both teams makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
7 months ago
I’m a bit torn; I feel like having the Scrum Master in one location could limit their effectiveness with the other team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question where having a dedicated Scrum Master was emphasized, so I’m leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
8 months ago
I think alternating the Scrum Master might create confusion, but it could also help balance the needs of both teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
8 months ago
I remember discussing how having a local Scrum Master could help with communication, but I'm not sure if that means we should appoint one for each team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
8 months ago
The key here is to ensure the Scrum Master is accessible to both teams, so I think the best approach is to have a local Scrum Master for each team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure if the Scrum Master should be located in one of the teams or if they should be alternating. I'll need to review the Scrum principles again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the right answer is to alternate the Scrum Master between the two locations. That way, everyone gets equal access to the Scrum Master.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each option carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
8 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this, but I think the best approach might be to have a local Scrum Master for each team to ensure they get the support they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know it has something to do with load balancing, but I'm not totally clear on the details. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover a range of different ITIL processes and activities. I'll need to think carefully about which one best represents the typical activities of the Strategy to Portfolio Value Stream.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
8 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The output from a pipeline execution could be in the Activity Log, a file in the output folder, or potentially in the debug log. I'm leaning towards option B, but I want to double-check the details to make sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 year ago
I'd suggest option B, but make sure the Scrum Masters have a strong communication channel between them. Otherwise, they might end up playing a game of 'Hot Potato' with the team issues.
upvoted 0 times
Ozell
11 months ago
C: Maybe we can have regular sync-ups between the Scrum Masters to keep everyone on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
12 months ago
B: Agreed, but we need to ensure they communicate effectively to avoid any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
12 months ago
A: I think we should go with option B and have a local Scrum Master for each team.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lottie
1 year ago
Option A sounds like a recipe for a Scrum Master's nightmare. Imagine trying to keep up with two teams in different time zones. That's like trying to catch two chickens with one hand!
upvoted 0 times
Nicolette
12 months ago
C) The Scrum Master is located in one of the teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
12 months ago
Option A sounds like a recipe for a Scrum Master's nightmare. Imagine trying to keep up with two teams in different time zones. That's like trying to catch two chickens with one hand!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
12 months ago
B) Appoint a local Scrum Master for both teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
1 year ago
A) Alternate the Scrum Master between both locations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christiane
1 year ago
Alternating the Scrum Master between locations seems like a lot of unnecessary back-and-forth. Why not just have one Scrum Master dedicated to the whole team? That's what option C suggests.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Effie
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the best choice. The Scrum Master should be located with one of the teams to ensure they can be fully immersed in the daily activities and provide the necessary support.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
1 year ago
I think option B is the way to go. Having a local Scrum Master for each team will ensure they can be fully dedicated to their respective teams and deal with any time zone issues effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
1 year ago
I disagree. I think we should alternate the Scrum Master between both locations to ensure equal support for both teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
I agree with Catina. Having the Scrum Master in one of the teams can help with better communication and coordination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
1 year ago
I think the Scrum Master should be located in one of the teams.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel