New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Esri EADP19-001 Exam - Topic 6 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 6
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

An ArcGIS user runs the Central Feature geoprocessing tool on a polygon feature class. The output feature is far north of the center of the feature class

Why Is the output feature off center of the feature class?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Fernanda at Mar 20, 2023, 07:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EADP19-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kristeen
4 months ago
I’ve seen this happen before, definitely check the weights if they’re not set!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
4 months ago
Wait, is it really possible for D to be the reason? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
4 months ago
C is a possibility too, but I’m not sure how that affects the output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
5 months ago
I disagree, B seems more likely. Larger polygons would definitely pull the center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
5 months ago
I think option A makes sense. More polygons up north could shift the center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
5 months ago
I vaguely recall something about projection issues affecting the output, but I can't remember if that relates to option C or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the feature class was off-center due to the distribution of features. I wonder if option A is the answer here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think if there’s no weight field specified, it might default to something that skews the center. That could relate to option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
5 months ago
I remember something about how the size and distribution of polygons can affect the central feature calculation, so maybe option B could be right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
5 months ago
I vaguely recall that if a weight field isn't specified, it could lead to unexpected results, so D might be worth considering as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like if the data frame and feature class aren't aligned, that could definitely throw things off, which makes C seem plausible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
5 months ago
I think I practiced a question like this where the size of polygons mattered, so B could be a possibility too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
5 months ago
I remember something about how the distribution of polygons can affect the central feature, so maybe A is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. We need to configure ItemA to ensure the buying rules are implemented, and the business has decided to stop buying ItemA ConfigB into Site2. I think the key here is to figure out how to control the availability of the different configurations at the different sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
5 months ago
Assist, Boxer, Tunnel, or Content - this is a tough one. I'm going to have to carefully consider the details of each option to make the best guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know nmap can do OS detection, but I'm not sure if that's the specific purpose of TCP/IP stack fingerprinting. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel