New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri EADP19-001 Exam - Topic 6 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 6
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

An ArcGIS user finds consistently returned low matches tor addresses which refer to "River" abbreviated as "RVER". In order to improve their matches the "RVER" abbreviation needs to be added to the xml file in the geocoding rule base.

Which two tools can be used to ensure these changes will be reflected before performing a new geocode? {Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kenny
4 months ago
I thought the Rematch Addresses tool would help too, but maybe not?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
4 months ago
Totally agree with Whitney, rebuilding is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
4 months ago
Wait, can you really just add "RVER" and expect it to work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
5 months ago
I think the Create Address Locator tool is also a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
5 months ago
You need to use the Rebuild Address Locator tool for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
5 months ago
I definitely recall that the Rebuild Address Locator tool is crucial after updates, but I can't remember if we discussed the Standardize Addresses tool in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
5 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I remember the Rematch Addresses tool being mentioned. But I'm not confident if it's the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the Create Address Locator tool could also be relevant here. It seems like it might help with the new abbreviation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
5 months ago
I remember we talked about the importance of rebuilding the address locator after making changes to the geocoding rules. I think that might be one of the tools we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure on this one. I know the IS-IS parameters can impact the neighbor relationship, but I'm not 100% confident on which specific ones trigger a re-establishment. I'll have to review my notes carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to focus on the transactional functions and the data attributes involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
5 months ago
Okay, I think I have an idea. Option B sounds like it could be the right answer - a privacy mask that changes shape depending on the angle of view. That seems to fit the "3D" part of the question.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel