Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Esri Exam EADP19-001 Topic 5 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 5
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

When rematching geocoding results, a user notices that E St Is being interpreted as East St. How snould a user resolve this Issue for future geocoding?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

by Lettie at Jan 22, 2024, 03:10 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EADP19-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Carma
19 days ago
Option B is the way to go. Rebuilding the address locator with new reference data is the only way to ensure the issue is fully resolved. Anything else is just a band-aid, and we all know how well those work in the real world.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
20 days ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is laughing at us right now. 'E' for east, seriously? That's like naming your kid 'U' and expecting everyone to know it's pronounced 'you'. Option D all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
26 days ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Creating a composite address locator that doesn't recognize 'E' as 'east' sounds like a more robust and future-proof solution to me. Who knows what other abbreviations might cause issues down the line?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
1 months ago
Option D seems like the easiest solution. Why go through the hassle of recreating the address locator or messing with the XML files when you can just fix the input table? Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
20 days ago
I agree, changing E to east in the input table is definitely the most efficient way to resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
20 days ago
User 1: Option D is definitely the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
29 days ago
Option D seems like the easiest solution. Why go through the hassle of recreating the address locator or messing with the XML files when you can just fix the input table? Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelle
1 months ago
I think we should also consider changing E to east in the input table before geocoding. It could help in resolving the issue more effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
2 months ago
I agree with Ben. That way, we can avoid the issue of E being interpreted as East.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
2 months ago
I think the best option is to create a composite address locator where E is not recognized as east.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 months ago
I think we should also consider changing E to east in the input table before geocoding. It could help in resolving the issue more effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
2 months ago
I agree with Cheryll. That way, we can avoid the issue of E being interpreted as East.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
2 months ago
I think the best option is to create a composite address locator where E is not recognized as east.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel