Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Ericsson ECP-206 Exam - Topic 2 Question 28 Discussion

Posted by Katina on Sep 18, 2024 at 03:50 PM

What does an LDP implicit null label cause?

Get Premium ECP-206 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
FR
Franklyn 10 months ago
Nope, definitely not that! It's about swapping labels.
CA
Catarina 11 months ago
I thought it was about forwarding the packet unchanged.
CH
Chauncey 11 months ago
Wait, is it really just that? Seems too simple.
CI
Ciara 11 months ago
Totally agree with that!
TH
Theresia 11 months ago
It causes penultimate hop popping by a downstream router.
GO
Goldie 12 months ago
I vaguely recall that it has to do with the penultimate hop popping, but I can't remember if it's upstream or downstream.
HA
Hana 12 months ago
I feel like the answer might be about forwarding the packet unchanged, but that doesn't seem right for implicit null.
EM
Emily 12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think it was about how the implicit null label affects packet forwarding.
DI
Dierdre 1 year ago
I think the implicit null label is related to penultimate hop popping, but I'm not sure if it's upstream or downstream.
FE
Fernanda 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I know LDP is related to MPLS, but I'm not sure about the specifics of implicit null labels and how they affect packet forwarding. I'll have to do some quick review of MPLS concepts before answering this.
LE
Leota 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. An LDP implicit null label causes penultimate hop popping by a downstream router. I remember learning about this in class, where the downstream router removes the label and forwards the packet based on the IP destination address. I'm confident that's the right answer.
CA
Cathern 1 year ago
I'm not too sure about this one. The question seems to be asking about LDP implicit null labels, but I'm not familiar with the specifics of how those work. I'll have to think this through carefully.
CO
Coral 1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think it has to do with how the label is handled by downstream routers, but I'm not sure if it's popping the label or forwarding it unchanged. I'll have to review my notes on LDP to figure this out.
JO
Jordan 2 years ago
I'm just going to go with B. Penultimate hop popping by a downstream router sounds like the most sensible option to me.
GA
Gail 2 years ago
Wait, is there a trick question here? I thought LDP implicit null labels were supposed to make things easier, not more confusing!
BA
Barbra 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gail
C) forwarding the packet unchanged
ST
Staci 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gail
B) penultimate hop popping by a downstream router
AN
Annett 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gail
A) swapping with a new label
VA
Vashti 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be D) penultimate hop popping by an upstream router instead.
DA
Daron 2 years ago
I agree with Alyce, because the implicit null label is used to signal the penultimate hop to pop the label.
CE
Celestina 2 years ago
D has to be the answer. Penultimate hop popping by an upstream router is the expected behavior, right?
KA
Katheryn 2 years ago
↳ replying to Celestina
That's correct, the LDP implicit null label causes penultimate hop popping by an upstream router.
GO
Goldie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Celestina
I agree, it causes penultimate hop popping by an upstream router.
VI
Virgie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Celestina
Yes, penultimate hop popping by an upstream router is the expected behavior.
TH
Theola 2 years ago
↳ replying to Celestina
I think you're right, D is the answer.
MA
Maryln 2 years ago
I think C is the correct answer. Forwarding the packet unchanged seems like the logical choice for an LDP implicit null label.
ES
Essie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Maryln
Yes, that's correct. The LDP implicit null label causes the packet to be forwarded unchanged.
JA
Javier 2 years ago
↳ replying to Maryln
I agree, forwarding the packet unchanged makes sense.
TE
Teddy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Maryln
I think C is the correct answer.
SH
Shaun 2 years ago
Option B makes sense to me. The penultimate hop popping by a downstream router seems like the right behavior for an LDP implicit null label.
MI
Mindy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shaun
No, it actually causes penultimate hop popping by a downstream router.
DI
Dick 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shaun
So, the packet is forwarded unchanged?
HI
Hildred 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shaun
Yes, that's correct. It is the behavior for an LDP implicit null label.
TA
Tayna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shaun
I think it causes penultimate hop popping by a downstream router.
AL
Alyce 2 years ago
I think the answer is B) penultimate hop popping by a downstream router.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel