Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

EC-Council ECSS Exam - Topic 7 Question 123 Discussion

Posted by Julian on Jul 01, 2026 at 02:52 AM

Robert, a security specialist, was appointed to strengthen the security of the organization's network. To prevent multiple login attempts from unknown sources, Robert implemented a security strategy of issuing alerts or warning messages when multiple failed login attempts are made.

Which of the following security risks is addressed by Robert to make attempted break-ins unsuccessful?

Suggested Answer: B

Robert's strategy of issuing alerts or warning messages when multiple failed login attempts occur is aimed at addressing the risk ofabsence of account lockout for invalid session IDs.By locking out accounts temporarily after a certain number of failed login attempts, Robert prevents attackers from repeatedly guessing passwords or trying different session IDs to gain unauthorized access.Reference: EC-Council Certified Security Specialist (E|CSS) documents and study guide12.


Get Premium ECSS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
CO
Coletta 2 days ago
But Robert's strategy directly targets failed logins, so B makes sense.
IN
India 8 days ago
I feel like D could also be a concern. Weak IDs are risky.
MA
Marla 13 days ago
Agreed! Multiple failed attempts should trigger a lockout.
MI
Mila 18 days ago
I think it's B. Account lockout is crucial.
PA
Pamella 23 days ago
I see the point, but D is still a big risk.
SH
Sherly 28 days ago
Definitely B. Alerts are not enough without lockout.
MA
Maryanne 1 month ago
I vote for B too. Lockout prevents brute force attacks.
AD
Adelina 1 month ago
True, but weak IDs can lead to easier breaches.
NO
Nohemi 1 month ago
But B directly addresses the login attempts issue.
AR
Arthur 2 months ago
I feel like D is also a concern. Weak IDs can be exploited.
TH
Thurman 2 months ago
Agreed! Multiple attempts should trigger a lockout.
SE
Selene 2 months ago
I think it's B. Account lockout is crucial.
DO
Dorethea 2 months ago
Agreed, but I wonder if it covers all possible threats.
DI
Dion 2 months ago
Definitely a good strategy, but what about session timeouts?
AJ
Aja 2 months ago
Wait, are alerts really enough? Seems a bit basic.
JA
Jamie 3 months ago
I think this mainly addresses option B.
KE
Kenny 3 months ago
Sounds like a solid move to prevent brute force attacks!
TH
Theresia 3 months ago
I believe Robert's strategy is addressing the absence of account lockout, which is crucial for preventing brute-force attacks.
TR
Tricia 3 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the options. I thought weak session-ID generation was more about how IDs are created, not failed logins.
IN
In 3 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced on session management risks. I think it might relate to account lockout.
SY
Sylvie 4 months ago
I remember studying about account lockout mechanisms, but I'm not sure if that's the main focus here.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel