MENU
A customer of a bank has placed a dispute on a payment for a credit card account. The banking system uses digital signatures to safeguard the integrity of their transactions. The bank claims that the system shows proof that the customer in fact made the payment. What is this system capability commonly known as?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 712-50 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
XE
Xenia
11 months ago
Digital rights management? That's a stretch!
LA
Lashawna
11 months ago
Strong authentication could also fit, but I lean towards non-repudiation.
SU
Susana
12 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds too simple.
DU
Dustin
12 months ago
I agree, non-repudiation is the right term here.
EL
Elvera
1 year ago
It's definitely non-repudiation!
VI
Viola
1 year ago
I keep mixing up these terms, but I think conflict resolution is more about disputes rather than proving who made a transaction.
IZ
Izetta
1 year ago
This sounds similar to a practice question I did on transaction integrity. I believe non-repudiation is the right term here.
NO
Novella
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember practicing a question about digital signatures and their role in authentication.
RO
Roslyn
1 year ago
I think the answer might be non-repudiation since it relates to proving that a transaction was made by the customer.
SE
Selma
1 year ago
Okay, the question is asking about the "powerful service integrations" that HyperFlex has with the Cisco portfolio. I think I can eliminate a few options based on my understanding, but I'll need to double-check the specifics.
LI
Lino
1 year ago
I might be mistaken, but isn't it true that iOS needs its own app icon configurations?
FA
Fatima
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about when to use an alternating treatments design. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.
GE
Gerardo
1 year ago
I think this statement is true since using the same XML schemas usually means data can be exchanged seamlessly.
CA
Carolann
1 year ago
If I had a nickel for every time a bank tried to pull the 'digital signature' trick, I'd be richer than the CEO.
EL
Ellsworth
1 year ago
Digital rights management? Really? I thought this was a banking exam, not a Hollywood movie screening.
LU
Lura
1 year ago
Digital signatures, eh? I bet the bank's IT guys are high-fiving themselves right about now. 'Take that, fraudsters!'
MA
Marti
1 year ago
You're right, it's A) non-repudiation.
BR
Brandon
1 year ago
A) non-repudiation
LU
Lucy
1 year ago
No, I believe it's C) strong authentication.
AL
Alana
1 year ago
C) strong authentication
AD
Adell
1 year ago
I think it's A) non-repudiation.
AJ
Aja
1 year ago
A) non-repudiation
RE
Renay
1 year ago
Non-repudiation, huh? Sounds like the bank's way of saying 'we've got you on camera, buddy!'
SH
Shizue
1 year ago
The bank is basically saying they have proof that you made the payment.
BU
Buck
1 year ago
Non-repudiation is a feature that ensures the integrity of transactions.
AL
Alline
1 year ago
C) strong authentication
DU
Dustin
1 year ago
A) non-repudiation
EM
Emily
1 year ago
Ah, the old non-repudiation question. This one's a classic! Time to put my cryptography knowledge to the test.
CI
Ciara
1 year ago
Actually, I believe it's C) strong authentication. It verifies the identity of the customer before any transaction.
ED
Edelmira
1 year ago
C) strong authentication
ED
Edelmira
1 year ago
I think it's A) non-repudiation. It ensures that the customer cannot deny making the payment.
DE
Derrick
1 year ago
A) non-repudiation
DA
Dacia
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think non-repudiation is the ability to prove that a transaction was done by a specific party.
RE
Rebeca
2 years ago
I agree with Billi, non-repudiation makes sense in this scenario.
BI
Billi
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) non-repudiation.