Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil 312-96 Exam - Topic 9 Question 26 Discussion

Identify what should NOT be catched while handling exceptions.A EOFException
B) SecurityException
C) IllegalAccessException
D) NullPointerException

Eccouncil 312-96 Exam - Topic 9 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-96 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 9
[All 312-96 Questions]

Identify what should NOT be catched while handling exceptions.

A EOFException

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Carey at Sep 15, 2024, 01:17 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-96 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Taryn
9 months ago
Really? I didn't know catching EOFException was a bad practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
9 months ago
I thought IllegalAccessException was a common one to catch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
10 months ago
Wait, why not catch SecurityException? Seems important!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
10 months ago
Agreed, EOFException is usually not a good idea either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
10 months ago
Definitely shouldn't catch NullPointerException.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
10 months ago
I recall that catching IllegalAccessException can sometimes mask issues in the code, but I can't remember if that's the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we discussed catching exceptions, and I feel like SecurityException might be one we should avoid too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about EOFException being related to input/output operations, so maybe that's not the one to catch?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
11 months ago
I think we shouldn't catch a NullPointerException because it usually indicates a bug in the code that needs fixing, not just handling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer here. NullPointerException and EOFException are both exceptions that should be handled, not caught, so the correct answer is B. SecurityException.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. We shouldn't catch SecurityException or IllegalAccessException, as those are more specific exceptions that should be handled separately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we shouldn't catch general exceptions like NullPointerException, but I'm not sure about the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky exception handling question. I'll need to think carefully about which exceptions should not be caught.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harley
2 years ago
I disagree, I think SecurityException should not be caught as it may compromise system security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
2 years ago
Definitely not A. EOFException. That's a common one you'd want to handle in file-reading code.
upvoted 0 times
Tom
2 years ago
D) NullPointerException
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
2 years ago
C) IllegalAccessException
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
2 years ago
B) SecurityException
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Judy
2 years ago
I agree with Jules, EOFException should not be caught because it indicates end of file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
2 years ago
Hmm, my gut says B. SecurityException. That's a checked exception, so you should let the caller handle it.
upvoted 0 times
Billy
2 years ago
No, NullPointerException should not be caught either. It's a runtime exception.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
2 years ago
What about NullPointerException? Should that be caught?
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
2 years ago
Yes, SecurityException is a checked exception, so it should be handled by the caller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
2 years ago
I think you're right. SecurityException should not be caught.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jules
2 years ago
I think EOFException should not be catched.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
2 years ago
C'mon, everyone knows you should never try to catch NullPointerException. That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
2 years ago
I think the answer should be D. NullPointerException. That's a runtime exception, not something you should catch explicitly.
upvoted 0 times
Chauncey
2 years ago
Yes, catching NullPointerException can hide bugs in your code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
2 years ago
I agree, NullPointerException should not be caught explicitly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel