New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil 312-96 Exam - Topic 3 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-96 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 3
[All 312-96 Questions]

Which of the following method will you use in place of ex.printStackTrace() method to avoid printing stack trace on error?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Vivienne at Nov 25, 2025, 11:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-96 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Milly
18 hours ago
Totally agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
6 days ago
I'm just glad they didn't include "ex.printStacktrace(false);" as an option. That would have been too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
11 days ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers tried to trick us with those other options. C) is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
16 days ago
D) ex.getError(); sounds like it should work, but I guess C) is the real deal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
21 days ago
I always forget which one to use. C) ex.getMessage(); sounds like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
27 days ago
C) ex.getMessage(); is the correct answer. It's a simple and effective way to get the error message without the stack trace.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
1 month ago
I definitely remember that ex.printStackTrace() is not what we want, but I can't remember if ex.getError() is a real method or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
1 month ago
I'm a bit confused; I feel like ex.message() sounds familiar, but I can't recall if that's a valid method in Java.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
1 month ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think ex.getMessage() is the right choice since it returns a string without printing the stack trace.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
2 months ago
Easy peasy! The answer is clearly C. ex.getMessage() is the way to go if you want to get the error message without all the clutter of the stack trace. Gotta love those concise error handling methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
2 months ago
I'm a little confused by this one. I know ex.printStackTrace() prints the full stack trace, but I'm not sure which of these options is the best replacement. I'll have to review my notes and think it through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
2 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking for a method to avoid printing the stack trace, so I'm going to go with option C. ex.getMessage() should give me the error message without all the extra stack trace details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
2 months ago
I think the method we're looking for is related to getting the error message, but I'm not sure if it's getMessage or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
2 months ago
I think C) ex.getMessage() is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
2 months ago
I think it's C) ex.getMessage();
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
3 months ago
Just to clarify, ex.message() isn't a thing, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. I know ex.printStackTrace() prints the full stack trace, but I'm not 100% sure which method is the right replacement. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
3 months ago
I think I'll go with option C. ex.getMessage() seems like the best way to get the error message without the full stack trace.
upvoted 0 times
Bea
3 months ago
Definitely! It gives just the message we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel