New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil 312-39 Exam - Topic 3 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-39 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 3
[All 312-39 Questions]

Which of the following data source will a SOC Analyst use to monitor connections to the insecure ports?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Tien at Jun 24, 2024, 06:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-39 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Wilbert
3 months ago
Not sure if Netstat is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
3 months ago
I’m surprised DHCP Data isn’t mentioned more often.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
3 months ago
No way, it's all about IIS Data!
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
4 months ago
I think DNS Data could also be relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
4 months ago
Definitely Netstat Data for monitoring connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
4 months ago
DHCP Data seems off for this question; I don’t think it directly monitors connections like the others do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards IIS Data because it deals with web server connections, but I can't recall if it specifically covers insecure ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to identify data sources for network monitoring. I feel like DNS Data might not be relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
5 months ago
I think Netstat Data is the right choice since it shows active connections and listening ports, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Netstat Data is the answer here. As a SOC analyst, I'll be using that to track network connections and identify any that are going to insecure ports. I feel confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know we need to monitor for connections to insecure ports, but I'm not sure if Netstat is the best data source for that. Maybe the DNS or DHCP data would give me more relevant information? I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know Netstat can show network connections, but I'm not sure if that's the best data source for monitoring insecure ports specifically. Maybe I should review my notes on SOC analyst responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
5 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm going to go with Netstat Data since that would give me the connection information I need to monitor insecure ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
5 months ago
Netstat Data is definitely the way to go here. As a SOC analyst, that's going to be your go-to source for monitoring network activity and identifying any suspicious connections to insecure ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about security awareness programs. I think the key is to focus on evaluating the effectiveness of the program, especially for senior executives. Controlled spear phishing campaigns seem like the best way to test their awareness and response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to review the Audit Logs configuration options to determine what the administrator is unable to configure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
5 months ago
Honestly, I have no idea what the difference between these versions is when it comes to TCP. I might guess NFSv4 since it's the latest?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm thinking Netstat is the way to go here. It just makes the most sense in terms of monitoring connections to insecure ports. DNS and DHCP data don't really seem relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
2 years ago
I think IIS Data could also be useful in monitoring connections to insecure ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
2 years ago
Haha, IIS data? What is this, a joke? That's like trying to use a fork to eat soup. Netstat is the only way to go, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
2 years ago
DHCP data? Really? That's like trying to find a needle in a haystack. Netstat is the way to go, hands down.
upvoted 0 times
Jin
2 years ago
I agree, trying to find that information in DHCP data would be like looking for a needle in a haystack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
2 years ago
Netstat Data is definitely the best option for monitoring connections to insecure ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lovetta
2 years ago
I'm torn between Netstat and DHCP data. Hmm, this is a tough one.
upvoted 0 times
Rhea
2 years ago
I would go with Netstat Data for monitoring connections to insecure ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
2 years ago
B) DNS Data wouldn't be as helpful in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
2 years ago
I think DHCP Data could also be useful in monitoring connections to insecure ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
2 years ago
A) Netstat Data would be the best option to monitor connections to insecure ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherry
2 years ago
I would also consider DNS Data, as it can provide information on network connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
2 years ago
Netstat data seems like the obvious choice here. I can't believe anyone would even consider IIS data for monitoring connections to insecure ports.
upvoted 0 times
Tish
2 years ago
Yeah, I don't see how IIS data would be helpful in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
2 years ago
I agree, netstat data is the way to go for monitoring insecure ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gary
2 years ago
I agree with Daren, Netstat Data can help monitor connections to insecure ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
2 years ago
I think a SOC Analyst would use Netstat Data.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel