New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil 212-89 Exam - Topic 2 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-89 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 2
[All 212-89 Questions]

Eric works as a system administrator in ABC organization. He granted privileged users with unlimited permissions to access the systems. These privileged users can misuse

their rights unintentionally or maliciously or attackers can trick them to perform malicious activities.

Which of the following guidelines helps incident handlers to eradicate insider attacks by privileged users?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Ezekiel at Jul 09, 2023, 09:33 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 212-89 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Timothy
3 months ago
C is the way to go for sure, accountability is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
3 months ago
Wait, are we really not using encryption? That sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
4 months ago
A and B are just bad ideas, no way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
4 months ago
I disagree, D seems more relevant to accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
4 months ago
Definitely C! Default accounts are a huge risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
4 months ago
I recall that enabling default accounts can lead to security issues, so I would lean towards option C as a guideline to prevent insider threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
I think we practiced a question about restricting access for admins, which might relate to option B. But that seems risky too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like allowing unique accounts is crucial for tracking actions. Maybe option D is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of accountability for privileged users, so I think option C makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
5 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. The options seem to cover different aspects of portfolio management, but I'm not totally clear on how they relate to the specific concept of Guardrails. I'll have to review my notes to see if I can narrow it down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'll need to carefully review the different Windows versions and their upgrade paths to Windows 10 Enterprise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Let me re-read the question and the choices to make sure I understand what's being asked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
5 months ago
I don't know if just extending the WS-Policy assertion is enough to handle false complaints. It seems like there should be more security measures involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
10 months ago
I bet the right answer is 'All of the above' - just to see who's paying attention!
upvoted 0 times
Annalee
9 months ago
User 3: Yeah, it's important to have accountability in place for privileged users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
9 months ago
User 2: I agree, that sounds like a good guideline to prevent insider attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
9 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is C) Do not enable the default administrative accounts to ensure accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Olene
10 months ago
Option D, really? Not letting admins use unique accounts during installation? That's like saying 'Hey, please hack us!' Definitely going with C on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Albert
8 months ago
User4: User1: Option D seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
8 months ago
User3: I agree, C sounds like the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
8 months ago
User2: User Comment: Option D, really? Not letting admins use unique accounts during installation? That's like saying 'Hey, please hack us!' Definitely going with C on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
8 months ago
User1: Option D seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
9 months ago
User 4: I'm with the majority here, C is definitely the way to go to eradicate insider attacks by privileged users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
9 months ago
User 3: Geraldine and Stephanie make good points. C seems like the safest choice to prevent insider attacks by privileged users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
10 months ago
User 2: Geraldine is right, Option D sounds risky. I agree with C, enabling default administrative accounts for accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
10 months ago
User 1: Option D, really? Not letting admins use unique accounts during installation? That's like saying 'Hey, please hack us!'
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tresa
10 months ago
Haha, are they serious? Option A about not using encryption on backup tapes? That's like leaving the keys in the car and hoping no one steals it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
10 months ago
I disagree. I think the answer is A) Do not use encryption methods to prevent administrators and privileged users from accessing backup tapes and sensitive information. It's important to restrict access to sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
10 months ago
I agree with Grover. Having default administrative accounts enabled can lead to insider attacks. It's important to have accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
10 months ago
I think the answer is C) Do not enable the default administrative accounts to ensure accountability. It makes sense to have unique accounts for administrators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
11 months ago
Whoa, this is a tough one. I'm going with option B - not controlling access for admins? That's just begging for a security breach!
upvoted 0 times
Jamie
10 months ago
User2: Agreed, giving unlimited permissions without any control is a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
10 months ago
User1: I think option B is a bad idea too. Admins should definitely have controlled access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecil
11 months ago
Option C is clearly the correct answer. Disabling default admin accounts is crucial for accountability. Letting privileged users have unlimited access is just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
Janey
10 months ago
That's a good point. It's always better to have separate accounts for different levels of access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
10 months ago
I think option D could also be helpful. Using unique accounts for administrators adds an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
10 months ago
Absolutely, accountability is key when it comes to privileged users. It's important to limit their access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
10 months ago
I agree, option C is definitely the best choice. Default admin accounts should always be disabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherell
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D could also be a good choice. Using unique accounts for administrators during installation can help track their activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
11 months ago
I agree with Deeanna. It's important to have accountability in place to prevent insider attacks by privileged users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
11 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. Enabling default administrative accounts can help ensure accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel