Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil 212-82 Exam - Topic 9 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-82 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 9
[All 212-82 Questions]

Perform vulnerability assessment of an Android device located at IP address 172.30.20.110. Identify the severity score for the device. You can use the OpenVAS vulnerability scanner, available with Parrot Security, with credentials admln/password for this challenge. (Practical Question)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Keneth at Jul 25, 2023, 06:39 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 212-82 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Brice
6 months ago
I thought it would be higher, honestly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
6 months ago
I got 2.2, but I'm not sure if that's right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
7 months ago
Wait, isn't 2.6 a bit low for an Android device?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
7 months ago
Definitely 2.4, that's what I got too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
7 months ago
I think the severity score is 2.8.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards 2.8, but I’m a bit uncertain about how the scoring works in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
7 months ago
I feel like 2.4 could be a safe bet, but I can't recall the exact details from my studies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
8 months ago
I think the last practice question had a similar setup, and I chose a score around 2.6. Maybe that's the right one here too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
8 months ago
I remember practicing with OpenVAS, but I'm not sure how to interpret the severity scores correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
8 months ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between MTTR and MTRS and how AI could impact those metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
8 months ago
Ah, I see. The 'Break' activity is designed specifically for this purpose, to exit a For Each loop efficiently. That makes sense. I feel pretty confident about selecting B as the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with this type of network setup, I'll need to think through it step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
8 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I think the key is to identify the solution that can selectively apply additional verification for the federated third-party app, while exempting Outlook.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
8 months ago
Multipoint GRE tunnel interface? I don't think that's correct for a FlexVPN setup. I'm going to go with IKEv2 profile as my final answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
1 year ago
Wait, did they really spell 'admin' wrong? I bet the password is 'password' too. This is gonna be too easy.
upvoted 0 times
Fernanda
11 months ago
User 3: This is going to be a piece of cake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
11 months ago
User 2: I know, and the password is probably 'password'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
12 months ago
User 1: Yeah, they misspelled 'admin' as 'admln'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vince
1 year ago
2.8, huh? Looks like this device has some serious vulnerabilities. Hope it's not storing any sensitive data!
upvoted 0 times
Corrinne
12 months ago
User 3: We should make sure to address those issues as soon as possible to protect any sensitive data on the device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that's a pretty high severity score. Definitely some serious vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
1 year ago
User 1: I think it's option B) 2.8
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daniel
1 year ago
Hmm, 'admln' as the username? Guess they're not too concerned about security, huh?
upvoted 0 times
Teddy
11 months ago
User 4: Hopefully we can identify and address any security issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlee
11 months ago
User 3: I agree, let's run the vulnerability assessment with that score.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
11 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that seems like a reasonable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
11 months ago
User 1: Let's go with option D) 2.4 for the severity score.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
12 months ago
User 3: I agree, let's stick with option D) 2.4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
12 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that seems like a reasonable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
12 months ago
User 4: Sounds good to me, let's proceed with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, let's stick with option D) 2.4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
1 year ago
User 1: Let's go with option D) 2.4 for the severity score.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that seems like a reasonable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
1 year ago
User 1: Let's go with option D) 2.4 for the severity score.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stanton
1 year ago
I'm going with 2.4, based on the potential risks associated with the device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
1 year ago
I believe it's 2.8 because the vulnerabilities seem quite serious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marisha
1 year ago
I think the severity score is 2.2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
1 year ago
Alright, time to give this a shot! Let's see what the OpenVAS scanner can dig up on that Android device.
upvoted 0 times
Blondell
1 year ago
I got 2.4 as the severity score.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
1 year ago
I think the severity score is 2.2.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerrod
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards 2.4 because of the potential risks identified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
1 year ago
I believe it could be 2.8 based on the vulnerabilities found.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
1 year ago
I think the severity score might be 2.2.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel