Eccouncil 212-82 Exam - Topic 9 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-82 exam

Question #: 18
Topic #: 9

Perform vulnerability assessment of an Android device located at IP address 172.30.20.110. Identify the severity score for the device. You can use the OpenVAS vulnerability scanner, available with Parrot Security, with credentials admln/password for this challenge. (Practical Question)

A2.2

B2.8

C02.6

D2.4

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Keneth at Jul 25, 2023, 06:39 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 212-82 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Brice

9 months ago

I thought it would be higher, honestly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Santos

10 months ago

I got 2.2, but I'm not sure if that's right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hildred

10 months ago

Wait, isn't 2.6 a bit low for an Android device?

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandee

10 months ago

Definitely 2.4, that's what I got too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

10 months ago

I think the severity score is 2.8.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

11 months ago

I’m leaning towards 2.8, but I’m a bit uncertain about how the scoring works in this context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brock

11 months ago

I feel like 2.4 could be a safe bet, but I can't recall the exact details from my studies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noah

11 months ago

I think the last practice question had a similar setup, and I chose a score around 2.6. Maybe that's the right one here too?

upvoted 0 times

...

Annamae

11 months ago

I remember practicing with OpenVAS, but I'm not sure how to interpret the severity scores correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paul

11 months ago

Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between MTTR and MTRS and how AI could impact those metrics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marti

11 months ago

Ah, I see. The 'Break' activity is designed specifically for this purpose, to exit a For Each loop efficiently. That makes sense. I feel pretty confident about selecting B as the answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casie

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not too familiar with this type of network setup, I'll need to think through it step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kate

11 months ago

This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I think the key is to identify the solution that can selectively apply additional verification for the federated third-party app, while exempting Outlook.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

11 months ago

Multipoint GRE tunnel interface? I don't think that's correct for a FlexVPN setup. I'm going to go with IKEv2 profile as my final answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marti

1 year ago

Wait, did they really spell 'admin' wrong? I bet the password is 'password' too. This is gonna be too easy.

upvoted 0 times

Fernanda

1 year ago

User 3: This is going to be a piece of cake.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mireya

1 year ago

User 2: I know, and the password is probably 'password'.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

1 year ago

User 1: Yeah, they misspelled 'admin' as 'admln'.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vince

1 year ago

2.8, huh? Looks like this device has some serious vulnerabilities. Hope it's not storing any sensitive data!

upvoted 0 times

Corrinne

1 year ago

User 3: We should make sure to address those issues as soon as possible to protect any sensitive data on the device.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylou

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, that's a pretty high severity score. Definitely some serious vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Renay

1 year ago

User 1: I think it's option B) 2.8

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniel

1 year ago

Hmm, 'admln' as the username? Guess they're not too concerned about security, huh?

upvoted 0 times

Teddy

1 year ago

User 4: Hopefully we can identify and address any security issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlee

1 year ago

User 3: I agree, let's run the vulnerability assessment with that score.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shay

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, that seems like a reasonable choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariko

1 year ago

User 1: Let's go with option D) 2.4 for the severity score.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

1 year ago

User 3: I agree, let's stick with option D) 2.4.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tony

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, that seems like a reasonable choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Enola

1 year ago

User 4: Sounds good to me, let's proceed with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Venita

1 year ago

User 3: I agree, let's stick with option D) 2.4.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chun

1 year ago

User 1: Let's go with option D) 2.4 for the severity score.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brynn

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, that seems like a reasonable choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

1 year ago

User 1: Let's go with option D) 2.4 for the severity score.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stanton

1 year ago

I'm going with 2.4, based on the potential risks associated with the device.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynsey

1 year ago

I believe it's 2.8 because the vulnerabilities seem quite serious.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marisha

1 year ago

I think the severity score is 2.2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yvonne

1 year ago

Alright, time to give this a shot! Let's see what the OpenVAS scanner can dig up on that Android device.

upvoted 0 times

Blondell

1 year ago

I got 2.4 as the severity score.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

1 year ago

I think the severity score is 2.2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerrod

1 year ago

I'm leaning towards 2.4 because of the potential risks identified.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teddy

1 year ago

I believe it could be 2.8 based on the vulnerabilities found.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julio

1 year ago

I think the severity score might be 2.2.

upvoted 0 times

...