Eccouncil 212-82 Exam - Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-82 exam

Question #: 50
Topic #: 1

Hotel Grande offers luxury accommodations and emphasizes top-notch service for its guests. One such service is secure, high-speed Wi-FI access In every room. The hotel wishes to deploy an authentication method that would give individual guests a seamless experience without compromising security. This method should ideally provide a balance between convenience and strong security. Which of the following should Hotel Grande use?

APSK (Pre-Shared Key)

BOpen Authentication

CEAP-TLS (Extensible Authentication Protocol-Transport Layer Security)

DMAC address filtering

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Strong Security:

EAP-TLS provides strong security by using certificate-based authentication. This ensures that both the client and server are authenticated before a connection is established.

Seamless User Experience:

Once the certificates are installed, the authentication process is seamless for the user, providing a balance between strong security and convenience.

Mitigating Risks:

EAP-TLS mitigates risks associated with weaker authentication methods, such as Pre-Shared Keys (PSKs), which can be shared or stolen.

Deployment and Management:

Although initial deployment and certificate management require effort, the long-term security benefits and user convenience outweigh the initial setup challenges.

Given the need for a balance between security and convenience, EAP-TLS is the best authentication method for Hotel Grande's Wi-Fi access.

by Danica at Mar 20, 2025, 08:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 212-82 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Erick

5 months ago

Really? MAC address filtering? Seems outdated to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ceola

5 months ago

PSK is too easy to crack, not a good choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

6 months ago

EAP-TLS is the way to go for strong security!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lelia

6 months ago

I’m surprised they’re even considering anything other than EAP-TLS!

upvoted 0 times

...

Monte

6 months ago

Open Authentication? No way, that’s super risky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rhea

6 months ago

MAC address filtering could work, but I recall it can be a hassle to manage and isn't foolproof against spoofing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tula

6 months ago

Open Authentication seems really convenient, but I feel like it compromises security too much for a luxury hotel.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nilsa

7 months ago

I think PSK could be easier for guests to use, but it might not be the most secure option if too many people have access to the key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamal

7 months ago

I remember studying about EAP-TLS and how it provides strong security with certificates, but I'm not sure if it's too complex for a hotel setting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicia

7 months ago

I think the key here is finding the right balance between security and convenience for the hotel's guests. EAP-TLS seems like the best option, as it provides strong security while still maintaining a seamless experience for users.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosann

7 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the options here. MAC address filtering seems like it could work, but I'm not sure if that's the most convenient option for guests. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annett

7 months ago

Okay, let's think this through. The hotel wants a seamless experience for guests, so open authentication is probably not the best choice since it doesn't require any authentication. PSK could work, but it might be less secure than other options. I'm leaning towards EAP-TLS, as that seems to provide a good balance of convenience and security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Owen

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I know the hotel wants a balance of convenience and security, but I'm not sure which option best fits that criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glennis

8 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about authentication methods for hotel Wi-Fi. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Miss

1 year ago

I think Open Authentication might be more convenient for guests, but it's not as secure as EAP-TLS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorinda

1 year ago

Ah, the age-old dilemma of convenience vs. security. I bet Hotel Grande's guests are hoping for a magic trick that solves it all. EAP-TLS is the way to go, folks!

upvoted 0 times

Salome

1 year ago

User 2: I agree, it provides a good balance between convenience and security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raylene

1 year ago

User 1: EAP-TLS is definitely the best option for Hotel Grande.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barbra

1 year ago

I'm feeling a bit sleepy after reading this question. Maybe I should book a room at Hotel Grande and test out their fancy Wi-Fi authentication system firsthand.

upvoted 0 times

Corrina

1 year ago

D) MAC address filtering

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozelle

1 year ago

C) EAP-TLS (Extensible Authentication Protocol-Transport Layer Security)

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilford

1 year ago

A) PSK (Pre-Shared Key)

upvoted 0 times

...

Arthur

1 year ago

I'm not sure, I think MAC address filtering could also be a good option for security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clay

1 year ago

D) MAC address filtering? Really? That's so last decade. Hotel Grande needs to step up their game and go with the modern solution, EAP-TLS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eva

1 year ago

I agree with Izetta, EAP-TLS provides a good balance between convenience and security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

1 year ago

C'mon, the answer is clearly C. EAP-TLS provides a great balance between convenience and security. Hotel Grande would be foolish to go with anything else.

upvoted 0 times