Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

EC-Council 212-81 Exam - Topic 11 Question 31 Discussion

Posted by Alpha on May 02, 2024 at 03:38 PM

Collision resistance is an important property for any hashing algorithm. Joan wants to find a cryptographic hash that has strong collision resistance. Which one of the following is the most collisionresistant?

Suggested Answer: D

Integrity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_hash_function#Verifying_the_integrity_of_messages_and_files

An important application of secure hashes is verification of message integrity. Comparing message digests (hash digests over the message) calculated before, and after, transmission can determine whether any changes have been made to the message or file.


Get Premium 212-81 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
HU
Huey 11 months ago
SHA2 is the way to go for strong security!
GE
Gennie 11 months ago
I thought MD5 was still okay for some uses?
TR
Trina 11 months ago
Wait, is PIKE even a real hashing algorithm?
CE
Celeste 12 months ago
Agreed, MD5 and MD4 are outdated and weak.
LO
Lorita 12 months ago
SHA2 is definitely the most collision-resistant option here.
FL
Fletcher 1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about PIKE; I don’t recall studying it much compared to SHA2, which I know is solid.
JU
Justine 1 year ago
I feel like we had a practice question about hashing algorithms, and SHA2 was definitely highlighted as the stronger choice.
SV
Svetlana 1 year ago
I remember that MD5 and MD4 are considered weak in terms of collision resistance, so I would lean towards SHA2.
WI
William 1 year ago
I think SHA2 is the most collision-resistant option here, but I’m not entirely sure if PIKE is newer and better.
DA
Dallas 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I know MD4 and MD5 are considered weak, but I'm not sure how PIKE compares to SHA2 in terms of collision resistance. I'll have to think this through carefully.
AS
Ashleigh 1 year ago
Based on what I've learned, SHA2 is generally considered the most secure and collision-resistant hash function of the choices provided. I'll go with that.
HA
Hana 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I know MD5 has known collision vulnerabilities, but I'm not as familiar with the collision resistance properties of the other options.
CH
Chauncey 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that SHA2 is the most collision-resistant option here. It's a widely used and well-studied cryptographic hash function.
TE
Teddy 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The options don't seem to directly match the description of the network port. I'll have to think this through step-by-step.
SH
Shaunna 1 year ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different themes and how they relate to communicating with stakeholders.
PE
Pearly 1 year ago
MD4? Isn't that like the little brother of MD5 - always trying to live up to the bigger, stronger sibling? SHA2 is the clear winner here.
FE
Felix 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pearly
I agree, SHA2 is the best choice for strong collision resistance.
GA
Gaston 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pearly
MD4 doesn't stand a chance against SHA2 in terms of collision resistance.
DE
Desiree 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pearly
SHA2 is definitely the most collision-resistant option.
JE
Jessenia 1 year ago
PIKE? Is that some kind of new fishing lure? I'll stick with the tried and true SHA2, thanks.
TO
Tonette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jessenia
MD5 and MD4 are known to have vulnerabilities, so SHA2 is the safest choice.
TO
Torie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jessenia
Yeah, PIKE is not a hashing algorithm, it's probably a fishing term.
WE
Weldon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jessenia
I agree, SHA2 is definitely the most collision-resistant option.
NA
Nadine 2 years ago
MD5? Seriously? That's like using a cardboard shield against a cannon. SHA2 is the way to go if you want something truly collision-resistant.
TA
Tamala 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nadine
MD5 is definitely not a good option for collision resistance. SHA2 is much stronger.
TO
Tomas 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nadine
SHA2 is definitely the best choice for collision resistance.
JO
Joaquin 2 years ago
Collision resistance, huh? Sounds like a wrestling move I'd want to avoid in the ring! But for a hash function, gotta go with the big guns - SHA2 all the way!
RO
Rosio 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joaquin
Definitely, PIKE is not a common choice for cryptographic hashing.
DE
Desire 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joaquin
MD5 and MD4 are not as collision-resistant as SHA2.
KR
Kristel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joaquin
I agree, SHA2 is known for its security features.
AS
Ashton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joaquin
SHA2 is definitely the way to go for strong collision resistance.
JI
Jill 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think MD5 is also considered to have some collision resistance.
LA
Lashawn 2 years ago
I agree with Dahlia, SHA2 is known for its strong collision resistance.
DA
Dahlia 2 years ago
I think the most collision-resistant hash is SHA2.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel