MENU
Indian constitution does not expressly provide for the ''right to privacy'' to its citizens. However, there were various judicial pronouncements of the apex court which finally established the ''right to privacy'' as a fundamental right subsumed under Article 21 of the constitution of Indi
a. Article 21 inter alia provides and protects the __________________.
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium DCPP-01 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The APPI is applicable to all businesses handling personal information for business use; however, national government, local governments and incorporated administrative agencies are excluded from the scope. The APPI is applicable to businesses in or outside Japan that collect personal information of Japanese citizens.
36 comments · newest first
JE
Jerrod
10 months ago
I disagree, I think it should be more explicitly stated in the constitution.
YV
Yvette
11 months ago
Article 21 has been around for ages, surprised people don’t know this!
LI
Lindsey
11 months ago
Wait, I thought privacy was just a recent thing?
PU
Pura
11 months ago
Totally agree, it's a fundamental right!
MO
Moon
11 months ago
Right to Life and Personal liberty is Article 21!
SH
Shasta
12 months ago
I keep mixing up the rights under Article 21 and other articles. Is it really just about life and personal liberty?
CH
Cheryl
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I think the answer is definitely the right to life and personal liberty.
PE
Penney
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the right to privacy is linked to personal liberty somehow.
BR
Brunilda
1 year ago
I remember discussing Article 21 in class, and I think it was about the right to life and personal liberty.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
I think the key here is understanding how the "right to privacy" was established under Article 21. Since that's the context provided, the answer is most likely going to be related to that, even if it's not a direct match to the options. I'll have to think this through carefully.
IR
Irma
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The question is asking what Article 21 protects, and the "right to privacy" is mentioned, but that's not one of the options. I'll have to re-read the question and options closely to figure this out.
CO
Colette
1 year ago
Okay, I remember learning about this in class. The right to privacy was recognized as a fundamental right under Article 21, even though it's not explicitly mentioned in the constitution. So the answer has to be A, "right to life and personal liberty."
HE
Herman
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions the "right to privacy" being established under Article 21, so I'm not sure if the answer is as simple as just "right to life and personal liberty." I'll have to think this through carefully.
CO
Colene
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. Article 21 clearly protects the right to life and personal liberty, so I'll go with that.
RO
Royce
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The image shows a lot of fields, and I'm not sure which ones are relevant to the DNS hostnames. I'll need to read the question and answer choices closely to figure this out.
AR
Arlene
1 year ago
I think the answer is D. Using maximum-paths to install multiple paths in the routing table would allow the traffic to be load shared between the two routers, which is what the question is asking for.
AN
Annamaria
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the scaling rule and how it interacts with the initial instance count. Let me re-read this a few times.
WI
Winfred
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. There are a lot of different laws and regulations around data privacy, and I'm not sure which one is the best fit for this scenario. I'll have to think it through carefully.
AL
Alysa
1 year ago
I'm just hoping the exam doesn't include a question about the 'right to a good pun'. If it does, I might have to invoke Article 21 and demand a retrial.
ME
Merilyn
1 year ago
C) Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression
JA
Jaclyn
1 year ago
B) Right to Opportunity
DE
Desiree
1 year ago
A) Right to Life and Personal liberty
GE
Germaine
1 year ago
You know, if they really wanted to make this question challenging, they should have asked about the right to a free cup of tea. Now that would be a real brain-buster!
RY
Ryan
1 year ago
C) Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression
NO
Noelia
1 year ago
B) Right to Opportunity
MA
Maybelle
1 year ago
A) Right to Life and Personal liberty
AN
Annamae
1 year ago
Ah, the classic Article 21 question. It's like the swiss army knife of the Constitution - it can do anything! Gotta love how the courts have expanded its scope over the years.
ER
Erin
1 year ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I mean, the right to privacy is a fundamental right, so it has to be under Article 21, right? I'm not falling for any curveballs here.
GR
Gregg
1 year ago
D) Right to Equality before law
NA
Nadine
1 year ago
C) Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression
KR
Krystina
1 year ago
B) Right to Opportunity
KR
Krystal
1 year ago
A) Right to Life and Personal liberty
BR
Brande
1 year ago
Right to Life and Personal Liberty? Seems obvious, but I guess it's good to confirm. Can't go wrong with Article 21, that's the bread and butter of the Indian Constitution.
ST
Stanton
2 years ago
Exactly, the right to privacy is essential for ensuring autonomy and dignity.
GE
Georgene
2 years ago
I agree, Article 21 of the Indian constitution covers the right to life and personal liberty.
ST
Stanton
2 years ago
I think the right to privacy is crucial for protecting individual freedoms.