Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Databricks Certified Associate Developer for Apache Spark 3.5 Exam - Topic 4 Question 2 Discussion

Posted by Leonard on Nov 19, 2025 at 12:10 PM

3 of 55. A data engineer observes that the upstream streaming source feeds the event table frequently and sends duplicate records. Upon analyzing the current production table, the data engineer found that the time difference in the event_timestamp column of the duplicate records is, at most, 30 minutes.

To remove the duplicates, the engineer adds the code:

df = df.withWatermark("event_timestamp", "30 minutes")

What is the result?

Suggested Answer: C

In Structured Streaming, a watermark defines the maximum delay for event-time data to be considered in stateful operations like deduplication or window aggregations.

Behavior:

df = df.withWatermark('event_timestamp', '30 minutes')

This sets a 30-minute watermark, meaning Spark will only keep track of events that arrive within 30 minutes of the latest event time seen so far. When used with:

df.dropDuplicates(['event_id', 'event_timestamp'])

Spark removes duplicates that arrive within the watermark threshold (in this case, within 30 minutes).

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Watermarks do not remove all duplicates; they only manage those within the defined event-time window.

B: Watermark durations can be expressed as strings like '30 minutes', '10 seconds', etc., not only seconds.

D: Structured Streaming supports deduplication using withWatermark() and dropDuplicates().

Reference (Databricks Apache Spark 3.5 -- Python / Study Guide):

PySpark Structured Streaming Guide --- withWatermark() and dropDuplicates() methods for event-time deduplication.

Databricks Certified Associate Developer for Apache Spark Exam Guide (June 2025): Section ''Structured Streaming'' --- Topic: Streaming Deduplication with and without watermark usage.


Get Premium Databricks Certified Associate Developer for Apache Spark 3.5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
JO
Joesph 6 months ago
Definitely C. It’s about managing duplicates in that time frame.
JA
Jacob 6 months ago
D doesn’t fit either. The watermark should help with deduplication.
SY
Sylvie 7 months ago
B seems wrong. Watermarks can handle minutes, not just seconds.
RU
Ruthann 7 months ago
A is tempting, but it’s too broad. C is more accurate.
ST
Stevie 7 months ago
I agree with C too. Watermarks are meant for that.
TA
Tandra 8 months ago
I thought watermarks only help with late data, not deduplication.
TA
Tarra 8 months ago
Wait, does it really handle all duplicates?
LO
Lou 8 months ago
Totally agree, that's how watermarks work!
GA
Gayla 8 months ago
It removes duplicates within the 30-minute window.
NO
Noah 8 months ago
Haha, I bet the data engineer is regretting not using a unique identifier instead of relying on timestamps.
LA
Laine 8 months ago
D) I don't think the code can handle this scenario. Deduplication is tricky with streaming data.
SI
Sina 9 months ago
A) Removing all duplicates regardless of arrival time sounds too good to be true.
CH
Chandra 9 months ago
C) Seems like the right answer. The watermark will help remove duplicates within the 30-minute window.
SA
Sabra 9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about how watermarks work in practice. I thought they just marked late data, not necessarily removed duplicates. Maybe it's option D?
JO
Joanne 9 months ago
If I recall correctly, the watermark should help with deduplication within that 30-minute window, so I think option C makes sense.
ER
Ernie 9 months ago
I think the watermark only affects how late data is processed, so it might not remove all duplicates. I feel like I've seen a similar question where it specified a time window.
LA
Laine 9 months ago
I'm not too sure about this one. The question mentions that the engineer is trying to remove duplicates, but the watermark function is typically used for handling late-arriving records. I'm not convinced that C is the right answer, and I'm a bit worried that D might be the case here.
HA
Harrison 10 months ago
I remember something about watermarks being used to handle late data, but I'm not sure if it actually removes duplicates or just helps manage them.
PE
Penney 10 months ago
The key here is that the duplicate records have a time difference of at most 30 minutes in the event_timestamp column. So the watermark function should be able to handle this case and remove the duplicates that arrive within that window. I'm pretty confident C is the correct answer.
CH
Chantay 10 months ago
I think it’s C. It makes sense to deduplicate within the 30-minute window.
AG
Agustin 10 months ago
No way it removes all duplicates, that's not how it works!
HA
Harrison 10 months ago
C) The watermark should work to remove duplicates within the specified time window.
DA
Dalene 11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. I thought the watermark was used to handle out-of-order data, not necessarily duplicates. I'm not sure if this is the right approach for deduplication.
RO
Robt 11 months ago
I think the answer is C. The watermark function is used to handle late-arriving records, and the 30-minute window should remove duplicates that arrive within that time frame.
GR
Gracia 5 months ago
↳ replying to Robt
Exactly! It’s designed to handle those late records effectively.
TU
Tuyet 6 months ago
↳ replying to Robt
I think so too. It’s all about that 30-minute window.
LE
Leana 6 months ago
↳ replying to Robt
C is definitely the right choice!
MI
Mi 6 months ago
↳ replying to Robt
Yeah, the watermark will filter out those duplicates.
JA
Jacquelyne 6 months ago
↳ replying to Robt
I agree, C makes the most sense.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel