Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CyberArk SECRET-SEN Exam - Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.How can you confirm that the Follower has a current copy of the database?
B) Count the number of components in pgstartreplication and compare this to the total number of Followers in the deployment.
A) Compare the pgcurrentxlog_locationlocation from the Leader to the Follower you need to validate against.
C) Validate that the Follower container ID matches the node in the info endpoint on the Leader.
D) Retrieve the credential from a test application on the Leader cluster; then retrieve against the Follower and compare if they are accurate.

CyberArk SECRET-SEN Exam - Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's SECRET-SEN exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 1
[All SECRET-SEN Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

How can you confirm that the Follower has a current copy of the database?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Sherell at Mar 09, 2025, 11:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SECRET-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Eva
7 months ago
D sounds complicated, not sure if it's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
8 months ago
B is a good method too, but it might not be foolproof.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
8 months ago
Wait, can you really confirm it just by comparing IDs? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
8 months ago
I think C makes more sense, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
8 months ago
A is the way to go for checking the database sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
9 months ago
Option D seems a bit off to me; I don't think retrieving credentials is the right approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
9 months ago
I feel like counting components in pgstartreplication could be useful, but I can't recall if that directly confirms the database copy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
9 months ago
I remember practicing a question about validating container IDs, so option C might be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
9 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure how to compare the pgcurrentxlog_location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
9 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of database replication. I think the key is to find a way to directly compare the state of the database between the Leader and Follower. Comparing the pgcurrentxlog_location seems like the most reliable approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Validating the container ID against the Leader's info endpoint seems like it might not be the most reliable way to confirm the database copy. I'll need to double-check the other options to see what makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
9 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think comparing the pgcurrentxlog_location between the Leader and Follower is the most straightforward approach here. That should give me a clear indication of whether the Follower is up-to-date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
9 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the different ways to confirm the Follower has a current copy of the database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
9 months ago
This is a good one. I'm going to make sure I understand the relationship between the Leader and Follower, and then I'll systematically go through the options to find the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to compare the pgcurrentxlog_location between the Leader and the Follower. That should give me the confirmation I need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'll need to re-read the question and the exhibit to make sure I understand what I'm being asked to do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
9 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the best way to confirm the Follower has a current copy of the database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
1 year ago
Option A for the win! Comparing log locations is the way to go. Any other method just seems like making things more complicated than they need to be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
1 year ago
I'd have to go with Option B. Counting the components in pgstartreplication and comparing to the total Followers sounds like a good way to validate the setup.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
1 year ago
It does seem like a straightforward way to confirm the setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
1 year ago
I would also choose Option B for validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeann
1 year ago
Agreed, counting the components seems like a reliable method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
1 year ago
I think Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tonette
1 year ago
Option D is a bit convoluted. Retrieving credentials from a test app and comparing them seems like an unnecessary extra step when simpler options are available.
upvoted 0 times
Rosio
1 year ago
C) Validate that the Follower container ID matches the node in the info endpoint on the Leader.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
1 year ago
B) Count the number of components in pgstartreplication and compare this to the total number of Followers in the deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
1 year ago
A) Compare the pgcurrentxlog_locationlocation from the Leader to the Follower you need to validate against.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Albina
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Validating the Follower container ID against the Leader's info endpoint would provide a good cross-check on the Follower's identity.
upvoted 0 times
Cherrie
1 year ago
Validating the Follower container ID against the Leader's info endpoint does sound like a solid method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
1 year ago
I think Option A could also work, comparing the pgcurrentxlog_locationlocation could provide a good indication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
1 year ago
I agree, Option C seems like the most reliable way to confirm the Follower's identity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonne
1 year ago
Option A seems the most straightforward way to confirm the Follower's copy of the database. Comparing the log location between the Leader and Follower is a reliable method.
upvoted 0 times
Pearlie
1 year ago
True, but comparing the log location seems like a more direct way to confirm the database copy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
1 year ago
Counting the components in pgstartreplication could also be helpful to verify the status of the Followers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
1 year ago
I agree, it's important to ensure that the Follower has an up-to-date copy of the database.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
1 year ago
Option A seems the most straightforward way to confirm the Follower's copy of the database. Comparing the log location between the Leader and Follower is a reliable method.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fannie
1 year ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. Let's see what others think before making a final decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Validate that the Follower container ID matches the node in the info endpoint on the Leader.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Compare the pgcurrentxlog_locationlocation from the Leader to the Follower you need to validate against.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel