MENU
What drawbacks initially prevented the widespread acceptance and use of Opportunistic Key Caching (OKC)?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CWSP-208 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
MA
Maia
6 months ago
Overall, A and B seem like the main issues for me.
BR
Brigette
6 months ago
D is frustrating. Delays in certification hurt adoption.
LE
Lera
6 months ago
C is a problem for older devices. They can't handle it.
AM
Amber
6 months ago
But B makes sense too. Lack of standards slowed things down.
WA
Wayne
6 months ago
Agreed, sharing keys can lead to serious vulnerabilities.
RE
Renea
7 months ago
I think option A is a big concern. Security is crucial.
DO
Domonique
7 months ago
B) and D) together really stalled OKC's rollout.
WI
Willie
7 months ago
Wait, D) really? I thought the Wi-Fi Alliance was on it.
AS
Ashton
8 months ago
C) was a major issue, legacy devices just couldn't keep up.
PA
Pamella
8 months ago
Totally agree with B), no standards really held things back.
ED
Edison
8 months ago
A) is spot on, those vulnerabilities were a big deal.
JU
Julieta
8 months ago
Processor-intensive crypto, that's a real killer for old hardware. C is the winner.
CA
Carylon
8 months ago
Haha, the Wi-Fi Alliance must have been sleeping on the job with option D!
CO
Cordelia
8 months ago
C is the correct answer. Legacy devices couldn't handle the crypto overhead.
KA
Kathrine
9 months ago
I agree, option B makes sense. Lack of standards would delay adoption.
GL
Glendora
9 months ago
I feel like the delays from the Wi-Fi Alliance were a significant factor too. It’s frustrating when certification processes hold back technology like OKC.
RO
Roslyn
9 months ago
I think the lack of standards played a big role in delaying client support. It seems like every time I looked into OKC, there were issues with compatibility.
LI
Lindsey
9 months ago
I remember reading about how sharing cached keys could lead to vulnerabilities, but I'm not sure if that was the main reason for the slow adoption of OKC.
DA
Dana
9 months ago
Ugh, this is the kind of question I struggle with. All these technical details about Wi-Fi protocols and certifications - it's just not my strong suit. I'll have to take my best guess and hope for the partial credit.
CH
Chauncey
10 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The key seems to be identifying the main reasons why OKC wasn't widely adopted at first, like the lack of standards and client support. I think I can narrow this down to the best answer.
RO
Rolande
10 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I need to carefully read through each option and think about how those factors could have impacted the early acceptance of OKC. Gotta make sure I understand the technical concepts involved.
SH
Shaun
10 months ago
Option A seems plausible. Sharing keys could definitely create vulnerabilities.
AN
Annice
10 months ago
I vaguely recall something about the cryptography being too heavy for older devices. Was it TKIP that struggled with the key exchanges?
AM
Amber
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think I need to focus on understanding the key drawbacks that initially prevented widespread adoption of OKC. The options mention things like vulnerabilities, lack of standards, and performance issues.
LI
Lino
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. It seems to be asking about some technical details of Opportunistic Key Caching that I'm not too familiar with.
AH
Ahmed
5 months ago
All these factors combined made it tough for OKC to take off.
AL
Albert
5 months ago
What about the issues with older devices? They struggled with the cryptography.
TR
Troy
6 months ago
I read that sharing cached keys was a big vulnerability too.
NE
Nell
10 months ago
I think the lack of standards really hurt OKC's adoption.
JO
Josephine
11 months ago
Yeah, and the delays from the Wi-Fi Alliance didn't help either.