CWNP Exam CWSP-207 Topic 4 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWSP-207 exam

Question #: 24
Topic #: 4

Given: You support a coffee shop and have recently installed a free 802.11ac wireless hot-spot for the benefit of your customers. You want to minimize legal risk in the event that the hot-spot is used for illegal Internet activity.

What option specifies the best approach to minimize legal risk at this public hot-spot while maintaining an open venue for customer Internet access?

AConfigure WPA2-Enterprise security on the access point

BBlock TCP port 25 and 80 outbound on the Internet router

CRequire client STAs to have updated firewall and antivirus software

DAllow only trusted patrons to use the WLAN

EUse a WIPS to monitor all traffic and deauthenticate malicious stations

FImplement a captive portal with an acceptable use disclaimer

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Joaquin at Mar 07, 2025, 10:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWSP-207 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lino

2 months ago

Requiring trusted patrons only? What is this, a members-only club? Nah, the captive portal is the way to go. Keeps it open but covers your butt.

upvoted 0 times

Rosio

1 months ago

E) Use a WIPS to monitor all traffic and deauthenticate malicious stations

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitzie

2 months ago

F) Implement a captive portal with an acceptable use disclaimer

upvoted 0 times

...

France

2 months ago

A) Configure WPA2-Enterprise security on the access point

upvoted 0 times

...

Ligia

2 months ago

E sounds interesting, but a WIPS might be overkill for a small coffee shop. Keep it simple with the captive portal, I say.

upvoted 0 times

...

Xuan

3 months ago

Haha, blocking ports 25 and 80? That's like trying to stop people from drinking coffee by taking away the cups! Option F is clearly the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Margot

1 months ago

User 3: Plus, it helps protect the coffee shop from any legal issues that may arise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

2 months ago

User 2: Definitely, it sets clear expectations for customers using the hot-spot.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scarlet

2 months ago

User 1: I agree, a captive portal with an acceptable use disclaimer is the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantay

3 months ago

Option C seems a bit too restrictive. Requiring updated software on all clients could be a hassle for customers and limit accessibility. I'd go with the captive portal route.

upvoted 0 times

Howard

28 days ago

Definitely, it sets clear expectations for users while still providing open access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

1 months ago

Agreed, it's a good balance between security and accessibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scot

1 months ago

Captive portal with a disclaimer sounds like the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

2 months ago

F) Implement a captive portal with an acceptable use disclaimer

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

2 months ago

E) Use a WIPS to monitor all traffic and deauthenticate malicious stations

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleta

2 months ago

D) Allow only trusted patrons to use the WLAN

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassandra

2 months ago

C) Require client STAs to have updated firewall and antivirus software

upvoted 0 times

...

Caprice

2 months ago

B) Block TCP port 25 and 80 outbound on the Internet router

upvoted 0 times

...

Madonna

3 months ago

A) Configure WPA2-Enterprise security on the access point

upvoted 0 times

...

Mike

3 months ago

I think option F is the best approach. A captive portal with an acceptable use disclaimer will help cover the coffee shop's legal liability while still providing open internet access for customers.

upvoted 0 times

...