Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CWNP CWSP-207 Exam - Topic 4 Question 24 Discussion

Given: You support a coffee shop and have recently installed a free 802.11ac wireless hot-spot for the benefit of your customers. You want to minimize legal risk in the event that the hot-spot is used for illegal Internet activity.What option specifies the best approach to minimize legal risk at this public hot-spot while maintaining an open venue for customer Internet access?
C) Require client STAs to have updated firewall and antivirus software
A) Configure WPA2-Enterprise security on the access point
B) Block TCP port 25 and 80 outbound on the Internet router
D) Allow only trusted patrons to use the WLAN
E) Use a WIPS to monitor all traffic and deauthenticate malicious stations
F) Implement a captive portal with an acceptable use disclaimer

CWNP CWSP-207 Exam - Topic 4 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWSP-207 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 4
[All CWSP-207 Questions]

Given: You support a coffee shop and have recently installed a free 802.11ac wireless hot-spot for the benefit of your customers. You want to minimize legal risk in the event that the hot-spot is used for illegal Internet activity.

What option specifies the best approach to minimize legal risk at this public hot-spot while maintaining an open venue for customer Internet access?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Joaquin at Mar 07, 2025, 10:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWSP-207 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Fletcher
9 months ago
I agree with F, at least it sets clear rules for everyone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
9 months ago
WPA2-Enterprise sounds complicated for a coffee shop, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
9 months ago
Wait, can you really block illegal activity just with a disclaimer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
9 months ago
Not sure about that, D seems more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
9 months ago
I think option F is the best way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
10 months ago
Allowing only trusted patrons seems too restrictive for a coffee shop. I feel like the captive portal option is more balanced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
10 months ago
I think requiring updated firewall and antivirus software is a bit unrealistic for a public hot-spot. Most customers won't have that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
10 months ago
I'm not sure if blocking TCP ports is enough to minimize legal risk. It feels like it might just be a temporary fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
10 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of a captive portal in class. It seems like a good way to inform users about acceptable use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
10 months ago
Using a WIPS to monitor traffic and kick off malicious users could work, but that might be a bit heavy-handed. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
11 months ago
Configuring WPA2-Enterprise seems like overkill for a public hotspot. We want to make it easy for customers to connect, not add extra hoops to jump through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
11 months ago
Okay, I think the captive portal with an acceptable use disclaimer is the way to go here. That lets us set clear expectations for users while still keeping the hotspot open.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Blocking ports and requiring updated software could help, but might be too restrictive for a public hotspot. I'll need to review the options closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the legal risks and how to balance that with providing open access for customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
11 months ago
Implementing a captive portal with an acceptable use disclaimer sounds like a good compromise. That way customers can still access the internet, but there's a clear policy in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
11 months ago
Configuring WPA2-Enterprise security seems like it could work, but that might be too restrictive for a public hotspot. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is finding the right approach to minimize legal liability without overly restricting customer access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the options and see which one best addresses the legal risk while still maintaining an open venue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the legal risks and how to balance that with providing open access for customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
1 year ago
Requiring trusted patrons only? What is this, a members-only club? Nah, the captive portal is the way to go. Keeps it open but covers your butt.
upvoted 0 times
Rosio
1 year ago
E) Use a WIPS to monitor all traffic and deauthenticate malicious stations
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
1 year ago
F) Implement a captive portal with an acceptable use disclaimer
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 year ago
A) Configure WPA2-Enterprise security on the access point
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ligia
1 year ago
E sounds interesting, but a WIPS might be overkill for a small coffee shop. Keep it simple with the captive portal, I say.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
1 year ago
Haha, blocking ports 25 and 80? That's like trying to stop people from drinking coffee by taking away the cups! Option F is clearly the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Margot
1 year ago
User 3: Plus, it helps protect the coffee shop from any legal issues that may arise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, it sets clear expectations for customers using the hot-spot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, a captive portal with an acceptable use disclaimer is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chantay
1 year ago
Option C seems a bit too restrictive. Requiring updated software on all clients could be a hassle for customers and limit accessibility. I'd go with the captive portal route.
upvoted 0 times
Howard
1 year ago
Definitely, it sets clear expectations for users while still providing open access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
1 year ago
Agreed, it's a good balance between security and accessibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
1 year ago
Captive portal with a disclaimer sounds like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
1 year ago
F) Implement a captive portal with an acceptable use disclaimer
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
1 year ago
E) Use a WIPS to monitor all traffic and deauthenticate malicious stations
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
1 year ago
D) Allow only trusted patrons to use the WLAN
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
1 year ago
C) Require client STAs to have updated firewall and antivirus software
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
1 year ago
B) Block TCP port 25 and 80 outbound on the Internet router
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
1 year ago
A) Configure WPA2-Enterprise security on the access point
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mike
1 year ago
I think option F is the best approach. A captive portal with an acceptable use disclaimer will help cover the coffee shop's legal liability while still providing open internet access for customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
1 year ago
I personally think option C is important too. Having updated firewall and antivirus software can prevent illegal activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
1 year ago
I agree with Nicolette. Option F also helps in case legal issues arise, as customers have acknowledged the terms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
1 year ago
I think option F is the best approach. It ensures that customers are aware of acceptable use policies.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel