Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CWNP CWSP-207 Exam - Topic 2 Question 12 Discussion

You are implementing an 802.11ac WLAN and a WIPS at the same time. You must choose between integrated and overlay WIPS solutions. Which of the following statements is true regarding integrated WIPS solutions?
C) Many integrated WIPS solutions that detect Voice over Wi-Fi traffic will cease scanning altogether to accommodate the latency sensitive client traffic.
A) Integrated WIPS always perform better from a client throughput perspective because the same radio that performs the threat scanning also services the clients.
B) Integrated WIPS use special sensors installed alongside the APs to scan for threats.
D) Integrated WIPS is always more expensive than overlay WIPS.

CWNP CWSP-207 Exam - Topic 2 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWSP-207 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 2
[All CWSP-207 Questions]

You are implementing an 802.11ac WLAN and a WIPS at the same time. You must choose between integrated and overlay WIPS solutions. Which of the following statements is true regarding integrated WIPS solutions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Sabina at Sep 12, 2024, 11:15 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWSP-207 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Izetta
7 months ago
Not always more expensive, depends on the specific solutions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
8 months ago
True, many integrated WIPS do prioritize client traffic over scanning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Romana
8 months ago
Surprised to hear that integrated WIPS might stop scanning for VoWiFi!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
8 months ago
I disagree, that doesn't always mean better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
8 months ago
Integrated WIPS can boost client throughput since they share the same radio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
9 months ago
I don't think integrated WIPS are always more expensive than overlay ones; it seems like pricing can vary based on features and deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
9 months ago
I feel like I saw a question about integrated WIPS and VoWiFi traffic before, and it mentioned something about scanning being paused for latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
9 months ago
I think integrated WIPS might use the same radios for scanning and serving clients, but I can't recall if that's a definite advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
9 months ago
I remember studying that integrated WIPS solutions can impact client throughput, but I'm not sure if they always perform better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
9 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this. Integrated WIPS can be more efficient, but they may not handle latency-sensitive traffic as well. I'll select the option that best reflects that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
9 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Integrated WIPS use the same radios as the APs, so they may impact client throughput. But the overlay solution requires additional hardware, so it could be more expensive. I'll weigh those factors carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
9 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the pros and cons of integrated vs. overlay WIPS solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the question. I'll need to review my notes on the differences between integrated and overlay WIPS before I can decide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
9 months ago
Exporting the relevant customer data on the Salesforce Platform first before making any changes seems like a smart strategy to me. That way we can retain the information if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards "Statistically" because we did a similar practice question that emphasized statistical methods in risk evaluation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
2 years ago
Option B sounds like the IT version of a 'spy versus spy' situation. Gotta keep those pesky threats under surveillance, am I right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Milly
2 years ago
B) Option B sounds like the IT version of a 'spy versus spy' situation. Gotta keep those pesky threats under surveillance, am I right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
2 years ago
C) Many integrated WIPS solutions that detect Voice over Wi-Fi traffic will cease scanning altogether to accommodate the latency sensitive client traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
2 years ago
B) Integrated WIPS use special sensors installed alongside the APs to scan for threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
2 years ago
A) Integrated WIPS always perform better from a client throughput perspective because the same radio that performs the threat scanning also services the clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ben
2 years ago
I heard that integrated WIPS solutions can be more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
2 years ago
Option D, huh? Well, I guess the saying 'you get what you pay for' applies here. Ain't no such thing as a free lunch, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 years ago
Ah, the age-old battle between integrated and overlay WIPS. Why can't they just make it simple and give us an all-in-one solution that works flawlessly? *sigh*
upvoted 0 times
Horace
2 years ago
C) Many integrated WIPS solutions that detect Voice over Wi-Fi traffic will cease scanning altogether to accommodate the latency sensitive client traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
2 years ago
B) Integrated WIPS use special sensors installed alongside the APs to scan for threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
2 years ago
A) Integrated WIPS always perform better from a client throughput perspective because the same radio that performs the threat scanning also services the clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodolfo
2 years ago
I believe integrated WIPS solutions can impact client throughput.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
2 years ago
Option A sounds tempting, but I don't want to get carried away by the idea of 'better client throughput'. Gotta consider the bigger picture, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
2 years ago
I disagree, overlay WIPS solutions provide better threat scanning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
2 years ago
I think integrated WIPS solutions are more convenient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
2 years ago
Hmm, I think option C is the correct answer here. No way am I going to let my VOIP traffic get interrupted by threat scanning, that's just bad news for my business calls.
upvoted 0 times
Candida
2 years ago
Lai: True, but I still think option C is the safest bet for maintaining quality VOIP calls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
2 years ago
I think option B is also a valid point, having special sensors dedicated to scanning for threats could be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 years ago
But what about option A? Wouldn't having the same radio for threat scanning and client service be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
2 years ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice to ensure smooth VOIP traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
2 years ago
Yeah, I definitely don't want any interruptions in my business calls. Option C it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 years ago
I agree, option C makes the most sense. We can't afford to have our VOIP calls disrupted.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel