Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CWNP CWSP-207 Exam - Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

ABC Company requires the ability to identify and quickly locate rogue devices. ABC has chosen an overlay WIPS solution with sensors that use dipole antennas to perform this task. Use your knowledge of location tracking techniques to answer the question.In what ways can this 802.11-based WIPS platform determine the location of rogue laptops or APs? (Choose 3)
A) Time Difference of Arrival (TDoA) and C) Trilateration of RSSI measurements and E) RF Fingerprinting
B) Angle of Arrival (AoA)
D) GPS Positioning

CWNP CWSP-207 Exam - Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWSP-207 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 1
[All CWSP-207 Questions]

ABC Company requires the ability to identify and quickly locate rogue devices. ABC has chosen an overlay WIPS solution with sensors that use dipole antennas to perform this task. Use your knowledge of location tracking techniques to answer the question.

In what ways can this 802.11-based WIPS platform determine the location of rogue laptops or APs? (Choose 3)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, E

by Dalene at Sep 19, 2024, 11:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWSP-207 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Roy
9 months ago
I thought TDoA was less accurate than AoA, though?
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
9 months ago
RF Fingerprinting is super effective for rogue detection!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
9 months ago
Wait, GPS? In a WIPS? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
10 months ago
Definitely agree, trilateration is key too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
10 months ago
TDoA and AoA are solid methods for locating devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question where trilateration was the right answer, but I’m not confident about whether TDoA or AoA is the better choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
10 months ago
RF fingerprinting sounds familiar, and I believe it can help identify devices, but I’m a bit confused about how it works alongside the other methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
10 months ago
I think trilateration using RSSI is definitely one of the methods, but I can't recall if GPS positioning is relevant for rogue devices in a WIPS context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
11 months ago
I remember studying TDoA and AoA techniques, but I'm not entirely sure how they apply specifically to WIPS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
11 months ago
This seems straightforward. The WIPS platform is using dipole antennas, so AoA, TDoA, and RSSI trilateration are the obvious choices. I'll mark those three and move on to the next question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key here is that the WIPS uses dipole antennas, so techniques like AoA and TDoA that leverage antenna directionality should work well. Trilateration of RSSI is also a good bet. I've got a good handle on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions an 802.11-based WIPS, so I'm not sure if GPS positioning would be a valid option. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward. The WIPS platform uses dipole antennas, so I think the location techniques involving angle and time measurements would be the most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the different location tracking techniques mentioned. I'll need to review my notes on things like TDoA, AoA, and RF fingerprinting to make sure I understand how they work and which ones would be most applicable here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
11 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. Option A about the IAM role is the obvious solution here. I'll mark that one down and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the rogue devices are trying to 'fingerprint' their way out of detection. Good luck with that! A, B, and C are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
2 years ago
Definitely A, B, and C. GPS positioning (D) is a bit overkill for an indoor WIPS, and RF fingerprinting (E) is more of a backup option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
2 years ago
A, B, and C. Seems like a solid WIPS setup with the dipole antennas. TDoA, AoA, and RSSI trilateration should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
2 years ago
RF Fingerprinting could work, but it's more complex to set up. The other 3 options are the standard go-to methods for this type of WIPS solution.
upvoted 0 times
Yen
2 years ago
D: RF Fingerprinting may be more complex, but it can provide valuable information for tracking rogue devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
2 years ago
C: Angle of Arrival (AoA) is another effective technique for identifying and locating rogue devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
2 years ago
B: Time Difference of Arrival (TDoA) can also be used to pinpoint the location of rogue laptops or APs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
2 years ago
A: Trilateration of RSSI measurements is a common method for locating rogue devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherelle
2 years ago
Ha! GPS positioning? Really? As if rogue devices would have a GPS receiver. That's a funny one.
upvoted 0 times
Loreta
2 years ago
A: Definitely, they wouldn't have GPS receivers. Trilateration and RF Fingerprinting make more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
2 years ago
B: Yeah, GPS positioning for rogue devices sounds unrealistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
2 years ago
A: Trilateration of RSSI measurements, RF Fingerprinting, Angle of Arrival (AoA)
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
2 years ago
E) RF Fingerprinting
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
2 years ago
C) Trilateration of RSSI measurements
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
2 years ago
A) Time Difference of Arrival (TDoA)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erick
2 years ago
I agree with Elbert. Those are the top 3 techniques for locating rogue APs and laptops on an 802.11 WIPS platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
2 years ago
Definitely TDoA, AoA, and Trilateration of RSSI. That's the way to go for identifying rogue devices.
upvoted 0 times
Arlyne
2 years ago
GPS Positioning and RF Fingerprinting are not as effective for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
2 years ago
Trilateration of RSSI measurements can definitely help pinpoint the exact location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
2 years ago
I think AoA is also important for accurate positioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
2 years ago
I agree, TDoA is crucial for locating rogue devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eulah
2 years ago
I also believe RF Fingerprinting can be used to determine the location of rogue laptops or APs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
2 years ago
I agree with Leontine, Trilateration of RSSI measurements is a common technique for locating rogue devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
2 years ago
I think the WIPS platform can determine location using Trilateration of RSSI measurements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel