Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP CWISA-103 Exam - Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWISA-103 exam

Question #: 5
Topic #: 1

[All CWISA-103 Questions]

What is a valid reason to continue using older wireless networking technologies?

AThe desire for faster communications

BThe desire to support internal antennas

CThe desire to use older encryption processes, which are faster regardless of the CPU implemented

DA requirement to support legacy devices

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

Legacy Support:The primary reason to continue using older wireless technologies is the need to connect with devices that don't support newer standards (e.g., old sensors or equipment).

Other Reasons (Not as Strong):

Cost:Replacing legacy devices can be expensive.

Reliability:Some legacy technologies might be well-proven in specific settings.

by Kizzy at Oct 04, 2025, 08:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWISA-103 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Celestine

5 months ago

Exactly! Some setups just work better with older tech.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharee

5 months ago

I feel like B is overlooked. Internal antennas can be a factor.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micah

5 months ago

Safety aside, D covers more ground for businesses.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chana

6 months ago

C is interesting. Older encryption can be faster, but is it safe?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jillian

6 months ago

True, but not all need speed. Some rely on legacy systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

6 months ago

But what about A? Faster communications are important too.

upvoted 0 times

...

James

7 months ago

Totally agree with D! Can't just ditch old devices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trinidad

7 months ago

Wait, are we really still using those old technologies? Seems outdated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonette

7 months ago

C makes sense too, those older encryption processes can be quicker.

upvoted 0 times

...

Danica

7 months ago

I think A is more important. Faster is always better!

upvoted 0 times

...

Merrilee

7 months ago

D is definitely a valid reason! Legacy devices need support.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

7 months ago

I might be overthinking it, but I thought faster communications would always be a priority, so A seems off to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Troy

8 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I feel like supporting legacy devices is a common reason to stick with older tech.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ocie

8 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about older encryption processes being less secure, so maybe C isn't a good reason?

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgeanna

8 months ago

I think option D makes sense because many businesses still rely on legacy devices that can't upgrade to newer technologies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

8 months ago

Agreed! Older tech is crucial for compatibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donette

8 months ago

I think D is the best choice. Legacy devices need support.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiann

9 months ago

I'm with Sarah on this one. D) is the only option that makes sense in the real world.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

9 months ago

Haha, who still uses older encryption these days? D) all the way!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lilli

9 months ago

C) sounds tempting, but let's be real - security should come before speed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

10 months ago

D) is the way to go. Gotta keep those legacy devices connected, even if they're slower.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daron

10 months ago

D) A requirement to support legacy devices is the correct answer. Older wireless technologies are still needed to support older devices that can't use the latest standards.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brianne

10 months ago

I think the key here is to consider the real-world needs of the organization or users. Legacy device support seems like the most valid reason to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

10 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. I know older wireless tech can be slower, but maybe there are other benefits like cost or compatibility that make it worth using in some cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Esteban

10 months ago

Okay, I've got it! The answer is D. Older wireless tech is often needed to support legacy devices that can't use the latest standards.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marion

11 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky question. I'm leaning towards D, since supporting legacy devices is a common reason to stick with older wireless standards.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leana

11 months ago

I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of older wireless tech to figure out a good answer.

upvoted 0 times

Melissa

5 months ago

True, but not all upgrades are necessary for every setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sabrina

5 months ago

Definitely! Some businesses still rely on older tech.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

9 months ago

But faster communications are always appealing too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josue

9 months ago

I think supporting legacy devices is a big reason.

upvoted 0 times

...

...