Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CWNP CWISA-102 Exam - Topic 2 Question 14 Discussion

Which one of the following location tracking technologies is most energy efficient in typical implementations?
C) GPS
A) BLE Beacons
B) Cellular
D) Wi-Fi

CWNP CWISA-102 Exam - Topic 2 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWISA-102 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 2
[All CWISA-102 Questions]

Which one of the following location tracking technologies is most energy efficient in typical implementations?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Browser Ubiquity:JavaScript has a native runtime environment within almost every modern web browser, making it the 'built-in' scripting language for web-based interfaces.

Node-RED:This IoT flow-based programming tool specifically uses JavaScript for its logic and automation functions.

Other Languages:

PHP: Primarily server-side for web applications

Python: Versatile language, used in some back-end IoT functions but not natively in browsers

R: Statistical and data analysis, not typically embedded in wireless solutions

References:

JavaScript (Browser Compatibility):Documentation of its near-universal support

Node-RED (Programming Model):Descriptions of how it uses JavaScript for node logic.


by Truman at Jul 16, 2024, 05:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWISA-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ahmed
6 months ago
Wi-Fi is decent, but not as good as BLE for energy use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
6 months ago
Really? I didn't know BLE Beacons were that good!
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
7 months ago
Cellular drains battery fast, no way it's efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
7 months ago
I thought GPS was the best for accuracy though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
7 months ago
BLE Beacons are super energy efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
7 months ago
I feel like BLE Beacons are the right choice, but I also recall that Wi-Fi can be optimized for energy use in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
7 months ago
Cellular seems like it could be energy-intensive, but I’m not confident about the comparison with Wi-Fi.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
8 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think GPS uses a lot of battery compared to the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
8 months ago
I think BLE Beacons might be the most energy efficient since they’re designed for low power consumption, but I’m not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
8 months ago
BLE Beacons are definitely the way to go here. They have such a low power draw compared to the other options. As long as you don't need super-accurate location tracking, BLE Beacons are the most energy-efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know the energy efficiency can vary a lot depending on the specific implementation, so it's hard to generalize. I'll have to review my notes on the power consumption of these technologies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
8 months ago
GPS seems like it would be the least energy-efficient since it requires constant communication with satellites. I'm leaning towards BLE Beacons or Cellular as the better options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
8 months ago
I think BLE Beacons would be the most energy-efficient option here. They have a really low power consumption compared to the other technologies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'd have to think through the pros and cons of each technology to decide which is the most energy-efficient. Maybe I'll start by comparing the power requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
8 months ago
I think the smartiomode mount option and the sfcache command are the two methods to control Veritas SmartIO caching. The question is pretty straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to review my notes on internal control and risk assessment to make sure I understand the concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
1 year ago
Cellular? More like 'Cellularly Draining' if you ask me. I'm sticking with BLE Beacons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm thinking Wi-Fi might be the way to go. It's like the lazy cat of location tech - it just lounges around and sips energy.
upvoted 0 times
Mayra
11 months ago
GPS might not be the best option if you're looking for energy efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
12 months ago
I would go with BLE Beacons. They are known for being low energy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
12 months ago
I agree, Wi-Fi is a smart option for energy efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
12 months ago
Yeah, Wi-Fi is like the lazy cat of location tech.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
12 months ago
Wi-Fi is a good choice, it's energy efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
12 months ago
I think Wi-Fi is a good choice too. It's definitely energy efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
12 months ago
D) Wi-Fi
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
1 year ago
C) GPS
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
1 year ago
B) Cellular
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
1 year ago
A) BLE Beacons
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerry
1 year ago
GPS just screams 'battery sucker' to me. I'll pass on that one for sure.
upvoted 0 times
Barb
12 months ago
BLE Beacons are definitely the way to go for energy efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
1 year ago
I agree, GPS drains my battery too quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 year ago
D) Wi-Fi
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
1 year ago
A) BLE Beacons
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ben
1 year ago
I'd bet my money on BLE Beacons. Those things are like the energy sippers of the location tracking world!
upvoted 0 times
Gussie
1 year ago
Yeah, I've heard that too. They're great for conserving battery life.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 year ago
I agree, BLE Beacons are definitely the most energy efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vivan
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think Wi-Fi might also be energy efficient in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
1 year ago
I agree with Santos, BLE Beacons require less power compared to GPS or Cellular.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
1 year ago
I think BLE Beacons are the most energy efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel