Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CWNP CWISA-102 Exam - Topic 2 Question 14 Discussion

Which one of the following location tracking technologies is most energy efficient in typical implementations?
C) GPS
A) BLE Beacons
B) Cellular
D) Wi-Fi

CWNP CWISA-102 Exam - Topic 2 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWISA-102 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 2
[All CWISA-102 Questions]

Which one of the following location tracking technologies is most energy efficient in typical implementations?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Browser Ubiquity:JavaScript has a native runtime environment within almost every modern web browser, making it the 'built-in' scripting language for web-based interfaces.

Node-RED:This IoT flow-based programming tool specifically uses JavaScript for its logic and automation functions.

Other Languages:

PHP: Primarily server-side for web applications

Python: Versatile language, used in some back-end IoT functions but not natively in browsers

R: Statistical and data analysis, not typically embedded in wireless solutions

References:

JavaScript (Browser Compatibility):Documentation of its near-universal support

Node-RED (Programming Model):Descriptions of how it uses JavaScript for node logic.


by Truman at Jul 16, 2024, 05:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWISA-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ahmed
9 months ago
Wi-Fi is decent, but not as good as BLE for energy use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
9 months ago
Really? I didn't know BLE Beacons were that good!
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
10 months ago
Cellular drains battery fast, no way it's efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
10 months ago
I thought GPS was the best for accuracy though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
10 months ago
BLE Beacons are super energy efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
10 months ago
I feel like BLE Beacons are the right choice, but I also recall that Wi-Fi can be optimized for energy use in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
11 months ago
Cellular seems like it could be energy-intensive, but I’m not confident about the comparison with Wi-Fi.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
11 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think GPS uses a lot of battery compared to the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
11 months ago
I think BLE Beacons might be the most energy efficient since they’re designed for low power consumption, but I’m not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
11 months ago
BLE Beacons are definitely the way to go here. They have such a low power draw compared to the other options. As long as you don't need super-accurate location tracking, BLE Beacons are the most energy-efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know the energy efficiency can vary a lot depending on the specific implementation, so it's hard to generalize. I'll have to review my notes on the power consumption of these technologies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
11 months ago
GPS seems like it would be the least energy-efficient since it requires constant communication with satellites. I'm leaning towards BLE Beacons or Cellular as the better options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
11 months ago
I think BLE Beacons would be the most energy-efficient option here. They have a really low power consumption compared to the other technologies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'd have to think through the pros and cons of each technology to decide which is the most energy-efficient. Maybe I'll start by comparing the power requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
11 months ago
I think the smartiomode mount option and the sfcache command are the two methods to control Veritas SmartIO caching. The question is pretty straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to review my notes on internal control and risk assessment to make sure I understand the concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
1 year ago
Cellular? More like 'Cellularly Draining' if you ask me. I'm sticking with BLE Beacons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm thinking Wi-Fi might be the way to go. It's like the lazy cat of location tech - it just lounges around and sips energy.
upvoted 0 times
Mayra
1 year ago
GPS might not be the best option if you're looking for energy efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
1 year ago
I would go with BLE Beacons. They are known for being low energy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
1 year ago
I agree, Wi-Fi is a smart option for energy efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
1 year ago
Yeah, Wi-Fi is like the lazy cat of location tech.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
1 year ago
Wi-Fi is a good choice, it's energy efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 year ago
I think Wi-Fi is a good choice too. It's definitely energy efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
1 year ago
D) Wi-Fi
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
1 year ago
C) GPS
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
1 year ago
B) Cellular
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
1 year ago
A) BLE Beacons
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerry
1 year ago
GPS just screams 'battery sucker' to me. I'll pass on that one for sure.
upvoted 0 times
Barb
1 year ago
BLE Beacons are definitely the way to go for energy efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
1 year ago
I agree, GPS drains my battery too quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 year ago
D) Wi-Fi
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
1 year ago
A) BLE Beacons
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ben
1 year ago
I'd bet my money on BLE Beacons. Those things are like the energy sippers of the location tracking world!
upvoted 0 times
Gussie
1 year ago
Yeah, I've heard that too. They're great for conserving battery life.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 year ago
I agree, BLE Beacons are definitely the most energy efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vivan
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think Wi-Fi might also be energy efficient in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
1 year ago
I agree with Santos, BLE Beacons require less power compared to GPS or Cellular.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
1 year ago
I think BLE Beacons are the most energy efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel