CWNP Exam CWISA-102 Topic 2 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWISA-102 exam

Question #: 14
Topic #: 2

[All CWISA-102 Questions]

Which one of the following location tracking technologies is most energy efficient in typical implementations?

ABLE Beacons

BCellular

CGPS

DWi-Fi

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Browser Ubiquity:JavaScript has a native runtime environment within almost every modern web browser, making it the 'built-in' scripting language for web-based interfaces.

Node-RED:This IoT flow-based programming tool specifically uses JavaScript for its logic and automation functions.

Other Languages:

PHP: Primarily server-side for web applications

Python: Versatile language, used in some back-end IoT functions but not natively in browsers

R: Statistical and data analysis, not typically embedded in wireless solutions

References:

JavaScript (Browser Compatibility):Documentation of its near-universal support

Node-RED (Programming Model):Descriptions of how it uses JavaScript for node logic.

by Truman at Jul 16, 2024, 05:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWISA-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Sharen

2 months ago

Cellular? More like 'Cellularly Draining' if you ask me. I'm sticking with BLE Beacons.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyda

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm thinking Wi-Fi might be the way to go. It's like the lazy cat of location tech - it just lounges around and sips energy.

upvoted 0 times

Mayra

26 days ago

GPS might not be the best option if you're looking for energy efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eva

1 months ago

I would go with BLE Beacons. They are known for being low energy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sang

1 months ago

I agree, Wi-Fi is a smart option for energy efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

1 months ago

Yeah, Wi-Fi is like the lazy cat of location tech.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenda

1 months ago

Wi-Fi is a good choice, it's energy efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emilio

1 months ago

I think Wi-Fi is a good choice too. It's definitely energy efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

1 months ago

D) Wi-Fi

upvoted 0 times

...

Nenita

2 months ago

C) GPS

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

2 months ago

B) Cellular

upvoted 0 times

...

Terina

2 months ago

A) BLE Beacons

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

3 months ago

GPS just screams 'battery sucker' to me. I'll pass on that one for sure.

upvoted 0 times

Barb

1 months ago

BLE Beacons are definitely the way to go for energy efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colette

2 months ago

I agree, GPS drains my battery too quickly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Buck

2 months ago

D) Wi-Fi

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

3 months ago

A) BLE Beacons

upvoted 0 times

...

Ben

3 months ago

I'd bet my money on BLE Beacons. Those things are like the energy sippers of the location tracking world!

upvoted 0 times

Gussie

3 months ago

Yeah, I've heard that too. They're great for conserving battery life.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hoa

3 months ago

I agree, BLE Beacons are definitely the most energy efficient option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vivan

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think Wi-Fi might also be energy efficient in some cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

3 months ago

I agree with Santos, BLE Beacons require less power compared to GPS or Cellular.

upvoted 0 times

...

Santos

3 months ago

I think BLE Beacons are the most energy efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...