Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA SY0-701 Exam - Topic 5 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's SY0-701 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 5
[All SY0-701 Questions]

A company receives an alert that a network device vendor, which is widely used in the enterprise, has been banned by the government.

Which option best will the company's general counsel most likely be concerned with during a hardware refresh of these devices?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When the government bans a vendor, the primary concern for the company's general counsel is sanctions, which are legal restrictions that prohibit the purchase, use, import, or continued operation of products associated with restricted entities. Security+ SY0-701 stresses that compliance with government regulations and legal mandates is a critical oversight responsibility. Failure to comply may result in severe penalties, including fines, loss of contracting eligibility, and reputational damage.

During a hardware refresh, general counsel will ensure the organization is not violating federal trade sanctions, procurement laws, or export/import restrictions. Even if devices are already purchased, continued use may still violate the sanctions, creating legal liability.

Data sovereignty (B) relates to storage location requirements, not vendor bans. Cost of replacement (C) is an operational and financial concern, not a legal one. Loss of license (D) typically applies to software but is not the primary legal concern tied to a government-issued vendor ban.

Therefore, sanctions are the general counsel's primary focus.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lajuana
1 day ago
Haha, I bet the legal team is having a field day with this one. Compliance is gonna be a headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
7 days ago
Hmm, I'd say the biggest concern is finding a suitable replacement that meets all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
12 days ago
Gotta make sure we don't end up on the wrong side of the law. Compliance is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
17 days ago
Compliance with the government ban, of course. Can't risk any legal issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
22 days ago
I feel like there could be concerns about data security too, especially if the devices are no longer supported or updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
27 days ago
This reminds me of a practice question about vendor risk management. I think they might focus on the implications of using non-compliant hardware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about liability and potential legal repercussions if they continue using the banned devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
2 months ago
I think the general counsel would be worried about compliance issues, especially since the vendor is banned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 months ago
This is a good one. I'd make sure to thoroughly review any relevant laws or regulations before recommending a solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
2 months ago
Definitely a complex scenario. I'd focus on understanding the compliance requirements and potential penalties for using the banned devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
Okay, I'd start by looking into the reasons for the vendor ban. That should give me a better sense of what the legal risks could be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
3 months ago
Hmm, the general counsel would probably be most concerned about compliance and liability issues. I'd need to research the specifics of the ban.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
3 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'd need to think through the legal implications of using a banned vendor's devices.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel