Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CompTIA SK0-005 Exam - Topic 2 Question 55 Discussion

A technician is configuring a new server with four disks for the development team. The requirements are disk redundancy and maximum usable disk capacity. Which of the following RAID levels should be used for this server?
D) 10
A) 0
B) 1
C) 5

CompTIA SK0-005 Exam - Topic 2 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's SK0-005 exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 2
[All SK0-005 Questions]

A technician is configuring a new server with four disks for the development team. The requirements are disk redundancy and maximum usable disk capacity. Which of the following RAID levels should be used for this server?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Scenario:Four disks, requiring redundancy and maximum usable capacity.

RAID Level:RAID 10(Option D) is the best choice:

RAID 10 combines mirroring (redundancy) and striping (performance).

RAID 0 lacks redundancy, RAID 1 provides less capacity, and RAID 5 requires more


by Emmanuel at Jun 03, 2024, 10:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SK0-005 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Glenna
10 months ago
RAID 0 is out of the question for redundancy, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
10 months ago
Wait, can RAID 5 really handle multiple disk failures?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
10 months ago
RAID 10 would give better performance, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
10 months ago
Totally agree, RAID 5 balances both!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamar
11 months ago
RAID 5 is the best choice for redundancy and capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about RAID 10; it combines mirroring and striping, but I feel like it might waste too much space for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
11 months ago
RAID 5 might be the best option since it provides redundancy and still allows for some usable capacity, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
11 months ago
I think RAID 1 mirrors the data, but it uses half the capacity for redundancy, which doesn't maximize usable space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
11 months ago
I remember RAID 0 is all about speed but offers no redundancy, so that's definitely not the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the RAID levels and how they work with different numbers of disks. I'll need to review my notes on that before I can confidently answer this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know RAID 5 provides redundancy, but I'm not sure if it maximizes usable disk capacity with four disks. Let me think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
11 months ago
I think this is a pretty straightforward RAID question. The requirements are disk redundancy and maximum usable disk capacity, so I'm going to go with RAID 5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
11 months ago
RAID 0 would give me the maximum usable disk capacity, but that doesn't provide any redundancy. RAID 1 would give me redundancy, but I'd only have half the usable capacity. I think RAID 5 is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I know phased rollouts are common, but I'm not sure I fully grasp the specific benefits the BA is expecting in this case. I'll need to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
12 months ago
This looks like a straightforward SQL query, but I'm not sure about the data type conversion. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
2 years ago
RAID 10 is the perfect solution for this scenario. Redundancy and capacity? Chef's kiss!
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
2 years ago
RAID 10 is the way to go! Gotta keep that data safe, you know? Plus, it's not like we're running a server farm or anything, right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
2 years ago
Wait, isn't RAID 0 the one where you just slap the disks together and hope for the best? I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
2 years ago
Hmm, RAID 5 seems like the obvious choice here. Balances capacity and redundancy nicely.
upvoted 0 times
Cherrie
2 years ago
I agree, RAID 5 provides both redundancy and good usable disk capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
2 years ago
RAID 5 is definitely the way to go for this server setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shenika
2 years ago
RAID 10 all the way! Maximum capacity and redundancy? Sign me up!
upvoted 0 times
Lashawn
2 years ago
I agree, RAID 10 offers the best of both worlds for this server setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
2 years ago
RAID 10 is definitely the way to go for maximum capacity and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selene
2 years ago
I agree with you, Francine. RAID 10 provides both redundancy and maximum usable disk capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
2 years ago
I think RAID 10 would be the best option for this server.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel