CompTIA PK0-005 Exam - Topic 4 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's PK0-005 exam

Question #: 20
Topic #: 4

A PM is working on the preliminary scope statement and identifies that this project has the same approach as another project that was completed last year. Which of the following actions would the PM most likely perform?

ACall the previous PM for advice on risks and issues.

BAsk the project sponsor to provide previous final project report results.

CComplete the project charter using the other PM's subject matter expertise.

DUse existing artifacts and accommodate based on the current project success criteria.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

This is where an existing application that is highly utilized by clients is moving to a new release, as it involves deploying and operating it in a live environment.Reference= CompTIA Project+ Study Guide1, Chapter 4: Project Environments

by Carey at Apr 30, 2024, 08:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PK0-005 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Daniela

4 months ago

I wonder if the project sponsor would even have the final report handy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jean

5 months ago

Using existing artifacts sounds like a smart move too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delsie

5 months ago

Wait, how do we know the last project was actually successful?

upvoted 0 times

...

Naomi

5 months ago

I agree, leveraging past experiences is super helpful!

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharan

5 months ago

I think the PM should definitely call the previous PM for advice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

6 months ago

I vaguely remember a practice question about consulting with subject matter experts, but I wonder if that applies here or if we should focus on documentation instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harrison

6 months ago

I feel like using existing artifacts makes sense, especially if they align with our current goals, but I'm not entirely confident about how to adapt them.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eva

6 months ago

I think asking the project sponsor for the final report could provide valuable insights, but I can't recall if that's the most efficient option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zoila

6 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of leveraging past projects, but I'm not sure if calling the previous PM is the best first step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mignon

6 months ago

Option A is interesting - calling the previous PM for advice could be really helpful. But I'm not sure if that's the most likely action the PM would take. I might lean more towards option D, but I'll have to weigh the pros and cons of each choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Henriette

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm torn between options B and D. Should I ask the sponsor for the previous project report or just use the existing artifacts? I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

6 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question. I'd probably go with option D - using the existing artifacts and accommodating based on the current project success criteria. That seems like the most logical approach to leverage the previous work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Serina

6 months ago

I feel pretty confident about this one. The PM would most likely use option D and leverage the existing artifacts from the previous similar project. That seems like the most efficient and practical approach to take.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenny

6 months ago

I think the ECC Queue is responsible for the XML payload that gets sent to or from an instance. That makes the most sense to me based on the options provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louann

6 months ago

I agree with the advice to do the report. The project manager needs to compare this change to other possibilities, so the information is important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emilio

12 months ago

I'm going with D. It's the 'use and reuse' approach, and who doesn't love a good recycling project? Especially when it's not your trash to sort through.

upvoted 0 times

Golda

10 months ago

It's all about efficiency and maximizing resources.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

10 months ago

Exactly, why reinvent the wheel when you can just tweak it?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dustin

10 months ago

It saves time and resources to build on what already works.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eve

11 months ago

Definitely, it's a practical approach to leverage past success.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamala

11 months ago

It saves time and resources, and ensures consistency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

11 months ago

I agree, using existing artifacts is a smart move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

11 months ago

I agree, using existing artifacts is a smart move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

12 months ago

Asking the project sponsor for the previous final project report results seems like a waste of time. The PM should just use what they already have.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janet

12 months ago

But wouldn't it be helpful to call the previous PM for advice on risks and issues as well?

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

12 months ago

I agree with Selma. It makes sense to leverage what worked well in the previous project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kasandra

12 months ago

I'd go with option D. Why reinvent the wheel when you can just adapt the existing stuff? Efficiency, people!

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

12 months ago

I think the PM should use existing artifacts and accommodate based on current project success criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Holley

12 months ago

But wouldn't it be helpful to call the previous PM for advice on risks and issues as well?

upvoted 0 times

...

Marlon

12 months ago

Calling the previous PM for advice is a good idea, but it may not be necessary if the project approach is truly the same.

upvoted 0 times

An

11 months ago

D) Use existing artifacts and accommodate based on the current project success criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coral

11 months ago

A) Call the previous PM for advice on risks and issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mireya

1 year ago

I agree with Armanda. It's important to leverage what worked well in the past.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veronika

1 year ago

Using existing artifacts and accommodating based on the current project success criteria is the most logical approach. It saves time and leverages previous learnings.

upvoted 0 times