Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CompTIA PK0-005 Exam - Topic 4 Question 20 Discussion

A PM is working on the preliminary scope statement and identifies that this project has the same approach as another project that was completed last year. Which of the following actions would the PM most likely perform?
B) Ask the project sponsor to provide previous final project report results.
A) Call the previous PM for advice on risks and issues.
C) Complete the project charter using the other PM's subject matter expertise.
D) Use existing artifacts and accommodate based on the current project success criteria.

CompTIA PK0-005 Exam - Topic 4 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's PK0-005 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 4
[All PK0-005 Questions]

A PM is working on the preliminary scope statement and identifies that this project has the same approach as another project that was completed last year. Which of the following actions would the PM most likely perform?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This is where an existing application that is highly utilized by clients is moving to a new release, as it involves deploying and operating it in a live environment.Reference= CompTIA Project+ Study Guide1, Chapter 4: Project Environments


by Carey at Apr 30, 2024, 08:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PK0-005 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Daniela
10 months ago
I wonder if the project sponsor would even have the final report handy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
10 months ago
Using existing artifacts sounds like a smart move too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
10 months ago
Wait, how do we know the last project was actually successful?
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
10 months ago
I agree, leveraging past experiences is super helpful!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
11 months ago
I think the PM should definitely call the previous PM for advice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
11 months ago
I vaguely remember a practice question about consulting with subject matter experts, but I wonder if that applies here or if we should focus on documentation instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
11 months ago
I feel like using existing artifacts makes sense, especially if they align with our current goals, but I'm not entirely confident about how to adapt them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
11 months ago
I think asking the project sponsor for the final report could provide valuable insights, but I can't recall if that's the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of leveraging past projects, but I'm not sure if calling the previous PM is the best first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
11 months ago
Option A is interesting - calling the previous PM for advice could be really helpful. But I'm not sure if that's the most likely action the PM would take. I might lean more towards option D, but I'll have to weigh the pros and cons of each choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm torn between options B and D. Should I ask the sponsor for the previous project report or just use the existing artifacts? I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I'd probably go with option D - using the existing artifacts and accommodating based on the current project success criteria. That seems like the most logical approach to leverage the previous work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
12 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The PM would most likely use option D and leverage the existing artifacts from the previous similar project. That seems like the most efficient and practical approach to take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
12 months ago
I think the ECC Queue is responsible for the XML payload that gets sent to or from an instance. That makes the most sense to me based on the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
12 months ago
I agree with the advice to do the report. The project manager needs to compare this change to other possibilities, so the information is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 year ago
I'm going with D. It's the 'use and reuse' approach, and who doesn't love a good recycling project? Especially when it's not your trash to sort through.
upvoted 0 times
Golda
1 year ago
It's all about efficiency and maximizing resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
1 year ago
Exactly, why reinvent the wheel when you can just tweak it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
1 year ago
It saves time and resources to build on what already works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
1 year ago
Definitely, it's a practical approach to leverage past success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
1 year ago
It saves time and resources, and ensures consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 year ago
I agree, using existing artifacts is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
1 year ago
I agree, using existing artifacts is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
Asking the project sponsor for the previous final project report results seems like a waste of time. The PM should just use what they already have.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janet
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be helpful to call the previous PM for advice on risks and issues as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
1 year ago
I agree with Selma. It makes sense to leverage what worked well in the previous project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
1 year ago
I'd go with option D. Why reinvent the wheel when you can just adapt the existing stuff? Efficiency, people!
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
1 year ago
I think the PM should use existing artifacts and accommodate based on current project success criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be helpful to call the previous PM for advice on risks and issues as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
1 year ago
Calling the previous PM for advice is a good idea, but it may not be necessary if the project approach is truly the same.
upvoted 0 times
An
1 year ago
D) Use existing artifacts and accommodate based on the current project success criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
1 year ago
A) Call the previous PM for advice on risks and issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mireya
1 year ago
I agree with Armanda. It's important to leverage what worked well in the past.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
1 year ago
Using existing artifacts and accommodating based on the current project success criteria is the most logical approach. It saves time and leverages previous learnings.
upvoted 0 times
Nickolas
1 year ago
It definitely makes sense to leverage previous project success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 year ago
I think using existing artifacts is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
1 year ago
I agree, it's efficient to build on what's already been done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
1 year ago
That's a smart way to approach it.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Armanda
1 year ago
I think the PM should use existing artifacts and accommodate based on current project success criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel