Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIW 1D0-610 Exam - Topic 5 Question 43 Discussion

Which of the following is a drawback to using Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP)?
B) Symmetric-key encryption is susceptible to cracking.
A) Wireless network overhead is excessive.
C) The number of devices that can communicate using WEP is limited.
D) Encryption and decryption speeds are slower compared to other protocols.

CIW 1D0-610 Exam - Topic 5 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIW's 1D0-610 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 5
[All 1D0-610 Questions]

Which of the following is a drawback to using Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Deeanna
8 months ago
Limited devices? That's news to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
9 months ago
The overhead isn't that bad, but B is a big issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
9 months ago
Wait, I thought WEP was still okay for basic use?
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
9 months ago
Totally agree, B is definitely a drawback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
9 months ago
WEP is super easy to crack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
9 months ago
I vaguely remember that WEP's encryption speeds weren't the best, but I can't decide if that's option D or if it was something else entirely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
10 months ago
I thought WEP had issues with overhead, but I can't recall if that's related to option A or not. It feels like a trick question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarence
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like I saw a practice question that mentioned WEP's limitations with the number of devices. Could that be option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
10 months ago
I remember studying WEP and its vulnerabilities, and I think option B about symmetric-key encryption being susceptible to cracking sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is B. WEP's use of static, shared keys makes it susceptible to cracking, which is a major drawback compared to more secure encryption methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
10 months ago
Okay, let me see. I remember learning that WEP has some weaknesses compared to newer protocols like WPA. I think the symmetric-key encryption is the main vulnerability, so I'll go with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know WEP has some security issues, but I can't remember the specifics off the top of my head. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B. WEP uses symmetric-key encryption, which is known to be susceptible to cracking. The other options don't seem like major drawbacks to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
10 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different actions the Citrix Web App Firewall could be performing that could trigger a false positive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
10 months ago
Kismet is a popular wireless monitoring tool, so that's my best guess for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
10 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Option A seems like the standard way to move solutions between environments. As long as I export and import the managed solutions correctly, that should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
10 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. The bot ID and the app secret are the two values I would select to complete the deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the different account balances and transfer amounts. I'll need to read through this carefully to make sure I understand the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
1 year ago
WEP, more like 'Weak Encryption Protocol', am I right? Seriously, that B option is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Francesco
1 year ago
Let's switch to a more secure encryption method as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
1 year ago
We should definitely consider using a more secure protocol.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
1 year ago
I agree, symmetric-key encryption is just too easy to crack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
1 year ago
Yeah, WEP is definitely not the most secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Timothy
1 year ago
The slow encryption/decryption speeds of WEP are also a problem, but the security issues are definitely the biggest concern.
upvoted 0 times
Rikki
1 year ago
D) Encryption and decryption speeds are slower compared to other protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
1 year ago
B) Symmetric-key encryption is susceptible to cracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 year ago
A) Wireless network overhead is excessive.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kathrine
1 year ago
I agree with Kerrie. WEP's reliance on weak encryption is a big drawback that makes it an outdated and insecure protocol.
upvoted 0 times
Dominque
1 year ago
D) Encryption and decryption speeds are slower compared to other protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
1 year ago
C) The number of devices that can communicate using WEP is limited.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
1 year ago
B) Symmetric-key encryption is susceptible to cracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
1 year ago
A) Wireless network overhead is excessive.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerrie
1 year ago
Option B is the correct answer. Symmetric-key encryption used in WEP is susceptible to cracking, making it a major security flaw.
upvoted 0 times
Edwin
1 year ago
That's right, using WEP leaves the network vulnerable to attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
1 year ago
B) Symmetric-key encryption is susceptible to cracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reena
1 year ago
I believe another drawback is that encryption and decryption speeds are slower compared to other protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
1 year ago
I agree with Caitlin, that's a major security concern with WEP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
1 year ago
I think the drawback of using WEP is that symmetric-key encryption is susceptible to cracking.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel