Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Citrix Exam 1Y0-403 Topic 9 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-403 exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 9
[All 1Y0-403 Questions]

Scenario: An additional zone was recently added to a Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment. The main zone is located in New York City, and a small, second zone is located in Tokyo. Within the next year, the number of users in Tokyo is expected to equal that in New York City.

A Citrix Architect recommended the addition of 2 StoreFront servers in Tokyo to support the users.

What should the architect recommend for this environment to ensure user-experience consistency and reduce WAN bandwidth consumption?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Shakira at Dec 09, 2024, 09:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-403 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Tiara
5 months ago
D, all the way. Anything else is just overkill and makes things more complicated than they need to be. Keep it simple, right?
upvoted 0 times
Kaitlyn
4 months ago
Yeah, I think D is the way to go. It's important to prioritize simplicity in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
4 months ago
I see your point, but having separate server groups could add unnecessary complexity. D still seems like the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
4 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to have separate server groups for redundancy? A might be a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luke
4 months ago
I agree, keeping it simple is key. D sounds like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caitlin
5 months ago
Haha, I bet the architect who recommended this is regretting it now. Gotta love those curveball questions! I'm going with D, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
5 months ago
C? Really? Standalone servers? That's just creating more complexity than necessary. D is clearly the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Viola
4 months ago
D is the best choice for user-experience consistency and reducing WAN bandwidth consumption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
4 months ago
Yeah, having the StoreFront servers in the same group would definitely simplify things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
5 months ago
I agree, D seems like the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dan
5 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option B would be more efficient in reducing WAN bandwidth consumption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
5 months ago
B looks good to me. Optimal Gateway routing will ensure users are directed to the closest StoreFront server, reducing WAN bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
Chuck
5 months ago
Agreed, it will improve user experience by directing them to the closest server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
5 months ago
That sounds like a good idea. It will definitely help with reducing WAN bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leana
5 months ago
B) Add 2 StoreFront servers and configure the Optimal Gateway routing feature
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Haley
5 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is D. Adding the StoreFront servers to the same server group just makes sense for load balancing and user experience consistency.
upvoted 0 times
Delmy
4 months ago
True, it's important to consider both load balancing and WAN bandwidth consumption in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charolette
4 months ago
That's a good point, maybe having them in separate groups would be more efficient for WAN bandwidth consumption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
4 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to have them in separate server groups for subscription synchronization?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
4 months ago
I agree, having the StoreFront servers in the same group will definitely help with load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ben
5 months ago
But wouldn't having separate server groups with option A provide better redundancy and load balancing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better as it utilizes the Optimal Gateway routing feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
6 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows for subscription synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel