Citrix 1Y0-403 Exam - Topic 12 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-403 exam

Question #: 66
Topic #: 12

Scenario: A Citrix Architect is designing a new Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment. Management has advised that they have a limited budget for the new solution. However, they still expect the design to account for future growth without the need to redesign or repurchase central hardware components. Additionally, the current 1 Gb network infrastructure CANNOT be replaced within the scope of this project. The architect has determined that the company can support both current and future load with 2 to 3 separate Virtual Delivery Agent (VDA) machine images.

Which two features should the architect consider while designing the Citrix Hypervisors for the proposed Citrix environment? (Choose two.)

AThin provisioning

BPXE boot with PVS

CBoot from SAN

DvApps

EiSCSI storage

FIntellicache

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Salena at Feb 27, 2023, 06:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-403 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Charlie

7 months ago

Wait, can they really support future growth with just 2-3 images?

upvoted 0 times

...

Bo

7 months ago

Boot from SAN? Seems like a big investment for a tight budget.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

7 months ago

PXE boot with PVS could be overkill for this setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

7 months ago

Totally agree, it helps save space and costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashaunda

7 months ago

Thin provisioning is a must for budget constraints!

upvoted 0 times

...

Olive

8 months ago

I feel like iSCSI storage might be a good choice too, especially since it can work with the existing 1 Gb network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulene

8 months ago

Boot from SAN seems like a solid option for performance, but I’m worried about the cost implications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rana

8 months ago

I’m not entirely sure, but I think PXE boot with PVS could be beneficial for quick deployments, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Orville

8 months ago

I remember discussing thin provisioning in class; it helps save storage space, which is crucial given the budget constraints.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

8 months ago

The reinvestment assumption is a big one - MIRR uses a more realistic rate, so that could be the answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bette

8 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The use of a central tracker is just for coordinating the file distribution, but the actual file transfer happens directly between the users. That means it's a peer-to-peer network, so the answer is C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Taryn

8 months ago

I'm pretty sure I've seen this statistic before, but I can't quite remember the exact percentage range. Let me try to reason it out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clement

1 year ago

Ah, the classic Citrix dilemma - do more with less. Thin provisioning and Intellicache sound like the perfect combo to stretch that budget and network. Just don't forget to factor in the cost of a crystal ball for future growth predictions.

upvoted 0 times

Margarett

12 months ago

A: Just need to make sure we plan for future growth without overcommitting resources.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

1 year ago

B: Agreed, those features will help optimize resources and performance without breaking the budget.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerrie

1 year ago

A: Thin provisioning and Intellicache are definitely key features to consider for this Citrix environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisbeth

1 year ago

Hold up, vApps? What is this, the future? Let's keep it simple, folks. Thin provisioning and Intellicache are the way to go. Though I'm tempted to suggest a carrier pigeon network as a backup.

upvoted 0 times

Kris

11 months ago

Let's stick with the recommended features to keep things simple and cost-effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

11 months ago

A carrier pigeon network might be a bit too unconventional for this project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christiane

11 months ago

Agreed, those features will help optimize performance and storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Devora

11 months ago

Thin provisioning and Intellicache are solid choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sina

12 months ago

Let's stick with the tried and true options for now.

upvoted 0 times

...

Boris

12 months ago

I'm not sure about the carrier pigeon network, but it's always good to have a backup plan.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marica

12 months ago

Agreed, those features will help us maximize our resources efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

1 year ago

Thin provisioning and Intellicache are definitely the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammi

1 year ago

PXE boot with PVS? Nah, that's too much hassle, especially with the budget and network limitations. I'd go with Boot from SAN and iSCSI storage - simple and reliable.

upvoted 0 times

Tonette

1 year ago

Agreed, PXE boot with PVS might be too much trouble. Thin provisioning could also help optimize storage usage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Layla

1 year ago

Boot from SAN and iSCSI storage are definitely the way to go. Simple and reliable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavelle

1 year ago

Hmm, thin provisioning sounds like the way to go. It'll let us maximize our limited budget and accommodate future growth. As for the network constraints, I bet Intellicache will help optimize the traffic over that 1Gb link.

upvoted 0 times